PRESIDENT TRUMP.
HARRIS?
>> Harris: TREY YINGST,
THANK YOU FOR THE UPDATE.
DEMOCRATS ARE REPORTEDLY
PLANNING TO ISSUE A WAVE OF
SUBPOENAS IN THEIR IMPEACHMENT
PUSH AS PRESIDENT TRUMP SAYS HE
WOULD COOPERATE IF HE GETS A
FAIR SHAKE GRADE AND PREDICTS
THAT THE FIGHT WILL END UP
BEFORE THE NATION'S HIGHEST
COURT.
>> HE WROTE A LETTER YESTERDAY,
AND IT PROBABLY ENDS UP BEING A
BIG SUPREME COURT FACE.
MAYBE IT GOES A LONG TIME.
BUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS
BEEN TREATED UNBELIEVABLY GLADLY
AND UNFAIRLY BY THE DEMOCRATS.
>> Harris: TURNED TO ME NOW,
FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR
ROBERT RAY, WHO SERVED AS
INDEPENDENT COUNSEL DURING THE
WHITEWATER INVESTIGATION.
ROBERT, GOOD TO SEE YOU TODAY.
>> NICE TO BE WITH YOU.
>> Harris: NEW DEVELOPMENTS
TODAY IN TERMS OF DEMOCRATS NOW
CALLING FOR A FULL VOTE ON THE
HOUSE, AND SAYING WHAT THEY WILL
DO IF THEY DON'T HAVE THE
WITNESSES THAT THEY NEED.
I WILL PLAY A BIT OF THOUGHT BUT
I WANT TO FIRST GET YOUR
REACTION TO THE NEWS.
>> I THINK THERE IS MERIT IN
THAT.
I'VE BEEN SAYING FOR A LONG
TIME, THEIR POSITION LEGALLY IN
THE CASES THAT ARE PENDING
BEFORE MOST OF THE DISTRICT
COURT AND THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA WOULD BE ENHANCED IF
THERE IS AN IMPEACHMENT BOAST IN
THE HOUSE.
BECAUSE IT SEEMS TO SUGGEST THEY
WILL HAVE ADDITIONAL FACTUAL
AMMUNITION TO BE ABLE TO SAY IF
THE ACTION OF THE ENTIRE BODY
AND PRECEDENTS THAT WILL ALLOW
THEM A BETTER ARGUMENT TO
GET ACCESS, AMONG OTHER THINGS,
TO GRAND JURY MATERIAL.
>> Harris: 'S OF THE MOST
VOCAL VOICE ON THIS SO FAR IS
CONGRESSMAN GARAMENDI OF
CALIFORNIA, WHO CALLED FOR THIS
FOR A HOUSEBOAT, THINK
SPEAKER PELOSI DEFINITELY HAS
THE VOTES TO GET AN IMPEACHMENT
INQUIRY THROUGH THE HOUSE.
AND IT OPENS UP THE LEGAL
PROCESS TO MAKE IT FAIR.
BUT THEN HE ISSUED A THREAT TO
THOSE WITNESSES THAT DO GET
CALLED.
HE SAYS HE HAS A SOLUTION IF
THEY DON'T TALK.
>> I THINK IT'S TIME TO CALL IN
THE ARSENAL, MARCH THEM UP TO A
JAIL, WHICH DO YOU HAPPEN TO
HAVE AND ONE OF THE ROOMS OF THE
CAPITAL.
LET THEM SIT THERE AND COOL OFF
FOR A WHILE.
I WOULD USE THE FULL POWER AND
AMONG THAT IS THE QUESTION OF
INHERENT RIGHTS OF THE CONGRESS
HOLD PEOPLE.
I THINK WE HAVE TO BE PREPARED
TO GO ALL OUT ON THIS.
>> Harris: WOW, PUTTING
WITNESSES BEHIND BARS IF THEY
DON'T TALK.
HOW DOES THAT PLAY LEGALLY?
