The invention of photography was not one discovery
that led to what we understand as photography today.
There are winners and losers in the evolution of photography.
It’s so fascinating at every different point in its history
The way that we familiarize ourselves with
the world around us just fundamentally changed with photography.
The silhouette is really the essence.
That’s the essence of a person’s soul
and people knew that.
The term photography in Greek is light drawing.
So when you’re drawing with light, you can do it with chemicals
but before photography you would look at the shadow
you would trace the shadow.
The problem with drawing a shadow with someone is
that if you put a person in a room
and you put a candle on one side of that person and it casts a shadow
it’s a very big shadow.
So the biggest problem is how do you take a very big shadow
and make it into a little tiny shadow.
So there are tools that they used.
The Pantograph machine that has these intersecting bars
with a pencil and you could trace the large object
and it would make it into a very small object.
There was an inventor by the name of Chretien, who invented a device
that would trace the shadow of a person
through a series of levers.
It would then reduce the picture at the same time.
And this instrument is called a Physionotrace.
The thing about the silhouette and the Physionotrace
that made them different from a painted portrait was that they were mechanical.
They were much more objective portraits of individuals.
Unlike paintings, which were very subjective.
Camera Obscura means dark room. That’s all it is.
It’s a room with no light in it.
And if you have a room with no light
and you poke a little hole in the side of that room and you let light in
from the outside, by miracle you’ll have an image projected upside down
turned around, but in color and moving on the other side of the wall.
It’s a phenomena that people have been aware of for thousands
and thousands of years. It’s easy to do.
It’s very often the first project that is taught in photography classes
just as a way to get people to understand the simplicity
of what the camera is.
Later improvements of the camera obscura
included putting a lens in the hole so that the light could be focused
so that you would have have a brighter and more focused image
that would be projected on the wall.
But for photography the camera is essentially a box.
The early experimenters of photography
all knew that they wanted to make images in that box.
The story of the invention of photography builds
on experiment after experiment.
Johann Heinrich Schulze is a German professor.
And in the case of Schulze’s experiment what you have is a glass jar
and it’s filled with chalk.
There’s some nitric acid and there’s some silver.
It’s sparingly sensitive to light.
So you have this jar with a barrier around the outside
and when the light goes through the stencil
it then darkens the chalk that is facing the glass on the inside of the jar.
And this is where Schulze contributes to the evolution of photography
is that he’s proving that this is done by light, and not by heat.
Thomas Wedgwood was the son of the famous potter, Josiah Wedgwood.
The signature of the Wedgwood line
was the decoration that was made of silhouettes.
It’s no surprise that one of the Wedgwoods would think that
the light that makes a silhouette could also make an image by the action of light.
Wedgwood is experimenting with silver nitrate.
And he’s brushing silver nitrate onto sheets of paper and
onto pieces of stretched white leather.
He was making images by doing contact printing of photograms.
He was putting an object on top of the sensitive paper or leather.
and when you put these in the sun
it’s very easy to see the effect of light.
You can see the paper darkening.
So it makes sense he would want to make pictures in a camera obscura.
After all, camera obscuras have been used for years
to make an image on a ground glass so you could do drawings.
So you could see the effect of light coming into a camera obscura
and producing an image.
And yet he had no real success with his process.
He wasn’t able to make those images last.
He wasn’t able to fix the image.
Those images were fleeting.
They disappeared after a certain amount of time.
Talbot, Daguerre, Niepce all know about the work of Wedgwood
because Humphry Davy, his friend
had written an account of his work that was published in 1802.
It was a springboard
from which other people could then do their own experiments.