now look i i i read over stone i would agree to be a shade out onto experience
and so i don't know what a bit now uh... we've had a problem for you know social
exchanges assent or so on
korva biased because of that and i also wanna watching his whole ten part series
on showtime amount will distribute mrs
that's where my
begin corp bias comes in here 'cause i thought it was terrific
an eye-opening
so now im predisposed to like you've got the resto and us
but boy did he mean expectations here but their video here for a c l_ u_
to talk about civil liberties
last line the twist that he uses there
i absolutely love
so watch this
does it concern you that the government is going on
thirty years ago to even ask this question would have been a scandal
if you live through watergate if you read the church committee reports you
know costs of a unchecked governments rights
government is exploiting our amnesia
we do not passing fourth amendment in order to protect those something to hide
we passed an amendment
which prohibits general warrants or limitless surveillance
as we know
all too well
almost a month ago
question is not
do you have something to hide
question is whether we control go
or the government trolls loss
all along that line at the end
question is do we control are own government were to closely our
government
or representatives
or does the government control loss that's the essence of the american
question
anti-american answer is we are suppose to control our government not the
reverse
that's exactly the right framing in that's exactly what sent him here
with the n_s_a_ spying issues and the gross violation of civil liberties
across the board
but what's interesting is as much as a liberal i gallery stone saying this is
not just
me saying a going greenwald a va ser rhoda jeremy schedule etcetera
it's now some congressmen and senators
slowly slowly with cacheris jerry l is uh... congressman from your he says the
national security state
has grown so that any administration is now not up fraught with congress
it's an imbalance is growing our government and one that we have to
clients
now look at how carefully saying that this is a democrat he doesn't listen to
obama administration
is the one that support here
but he is saying
was no matter what the administration bush administration or obama
administration
the national security state has gotten
totally out of hand
and by the way he represents the district
in new york city that got hit on my left
anne saying this is gone true for
uh... several online as well the few senators
who's been fighting bravely on this issue from day one
he says
these statements give the public a false impression
of how these authorities were actually being interpreted
referring to with the n_s_a_ set about their spine
the disclosures of the last few weeks have made it clear
this secret body of wall authorizing secret surveillance
overseen by a largely secret court as inference that american civil liberties
and privacy rights
without offering the public the ability
the judge for themselves whether these broad powers or appropriate or necessary
it's just the beginning here
we still have largely bipartisan support
in the national security state and the police state in the surveillance tape
they've got prominent democrats like dan feinstein and prominent republicans you
name 'em that with a federal grant bought a couple of others who say it all
absolutely the american people must be spied upon
they must all be assumed to be guilty
no specific work is necessary
which is unclear and obvious violation of the fourth amendment
but there are few brave soul saying look they made his decision seated and never
really told u other interpreting the law
and now they say well we've been doing it all up well that's no answer at all
for the fact
you've been doing it wrong along illegally unconstitutionally
all along
and the brave
voices mothers all restore ron wyden nurturing outlived are now being to
speak out we hope does which is build and build on both sides of the aisle
and so we finally get a consensus say
enough is enough
america's not supposed to be a police state
as stone pointed out there
it would have been unthinkable thirty years ago even in the midst
of nixon's abuses
the state of the police say we have now would have been on and magid oval and
unacceptable
and we've come
way too far and accepting it as america it will certainly our politicians and
certainly our media
we have to fight back and make sure he does not become the new america
we like america the way it was when he stood for free