When you look at pictures of the Earth from space, what’s the first thing that you see?
A blue marble, as some have described it.
A water world where oceans and swirls of white cloud dominate.
But most of us will then have our attention drawn to the shapes imprinted on its surface
– the continents.
And they come in many colours.
The white of Antarctica, the beige of the Sahara, the light green of grasslands and
the darker shades of our planet’s forests in their many forms.
So many of these colours that give the world its look are the result of trillions of individual
plants growing upon the surface.
Which plants grow where is determined by many factors, with climate being most dominant
factor.
Desert and scrubland, savannah, prairie and steppe, tundra and taiga, woodland and rainforest.
They are at the base of almost every food chain of every animal – the habitats that
sustain all other lifeforms, and ourselves.
Collectively, they are known as biomes - the living landscapes of Earth.
Landscapes have been an inspiration to us for centuries, the subject of countless painters,
writers, photographers and movie directors.
The natural vistas of our home countries and foreign lands, perhaps more than anything
else, determine that area’s character.
And while these landscapes are shaped underneath by topography – the presence of coastlines,
hills and mountains - their surfaces are defined by the degree of plant life growing upon them.
Earth’s vegetation is almost infinite in terms the variety of species that grow upon
it.
As plants are wholly dependent upon liquid water, what types of species grow where is
determined primarily by annual patterns of temperature and rainfall in that area – the
local climate.
An abundance of heat and water produces the greatest growth potential, such as in the
tropical rainforests, while lower temperatures or rainfall reduce such growth and shape the
plant life in various ways so that it can survive drought and frost.
The main groupings of plant varieties in this regard can be thought of in the following
way: - Trees – from the coniferous evergreens
of the boreal forests, to mixed temperate woodlands and the evergreen broadleaf forests
of the tropical regions - Shrubs – occurring in almost every climate
zone, either as a junior partner in forests, or dominant as they are in semi-arid areas,
such as the Mediterranean - Grasses – again occurring in almost all
areas, but known especially in their singular biomes of the tropical savannah, and the temperate
prairie and steppe - Desert adaptations – with cacti being
the most well known - Very cold adaptations such as found in tundra
These adaptations span the basic classes of plants in terms of evolutionary heritage.
For instance, the class of flowering plants, known as angiosperms, are found in every category
as just described.
The term biome is often confused with the concept of a climate zone, but these are different
in nature.
A climate zone is defined simply by the patterns of rainfall and temperature, and these are
discussed in detail in my Secrets of World Climate Series, which is linked top right.
Biomes are the adaptations of plants, principally influenced by climate zones, but by other
factors also.
Perhaps the most interesting of these is the different ways in which plants evolve in the
same climate types, but isolated on different continents.
For instance, eucalyptus forest dominates the eastern seaboard of Australia, which has
the same humid subtropical climate to that of the south-eastern United States and Southern
China, and yet we do not find eucalyptus in those other continents, but instead oaks or
bamboo.
In the opposite way, many species have adapted to live in multiple climate zones, for instance,
the pine tree family can be found from the subarctic to the tropics.
Another influence is the type of soil that might be present in a region, from sand through
to silt and clay.
As the soil affects drainage of water away from roots, this affects what species will
be present within the same climate zone since plants have different sensitivities in this
regard.
So climate zones and biomes should never be thought of as synonymous.
In fact the subject of biomes is significantly more complex because of life’s way of evolving
along different paths through random mutations when presented with the same external conditions.
This complexity is evidenced by the many different attempts to classify geographical distribution
of biomes over the last century and a half with varying degrees of consensus.
By comparison, climate classification has been dominated by a single figure in all this
time – Vladimir Koppen.
On that subject, of climate, let’s return to that, and focus on how and why exactly
differing patterns of precipitation and temperature can so markedly affect the type of vegetation
covering an area.
In the 1940s, Leslie Holdridge developed this graph showing how a combination of temperature
and rainfall could produce the different biome types observed across the planet, what he
call Life Zones.
At first this looks like a beast of complexity, but if we break it down, it will make sense.
From top to bottom we have increasing temperature, either from the poles to the equator, or the
tops of mountains to the sea.
On the right side of the triangle we have annual precipitation, from dry in the centre
to wet on the right.
The combination of temperature and rainfall yield a factor called the aridity index.
It is actually the ratio of potential evapotranspiration to total rainfall.
Evapotranspiration is the combined effect of direct evaporation of water from the soil
plus the outward transpiration of water from plants through the gas exchange cells in their
bodies.
Potential evapotranspiration is the maximum possible amount of water lost in this way,
assuming there would a limitless amount of water available.
The highest temperatures combined with the lowest rainfall produces the highest aridity
index, and this is where we find deserts capable of supporting little if any plant growth.
Both cooler temperatures with weaker sun and consequent lower evapotranspiration or a wetter
climate alike allow for plants and soil to retain more moisture and thereby increasing
plant growth, and so at the opposite end we find rainforests, either of the tropical or
temperate variety.
This concept is key in understanding how regions with differing rainfall and temperatures lead
to different types of vegetation.
It’s not simply about which areas have more or less rain.
Take, for example, the boreal forests which have a similar total annual rainfall to the
semi-arid Sahel just below the Sahara desert.
Totally different biomes despite the similar rainfall totals.
But because the boreal forests are much cooler, they can retain more moisture, leading to
extensive biomass, whereas plants and soil in the hot Sahel lose much more moisture in
comparison, leading to stunted shrub-like vegetation and plenty of bare earth.
In this series we’re going to use the recent classification known as LONS08, based on Dorman
and Sellers’ work of the late 1980s.
This global map shows the thirteen different biomes delineated by this classification.
Starting at the equator, and moving roughly outward toward the poles, these are summarised
as follows: - Tropical Evergreen Forest – where tropical
heat combined with year round rain permits broadleaf trees to retain their leaves permanently
- Tropical Seasonal Forest – where tropical wet and dry seasons cause broadleaved trees
to lose their foliage in the dry season - Savannah – where the tropical dry season
is of sufficient length or severity that trees are largely replaced by grasses
- Shrubland – where the challenges of wet and dry seasons both in the tropics and more
temperate latitudes lead to a domination of shrubs interspersed with grasses
- Semi-desert – similar to shrubland, but where the aridity index is so high that only
hardy shrubs or specially adapted families such as cacti can grow
- Desert – where the climate is so dry that virtually no vegetation is possible – the
biome of bare earth - Prairie and Steppe – where a lack of rain
combined with cooler temperatures in the mid-latitudes prevents tree growth and allows grasses to
dominate - Temperate Forest – the classic broadleaf
woodlands of the mid-latitudes, whose trees lose their leaves in winter
- Mixed Temperate Forest – where broadleaf and evergreen coniferous forests are mixed
at the mid-latitudes - Boreal Evergreen Forest – where cooler
temperatures in more polar latitudes lead to coniferous tree growth dominating in the
vast expanse of the taiga - Boreal Seasonal Forest – like the taiga,
but where winters are so severe that even the supposed evergreen conifers lose their
needles in this season - Tundra – where summer temperatures are
too low to allow for the growth of trees, leading to cold-adapted low-lying shrub-like
vegetation - Ice – where no vegetation is possible
due to year-round freezing conditions In this series, we’re going to look at each
of these areas in more detail, showing real examples of places where these exist, and
the dominant species found in each.
I hope you enjoyed this introduction.
If you did, please like and share this video, and ensure you’re subscribed to my channel,
so you can get notified when new releases occur.
Thanks again for watching, and I’ll see you in the first of the biomes next, where
we begin our journey in the forests of the tropics.