>> WE HAVE NOT SPOKEN DIRECTLY
WITH THE WHISTLE-BLOWER.
WE WOULD LIKE TO.
BUT I'M SURE THE WHISTLE-BLOWER
HAS CONCERNS THAT HE HAS BEEN
ADVISED AS THE LAW REQUIRED BY
THE INVESTOR GENERAL OR THE
DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL AND TERRAN
RELIGIONS JUST TO HOW HE'S TO
COMMUNICATE WITH CONGRESS.
AND SO THE REST OF THE
WHISTLE-BLOWER IS RETALIATION.
>> Martha: THE COMMENTS FROM
ADAM SCHIFF A FEW WEEKS BACK
LANDING
TO THE HOUSE INTEL CHAIR AND SM
TO THE HOUSE INTEL CHAIR AND SE
HOT WATER.
"THE WASHINGTON POST" GIVE THEM
FOUR PINOCCHIOS BY CLAIMING
ASKING IF THE PUBLIC CANNOT
TRUST MR. SCHIFF TO BE HONEST ON
THE ORIGINS OF HIS INFORMATION,
WHY SHOULD HE TRUST THE CLAIM
THAT THE INFORMATION ITSELF IS
SERIOUS.
HERE NOW, TREY GOWDY.
FORMER HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
CHAIRMAN AND A FOX NEWS
CONTRIBUTOR.
GOOD EVENING TO YOU.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE FOUR
PINOCCHIOS?
>> I THINK HE GOT FOUR BECAUSE
YOU CANNOT GET FIVE FOR HE GOT
THE MAXIMUM SENATE YOU CAN GET
AND DO YOU KNOW HOW HARD THAT
WAS FOR "THE WASHINGTON POST"?
TO GIVE ADAM SCHIFF FOUR
PINOCCHIO'S?
>> Martha: THEY DID TO THEIR
CREDIT.
THAT'S
>>
THAT'S THE SECOND SOUND OF THE
APOCALYPSE.
I'VE GOT TO GET MY AFFAIRS AND
ORDER.
HE'S ALSO A CAREER OFFENDER,
MARTHA.
A SAME GUY WHO HAD THE PARITY,
WEEK OR SO AGO, TO HAVE MUELLER
THAT MUELLER COULDN'T FIND.
HOW LONG IS SPEAKER PELOSI GOING
TO PUT UP WITH ADAM IS HANDLING
THIS INVESTIGATION.
HERE IS HE TAKING IT AWAY FROM
JERRY NADLER.
I'M SURE THE GUYS AND GALS ARE
NOT HAPPY.
IF YOU ARE GOING TO DO IT, DON'T
MAKE STUFF UP, ADAM.
HE IS IN THE EVIDENTIARY CHAIN
WHAT HAPPENED WITH THIS WAS A
BLOWER AND I HOPE THE
REPUBLICANS MAKE HIM TESTIFY.
>> HE EASILY COULD'VE ANSWERED
THE QUESTION EASILY AND SAY YES,
HE CONTACTED US, HERDED THROUGH
THE PROPER CHANNELS.
WHY DO YOU THINK HE DIDN'T?
DOES IT SAY SOMETHING ABOUT
DEEPER INVOLVEMENT ON HIS PART?
WHAT DOES THAT REVEAL, THAT HE
WASN'T WILLING TO SAY THAT, I
WONDER?
>> IN THE WORDS OF PATTI
LOVELESS, HE'S GOT A LITTLE
TROUBLE WITH THE TRUTH.
WHY DOES ANYBODY LIE, THEY ARE
AFRAID THE TRUTH IS GOING TO GET
THEM IN TROUBLE.
SCHIFF HAS RECEIVED A PASS --
THE WHOLE TIME I WAS IN
CONGRESS, I DON'T EVER REMEMBER
A NEGATIVE WORD ABOUT HIM.
I MEMBER HIM COMPLAINING
REPUBLICANS WOULD MEET WITH
WHISTLE-BLOWERS.
I WOULD REMEMBER HIM COMPLAINING
WHEN THE REPUBLICANS WOULDN'T
MEET WITH WITNESSES THAT HE
WASN'T PRESENT.
THE THIRD MISTAKE HE'S MADE --
MAY BE THE MOST MAJOR
INVESTIGATION HE'S EVER GOING TO
BE PART OF.
I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG
NANCY PELOSI IS GOING TO PUT UP
WITH THIS.
>> Martha: WHAT'S THE IMPACT
OF THAT?
WHAT'S THE IMPACT OF THE CASE?
THE LEAD PERSON ON THIS IS
MAKING THESE MISSTEPS.
HOW IMPORTANT IS IT FOR THE BIG
PICTURE?
>> HOW BAD WAS IT WHEN
MARK FUHRMAN INVESTIGATED IN
O.J. SIMPSON'S MURDER?
THE -- I'M NOT PREJUDGING
MARK FUHRMAN, BUT I AM
PREJUDGING PETER STRZOK.
FOR ANYONE WHO WONDERED IF ADAM
SCHIFF CAN BE DISPASSIONATE, I
NEVER WANTED THAT.
BUT IF ANY OF YOUR VIEWERS DID,
HE MAKES UP FACTS AND OPENINGS,
WITH THE TRUTH WOULD'VE SERVED
HIM JUST FINE.
HE JUST DECIDED TO LIE ABOUT IT.
>> Martha: THIS IS A PIECE OF
SOUND FROM SUSAN RICE WHO SAYS
THERE IS AN ATTACK ON DEMOCRACY
COMING FROM
1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.
LISTEN TO THIS AND I WANT TO GET
YOUR OPINION ON IT.
>> FOR THE FIRST TIME I CAN
REMEMBER, OUR COUNTRY IS IN
EFFECT UNDER ATTACK.
>> YOU WRITE THAT IN YOUR BOOK,
YOU BELIEVE.
>> THE ATTACK IS COMING FROM
WITHIN.
IT'S COMING FROM
1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.
FOR ALL THE SECURITY THREATS I
SAW AS NATIONAL SECURITY
ADVISOR, ALL THE CHALLENGES WE
FACE, I NEVER THOUGHT I'D SEE
THAT.
>> Martha: WHAT DO YOU THINK
OF THAT?
>> I THINK THAT MIGHT BE THE
SAME SUSAN RICE WHO WENT ON THE
FOX MORNING TALK SHOWS TO BOTCH
EVERY SINGLE FACT WHAT HAPPENED
IN BENGHAZI, LIBYA.
I THINK IT'S THE SAME SUSAN RICE
WHO THREATENED TO RUN AGAINST
SUSAN COLLINS BECAUSE SHE HAD
THE UNMITIGATED TEMERITY TO VOTE
FOR BRETT KAVANAUGH FOR U.S.
SUPREME COURT.
THE BIGGEST THREAT TO OUR
DEMOCRACY IS WHEN PEOPLE WHO
DON'T LIKE TRUMP AND DIDN'T VOTE
FOR HIM WANT TO UNDERMINE AND
REVERSE ELECTION RESULTS.
THAT'S WHAT'S GOING TO DO WITH
SIN AS A REPUBLICAN.
LOOK, SHE DIDN'T VOTE FOR TRUMP.
SHE DIDN'T VOTE FOR HIM, BUT YOU
STILL HAVE TO RESPECT THE FACT
THAT LOTS AND LOTS OF PEOPLE DID
AND HE WON THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
TO SAY THAT'S A THREAT TO
DEMOCRACY AND THAT YOU HAPPEN TO
DISAGREE WITH SOMEONE?
YOU UNDERMINE THE ELECTION TO
GET RID OF SOMEONE SIMPLY