CONSEQUENCES FOR THESE LAWBREAKERS
LAWBREAKERS LAWBREAKERS.
LAWBREAKERS. >> CONGRESSMAN SWALWELL, WITH ME
NOW IS SENATOR MARK WARNER.
AND HE JOINS ME NOW, YOU HAVE
BEEN A PREACHER OF CAUTION
THROUGHOUT THIS.
THROUGHOUT THIS.
MUELLER TODAY, DID IT DO YOU NOW LOOK AT THE MUELLER REPORT AS AW
LOOK AT THE MUELLER REPORT AS A DIRECT REFERRAL TO CONGRESS,
WHICH WAS THE INTENT OF THE
REPORT, WHICH WASNT IT FOR MANY
OF US IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS.
>> IM NOT SURE I COULD GO THAT
FOR FAR, I WOULD CLEARLY THOUGH
SAY THAT THERE IS NO WAY THIS
WHITE HOUSE CAN CONTINUE TO
CLAIM THAT THE MUELLER REPORT
CHON
CHON
EXONERATED HIM.
ONE WAS THAT MUELLER DID NOT EXONERATE THE PRESIDENT. NOT
EXONERATE THE PRESIDENT. HE WAS CLEAR ABOUT THAT.
HE MADE THAT REFERRAL TO
CONGRESS.
CONGRESS.
AND THE OTHER WHICH IS WHERE HE STARTED AND ENDED HIS COMMENTS,
RUSSIA ATTACKED OUR DEMOCRACY.
WHAT I HOPE WE AGREE ON IS EVEN
IF WE DONT AGEE ON ALL OF THE
COMPONENTS OF WHAT TRUMP DID OR
DIDNT DO, LETS MAKE SURE THEY
DONT DO IT AGAIN IN 2020 AND THAT MEANS YOU HAVE TO PASS AN
ELECTION SECURITY BILL.
LETS PUT GUARD RAILS ANDERSON
FACEBOOK, AND EVEN IF 140
CONTACTS BETWEEN RUSSIANS AND
TRUMP OFFICIALS DIDNT REACH A
LEVEL OF CONSPIRACY, LETS, ON A
GOING FORWARD BASIS MAKE SURE
THAT IF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OR
FOREIGN AGENTS TRY TO INTERFERE
THERE IS AN AFFIRMATIVE
OBLIGATION TO TELL THE FBI. >> WHERE ARE THESE BILLS.I.
>> WHERE ARE THESE BILLS. FOR THE LIFE OF ME I DONT
UNDERSTAND, IF YOU READ THE DECK
THE DECLINATIONS.
MUELLER IS SAYING THE LAWS WERE
AMBIGUOUS.
ESSENTIALLY NOT WRITTEN FOR THE
MODERN ERA, IT WAS NOT EASY TO
FIGURE OUT HOW DO YOU PRICE THIS
AND FIGURE THIS, I DONT
UNDERSTAND WHERE ALL OF THE
LEGISLATION IS.
HOW DO WE MAKE EVERYONE VOTE ON
THIS?
WHERE IS IT.
>> I CANT SPEAK TO THE HOUSE, I
CAN SPEAK TO WHAT IM DOING IN
THE SENATE.
I HAVE THE FIRE ACT THAT WOULD
REQUIRE THAT IF YOURE CONTACTED
BY A FOREIGN AGENT OF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT AND THEY OFFER YOUGN
GOVERNMENT AND THEY OFFER YOU INFORMATION YOU HAVE TO REPORT
IT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT.
I HAVE THE SECURE ELECTIONS ACT. THAT WOULD PUT IN STRICTONS ACT.
THAT WOULD PUT IN STRICT SECURITY AROUND OUR ELECTORAL
SYSTEM, AND I HAVE THREE OR FOUR
PIECES OF LEGISLATION AROUND SOCIAL MEDIA THAT WOULD START TO
PUT GUARD RAILS AROUND THE
FACEBOOKS AND THE GOOGLES AND
THE TWITTERS BECAUSE WERE
SEEING WHAT THEY DID IN 2016.
