with chris Christie Iran paul and steve King all angling for position in advance
for the 2016 presidential election
we have our first ever three-way catfight here fighting back and forth
about not my a number of different issues and so we've got some videos for
you I
a dance probably a headache is gone horse racing but I think there's nothing
but fun
thoughts are with the the first video this chris Christie talking about Rand
Paul's foreign policy
and it it's pretty insulting just watch I'm love all these
eso te Rick debates that people are getting some Rampal for example one
hissing you can name any number people love over gays in he's one of them
I mean these esoteric intellectual debates
I wanted to come to New Jersey in sick across from the widows
and the orphans and have that conversation and and and they won't
cuz that's a much tougher conversation a half
yet so he's hidden in there on his foreign policy talk in a couple other
clips about how
there's this strain of libertarianism going to the party right now which i
think is kinda
dangerous territory from to walk in advance or my mark on them
but specifically there he references the 9/11 families and Rand Paul did not take
kindly to that and so
he responded to relieve I think kinda sad and cheap
that he would use that cloak %uh not elect 9/11 victims and say
oh I'm the only one who cares about these victims hog wash if he cared about
protecting this country
maybe he wouldn't be in this gimme gimme gimme gimme all the money you have in
washington or don't have
and he'd be a little more fiscally responsible and know that the way we
defend our country
to what we have enough money for national defense is by being frugal
and not by saying gimme gimme gimme all the time
he also called in by the way the keynote Baker yeah I know I think we saw very
telling
thing they're about the two wings a the same party because chris Christie twice
a day esoteric
in a matter have 30 seconds and Rampaul said hogwash and I think that sorta sums
up the esoteric wing
and the hot watching I actually think one of them is gonna win this
it's gonna be Rand Paul because the he knows he has to get through the
primaries
right and chris Christie keeps shifting to things that sound more like a
democrat
that will not get you to see me that they screw a Rampal the long run in the
general election
but I think he's playing the game a little bit better actually yeah I
definitely do think especially on this particular issue of like government
spying and all that stuff in foreign policy
Rand Paul up I wouldn't say wins my vote but definitely gets more support for me
than chris Christie does
I think that the libertarian streak that pushes for strong national security
but less in terms of foreign policy like going into other countries make
that is actually a great streak and I love that makes me support libertarian
ideology
you get the fiscal policy in you lose me right here but I
I like what Rand Paul has to say about foreign policy
I don't know if I believe him I don't know if he's genuine
and overall I think that he's a terrible person to tell a terrible politician
arm but in just on that particular issue I think that he wins over Chris
yeah it was it was a very weird awkward quote that he gave right there where he
starts of talking about foreign policy any so obviously wants to talk about
economic policy instead
it's just being frugal that'll make a safe and everything but so
one of the reasons I think Rand Paul is going to have a tough time in the
primaries because
the new wing and the neo-con wing of the party is not happy with his
lack of intervention sort of approach to foreign policy and so they're already
starting to attack him
see-saw chris Christie their their client at each other and Steve up to
start Peter King jumps in and hits a
grandpa's well when the issues you mention their about the NSA either
there was absolutely disgraceful that so many republicans voted to
defund the a NSA program which is done so much
to protect our country this is a isolationist read this in our party
it said goes totally against the party a vise an hour in reagan
wash opposite where's the real Republican Party why they were gonna
find that out over the next three years
I with Republican Party three-party a strong national defense
when you are Rand Paul actually comparing snowden
sumatra the kangaroo Henry David Thoreau this is madness this is the
anti-war left-wing democrats in the nineteen sixties
that nominated george mcgovern and destroy their party from was twenty
years
and we can have a healthy debate with so many genera candidates not that fringe
is like rainfall in the
2016 sorry I think about that why I know this will be a bother out here but I'm
from Long Island where Peter King is a congressman and I grew up liking this
guy he was well-liked in a lotta
circles that you know my family is over but he has gone off the deep end with
yes so there has been a major shift in him it started around 9/11 which is when
it started for a lot of people
but now he's really gone off the deep end I'm just so lost
retired the fear-mongering and thinking
convincing Americans to buy into the notion that we have to give up our
rights
in order to be protected and as I mentioned earlier in the show today
obviously the surveillance isn't doing much when we had a bombing a few months
ago in Boston
you see what i'm saying I just it look
if your gonna go so far as to collect data without
any warrants okay without any indication
that someone is involved in some sort errors activity
then it should yield significant results but the government is not specific with
us they keep saying things like
well this widespread surveillance a internet activity
I helped us capture 300 tears I'm not thinking behind that
I want you to be specific and I want you to elaborate 300 is a very odd number
and very large numbers well very large number yeah I love I don't agree with
that number and i don't agree with the numbers they came out when initially the
leaks were coming out years ago 1220
fifty people were caught during the initial testimony i I didn't agree with
them
but I don't I understand your frustration there needs to be
reasonable suspicion there needs to be there needs to be some sort of suspicion
free to gather the information I i get as I am disagreeing with you well i'm
saying is
any sort of defensive policy is not gonna be foolproof and so simply because
something bad happens does not mean that it didn't ward off
I don't like these programs I think they should be ended but that's the argument
that the the government would give
like yet we can have a great defense doesn't mean we are never ever going to
get hit ever and if we do it doesn't mean that we should cancel the program
you know I have you got a great idea if you're concerned about terrorist
activity and hostility toward the United States
how do you stop bombing innocent civilians how bout you stop doing
signature strikes and double tops
because thats exactly the type of activity that's causing hostility toward
the United States
yeah I mean why do you think do you think people just randomly one attack us
because we are like big macs because our lifestyles know it's because a
activity that's happening abroad yeah so if that's what you're really worried
about if you want to protect
Americans and you want to strengthen national security stop killing civilians
abrupt