"Assuredly, it is they in the Hereafter who will be the greatest losers[Al-Akhsaroon]. " 11:22
Dr. Fadel, in this noble verse..
our Lord, Almighty, said; the greatest losers[Al-Akhsaroon]..
not; the losers[Al-Khasiroon].
though, it may be the same?
NO.
It is not?
Why?
Grammatically; [Al-Akhsaroon] is a Superlative Adjective..[Tafdeel= the best]
It means the highest level of loss.
A person losing himself, what is left for him?
Are there [Tafdeel= the best] in loss?
Of course.. there are..
As better[Tafdeel]?
No, as in levels.. Grammatically it is called; [Tafdeel= Comparative]
i.e. the level of loss here.
e.g. losing one Dirham..
is it like losing a Million Dirham?
No.
So, we have levels of this too.
True.
We have levels..
here and there..
in the good and the bad.
So, suppose He used the word; the losers..
Who is losing more..
the greatest losers or the losers?
The greatest losers.
Then, this is what He meant..
because, they've lost themselves.
Is it like the verse; " Say, [O Muhammad], "Shall we [believers] inform you of the greatest losers as to [their] deeds?" 18:103
Yes, because no one would lose more than them.
Oh, Allah, the Most Kind!
So, they are the top losers..
Yes, the greatest losers among all people.
"[They are] those whose effort is lost in worldly life.. " 18:104
".. while they think that they are doing well in work."
Of course, this is the highest level of loss.
It is not a Comparative Adjective, it is Superlative.
Is this more indicative?
Of course.
between the more loser.., and the most loser
Of course.. Definitely.
Good.
Here, Allah, Almighty, said:
"Assuredly, it is they[Anna-hum] in the Hereafter who will be the greatest losers[Al-Akhsaroon]."
[Annahum]
But, in Surah An-Naml, he said:
".. and in the Hereafter they[Hum] are the greatest losers." 27:5
Without saying; [Anna-hum].. for confirmation with;[Anna-]?
Why, what is the nice style here?
and why it is confirmed in one verse rather than in both verses?
What is the difference between the two verses?
The confirmation is not only by the word; [Anna=It is.]
The word; Assuredly[La Jarama] is confirming too.
Assuredly[La Jarama] is for confirmation?
What does this word mean?
No guilt?
No, it means; Inevitable.. a must..
And also, Arabs use it in the places of oath..
[La Jarama]?
Yes.. i.e. surely.
So, sometimes..
they swear saying; [La Jarama=surely], I'll come to you.
meaning is; Surely, I'll come to you.
Surely!
Yes, to confirm.
Yes.
So, it means; Surely.. and what else it means?
Inevitably.. and, it is a must..
a must?
Yes.
Unavoidably.
Yes, in addition to using if for swearing..
in Arabic language, sometimes.
Okay, the oath.
So, we have here, two words for confirmation.. not only one word.
[La Jarama] and [Anna=It is].
i.e. Surely it is..
True,
So, why the verse in Surah An-Naml doesn't have the confirmation?
Let's..
Let's read the verse in Surah An-Naml..
"Indeed, for those who do not believe in the Hereafter.. " 27:4
Yes.
".. We have made pleasing to them their deeds, so they wander blindly. "
"Those are the ones for whom there will be the worst of punishment.. "
".. and in the Hereafter they are the greatest losers."
So, "Indeed, for those who do not believe in the Hereafter.. "
He said that ..
these losers are..
those who do not believe in the Hereafter..
True.
Isn't it like this?
Yes.
While in the verse in Surah Hud.. He said..
They lied against their Lord..
".. and the witnesses will say, "These are the ones who lied against their Lord.".. " 11:18
Yes.
"Who averted [people] from the way of Allah.. " 11:19
".. and sought to make it [seem] deviant.. "
".. while they, concerning the Hereafter, were disbelievers."
And this is the worst thing.. all of them!
In the first verse, they did only one thing.
of all these things.
So, they are more here.
They did three issues and then He said..
".. For them the punishment will be multiplied.. " 11:20
Notice this..
At An-Naml, He only mentioned that..
they do not believe in the Hereafter.
True.
Here, He mentioned that..
They lied against their Lord.
And, they averted people from the way of Allah.
and they sought to make it seem deviant
and concerning the Hereafter, they were disbelievers.
How many?
their punishment will be multiplied.. Okay.
Four issues, while is Surah An-Naml, it was one issue.
So, which verse must be confirmed?
The verse in Surah Hud.
Okay.. This is a must.
I mean, it is like..
a law in math..
This can't be other than like this.
Any observant in linguistics..
won't say, they are the same.
He must say the verses as Allah said them.
This is the only possible way.
But, Dr. is it in the language..
when we talk the Arabic language..
should we take all these matters into consideration?
while writing?
Yes, if he was aiming at rhetoric and eloquence.
But, if it was whatever.. he can say anything.
He can write a rough outline..
So, to mean writing in rhetoric and eloquence..
he must take into consideration all the points that you've said..
the effect of this and that
He must, if the writing is with rhetoric and eloquence.
So, writing with rhetoric and eloquence is a very hard task..
Of course.
So, it is hard to achieve.
Of course.
Amazing.
Not everyone have the command of language .
I know that you write poetry..
When you are writing your poems..
Do you chang.. correct..
fix and replace..
Sometimes.
Do you do like this?
Sometimes
Do you check every word?
Sometimes
How about talking about your poetry?
Okay, but I don't have examples now..
Not now..
I'm only joking with you sir.