BUT WERE SEEING NOT EVEN WHAT
RUSSIANS DID, BUT WHAT OTHERS
DID JUST LAST WEEK WITH A VIDEO
OF SPEAKER PELOSI, AND THAT IS
JUST, THAT IS YESTERDAYS
TECHNOLOGY, WAIT UNTIL YOU SEE
THE BAD GUYS USE DEEP FAKE
TECHNOLOGY, YOUR FACE AND YOUR
VOICE ON A BODY THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU AND THEAS NOTHING
TO DO WITH YOU AND THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THAT ARE HUGE
SKBRP.
>> WHAT IS YOUR BAR FOR IMPEACHMENT.OUR BAR FOR
IMPEACHMENT.
I KNOW YOURE A POTENTIAL JUROR, AND DONT USE THAT AS A COP OUT,
AND DONT USE THAT AS A COP OUT HERE PIP WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT
IS YOUR BAR FOR SEEING AN INQUIRY OPENED? SEEING AN
INQUIRY OPENED? >> I THINK SPEAKER PELOSI IN A
VERY CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT HAS
DONT EXACTLY RIGHT THING.
LETS CONTINUE TO GET MORE
INFORMATION OUT.
ONE OF THE REASONS IS AS SOMEONE
WHO REVIEWED THE MUELLER REPORT
I WISH MORE AMERICANS WOULD
REVIEW IT, AND AS MORE DATA POINTS COME OUT, AS HE IS SAID I
TODAY, EVERYTHING IS ON THE
TABLE.
TABLE.
I WILL DEFAULT TO THAT EXCUSE
THAT THE HOUSE WOULD HAVE TO LAUNCH THE INVESTIGATION, BUT I
THINK PELOSI NAVIGATED THIS
PRETTY GOOD TO FAR.
>> LET ME ASK IT THIS WAY, IS WILL GOING TO BE EASIER TO IS
WILL GOING TO BE EASIER TO DEFEND MAKING THE DECISION TO
OPEN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIREY IN FIVE YEARS OR HARDER.NQUIREY IN
FIVE YEARS OR HARDER.
>> I DONT THINK WE KNOW AT THIS
MOMENT IN TIME. IF WE GET MORE INFORMATION THAT
WILL BE CLEARER.
BUT AS YOU JUST SAID WITH ERIC, YOUR LAST GUEST, THE IDEA THAT,
YOUR LAST GUEST, THE IDEA THAT TRUMP MAY WANT TO LURE INTO THIS
BACK AND FORTH, I DONT KNOW WHERE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE
YET AT THIS POINT.
>> WHAT ABOUT THE ISSUE OF BILL
BARR AND IMPEACHING HIM?
AS THAT POPPED UP IN YOUR MIND? >> I VOTED AGAINST BILL BARR.D?
>> I VOTED AGAINST BILL BARR. I THOUGHT MAYBE BEING AN
ESTABLISHMENT GUY HE WOULD DO
THE RIGHT THING.
HE HAS NOT DONE RIGHT THING.
HE ACTED SIMPLY AS A LAWYER FOR
TRUMP, I THINK HE SHOULD RESIGN.
I HAVE BEEN BITTERLY
DISAPPOINTED ON HOW BADLY HE HAS DONE AS ATTORNEY GENERAL. HE HAS
DONE AS ATTORNEY GENERAL. I TRIED TO PUT A MARKER DOWN ON
THIS, I WILL HAVE THEIR BACK, I
DONT WANT A POLITICIZED
ATTORNEY GENERAL DECIDING WHAT
PART OF THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION INTELLIGENCE OUGHT
TO BE RELEASED BECAUSE I FEAR,
FRANKLY, FOR THE MEN AND WOMEN
THAT WORK FOR OUR INTELLIGENCE
COMMUNITY THAT THEY MIGHT POLITICIZE THAT INTELLIGENCE.
>> THANK YOU, YOURE STILL DOING
YOUR INVESTIGATION.
YOUR INVESTIGATION.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO THOSE REPORTS.FORWARD TO THOSE
REPORTS.
>> BEFORE THE FOURTH OF JULY,