>> I DON'T KNOW, BECAUSE I DON'T
WANT TO SUGGEST THAT'S AN IDLE
THREAT.
ON THE OTHER HAND, THE EXECUTIVE
BRANCH HAS FAR MORE RESOURCES AT
ITS DISPOSAL.
>> Harris: LIKE WHAT?
>> IN TERMS OF PROTECTING
WITNESSES, IF THE EXECUTIVE
BRANCH DOESN'T WANT TO DELIVER
UP WITNESSES TO THE CONGRESS.
LOOK, THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH HAS
THE FBI, IT HAS ALL THE
RESOURCES OF ALL THE EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENTS.
>> Harris: WHAT ABOUT THE U.S.
SUPREME COURT?
THE PRESIDENT SAYING IT COULD
END UP THERE.
>> ON PORTIONS OF THIS HE MAY
WELL BE RIGHT.
THERE ARE ISSUES ABOUT, FOR
EXAMPLE, ACCESS TO GRAND JURY
MATERIAL.
THAT PARTICULAR ISSUE IS
ACTUALLY THE SUBJECT OF A
PENDING PETITION BEFORE THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT,
THAT MAY RESULT IN THE
SUPREME COURT REVIEWING THAT
ISSUE.
THERE ARE ISSUES CURRENTLY
PENDING WITH REGARD TO ACCESS TO
THE PRESIDENT'S TAX RETURNS IN
CONNECTION WITH WITH, DIRECTLY
IT ALSO INDIRECTLY, REGARDING
THE EMOLUMENTS CASES THAT ARE
PENDING BEFORE THREE CIRCUIT
COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES.
ANY ONE OF WHICH MAY ULTIMATELY
BE RIGHT EVENTUALLY FOR REVIEW Y
THE SUPREME COURT.
SO THE PRESENT IS RIGHT IN PART
ABOUT THAT.
THERE'S QUESTIONS ABOUT THE
INDEPENDENCY OF THIS IMPEACHMENT
INQUIRY, AND THE EFFORTS BY THE
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES THAT
MAY WELL LEAD FOR THE SUPREME
COURT.
>> Harris: RIGHT, AND WE KNOW
WITH THE NEW APARTMENTS ON THE
SUPREME COURT THAT COULD LOOK
LIKE POLITICALLY FROM THE
PRESIDENT.
WE DON'T HAVE TEA LEAVES AT THIS
POINT.
>> NOR DID WE KNOW WHEN THAT
WOULD MAKE IT THERE.
EVEN IF THESE ARE DEALT WITH ON
AN EMERGENCY BASIS, AFTER SAY TO
YOURSELF, HOW LONG WOULD THAT
TAKE BEFORE THERE WOULD BE A
DECISION AND CORRECTION WITH
THOSE MATTERS?
>> Harris: DEMOCRATS THINK
IT'S ALL TIPPED OFF BY THAT FOLK
ARE BETWEEN OUR PRESIDENT AND
UKRAINE'S PRESIDENT.
THIS HITTING THE WIRES JUST
MOMENTS AGO.
"THE U.K. AND PRESIDENT SAYS NOT
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOT
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOS
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOI
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOY
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOI
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOS
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOH
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOE
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOU
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOI
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOT
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TOS
SURE HE WOULD TELL HIS AIDES TO"
OF THE DEMOCRATS RUNNING OUT OF
WITNESSES AT THIS POINT?
IT BE A WITNESS.
>> OF COURSE, AND THAT MAY WELL
BE THE RESULT.
CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO COMPEL
A WITNESS WHO IS A UKRAINIAN
NATIONAL AND WORKS FOR THE
UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT TO SIMPLY
GET ON A PLANE AND COME TO
WASHINGTON TO TESTIFY BEFORE A
HOUSE COMMITTEE.
ONLY IF UKRAINE VOLUNTARILY
DELIVERED THAT PERSON OF THE
UNITED STATES WITH THE HOUSE
HAVE ANY EXERCISE AND ABILITY OR