Was Jesus a socialist?
Well, if socialism is nothing more than being kind to other people, then you might think
the answer is yes.
But you can be kind to other people and be a capitalist.
John D. Rockefeller probably gave away more money than anyone in human history, and he
was certainly a capitalist.
Bill Gates and Warren Buffet have given away millions, too.
To get an accurate answer to our question, we need to define socialism.
Socialism is the concentration of power into the hands of government elites to achieve
the following purposes: central planning of the economy and the radical redistribution
of wealth.
Jesus never called for any of that.
Nowhere in the New Testament does he advocate for the government to punish the rich
—or even to use tax money to help the poor.
Nor does he promote the ideas of state ownership of businesses or central planning of the economy.
In Luke 12, Jesus is confronted by a man who wants him to redistribute wealth.
“Master,” the man says to Jesus, “tell my brother to divide the inheritance with me.”
Jesus replies, “Man, who made me a judge or divider over you?” and then he rebukes
the man for being envious of his sibling.
How about Jesus’s Parable of the Talents (talents were a form of money
in Jesus’s day)?
A man entrusted three of his workers with his wealth.
The two who invested the money and made a profit were praised and the one who buried
his share so he wouldn’t lose any of it was reprimanded.
Sounds a lot more like an endorsement for capitalism than socialism, doesn’t it?
Yes, Jesus spoke of the difficulty for a rich man to enter Heaven, but not because having
money is evil.
It’s not money; rather, it is the love of money, the New Testament tells us, that leads
to evil.
Jesus was warning us not to put acquisition of money and material possessions above our
spiritual and moral lives.
Was Jesus promoting a socialist model when he kicked the “moneychangers” out of the
Temple in Jerusalem?
Again, the answer is no.
Note the location where the incident occurred: it was in the holiest of places—God’s house.
Jesus was not angry at buying and selling in and of themselves; he was angry that these
things happened in a house of prayer.
He never drove a “moneychanger” from a marketplace or from a bank.
Jesus advises us to be of “generous spirit”—to show kindness, to assist the widow and the orphan.
But he clearly means this to be our responsibility, not the government’s.
Consider Jesus’s Good Samaritan story.
A traveler comes upon a man at the side of a road.
The man had been beaten and robbed and left half-dead.
What did the traveler, the Good Samaritan, do?
He helps the unfortunate man on the spot, with his own resources.
Ask yourself: To help the poor, would Jesus prefer that you give your money freely to
the Salvation Army, for example, or have it taxed by politicians to fund a welfare bureaucracy?
Progressives like to point out that Jesus said, “Render unto Caesar the things that
are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.”
But that has absolutely nothing to do with high taxes or wealth redistribution.
It was the seed for the idea of separating church and state.
It certainly wasn’t the same as saying that whatever Caesar says is his must then be so,
no matter how much he demands or what he intends to use it for.
So, there is no evidence that Jesus was a socialist.
And there is lots of evidence that he supported free markets.
In addition to the Parable of the Talents, Jesus offers his Parable of the Workers
in the Vineyard.
In it, a landowner hires some laborers to pick grapes.
Near the end of the day, he realizes he needs more workers to get the job done.
To recruit them, he agrees to pay a full day’s wage for just one hour of work.
When one of the laborers who had worked an entire day complains, the landowner answers,
“I am not being unfair to you, friend.
Didn’t you agree to work for a denarius?
Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money?”
That’s a testament to the principles of supply and demand, of private property, and
of voluntary contracts, not socialism.
Jesus never endorsed the forced redistribution of wealth.
That idea is rooted in envy, something that he, and the Tenth of the Ten Commandments,
railed against.
Most importantly, Jesus cared about helping the less fortunate.
He never would have approved anything that undermines wealth creation.
And the only thing that has ever created wealth and lifted masses of people out of poverty
is free market capitalism.
Read the New Testament.
The plain meaning of the text is loud and clear: Jesus was not a socialist.
He couldn’t be.
He loved people, not the state.
I’m Lawrence Reed, president of the Foundation for Economic Education, for Prager University.