- [Instructor] In this video we're going to talk
about economic growth,
and I wanna be very careful here.
Because depending on the context,
people, including economists, might mean different things
by economic growth.
In everyday language when people are talking
about economic growth,
they're usually just talking about an expansion
in the output of an economy over time.
So if real GDP is increasing,
they might consider that to be economic growth.
But the context that we're going to talk about
in this video,
and this is one that you might see in an introductory
economics class or an AP economics class,
we aren't just talking about an increase
in real GDP over time.
We are talking about an increase in the full employment
output over time, regardless of where we are
in the economic cycle.
So keep that in mind as you watch this video.
If we're just talking about the increase
of real GDP, we're gonna call that an expansion,
not necessarily economic growth.
And we're gonna call real GDP decreasing
as being equal to a contraction.
When we talk about economic growth,
we're actually talking
about the full employment output increasing.
And this could happen somewhat independently
of where we are in the actual economic cycle.
Let's do a little diagram to make that a little bit clearer.
So right over here I have plotted real GDP
of an economy versus time.
And what you see here in yellow is how the real GDP
is fluctuating and it's fluctuating
around its full employment output.
Let's pick this time right over here, call it t sub one.
So right at this point,
that is our full employment output.
Let's call it y sub f sub one.
But we see that our economy is performing
above our full employment output.
We have a positive output gap.
If we go from that point in time,
fast forward a little bit to t two.
So let's go to sub two here.
Because the y sub f right over here,
the full employment output right over here is flat,
according to this we would not have experienced
any economic growth from t sub one to t sub two,
even though the real GDP would have grown.
We would've grown from this point to this point
right over here.
So one way to think about it is,
we are expanding as long as this curve is upward sloping,
but if the full employment output is not changing,
we are not experiencing economic growth.
The times where we actually are experiencing economic growth
are times where our full employment output is changing,
so let's say from this time right over there
to this time right over there.
And notice, that is happening, theoretically,
during a contraction.
This is a contraction right over here
where real GDP is actually pulling back.
But if we knew truly what the full employment output were
and were able to plot it like this,
theoretically we actually are experiencing
economic growth here, despite a contraction.
To appreciate this,
let's look at other models
that we have studied in economics.
So we think about a production possibilities curve.
The ones that we typically see
only have two goods or services.
A real economy's gonna be much more complex.
It would have millions of goods and services,
but it's very hard to draw a million-dimension
production possibilities curve.
But what this shows us is at a snapshot in time,
what is the full employment output.
And it shows us the trade-off between these two
goods or services.
Now if we're in a situation where we're behind
the production possibilities curve,
that is a negative output gap,
and it's possible that over time,
we go from this negative output gap
back to the production possibilities curve.
That would be an expansion in the economy,
but by the definition that we're talking about here,
which is not what is typically talked about
in the news or something like this,
we would not call that economic growth.
Economic growth happens when we push out
the production possibilities curve,
when we have an increase in our full employment output.
So economic growth is maybe through
some new technology or some more workers
or resources or just better institutions,
we're able to push our production possibilities curve out.
This is an example of economic,
economic growth.
So for example,
this could be our production possibilities curve
at let's say t three
where this is t sub three right over here,
and then this is our production possibilities curve
at t sub four,
where this is t sub four right over here,
where our full employment output has increased.
We can also think about the same idea
using our aggregate demand or aggregate supply model.
When we studied that,
we saw that in the short-run,
because of say a demand shock or a supply shock,
we could be operating to the left or the right
of our full employment output,
creating these positive or negative output gaps,
but over time we're going to gravitate
back to this full employment output.
And so as long as our production possibilities curve
isn't getting pushed out, isn't changing,
or as long as our long-run aggregate supply curve
is not changing,
according to the definition that I'm talking about
in this video, we are not seeing economic growth.
The analog for what we saw in this PPC curve
is maybe this is the long-run aggregate supply curve
at t three,
but if our economy has more resources,
maybe more population, more natural resources,
better technology, better institutions,
maybe it's able to produce more at full employment.
And in that situation,
our long-run aggregate supply curve would shift
to the right.
And so this could be our long-run
aggregate supply curve at time t four.
So this is full employment output let's call that sub three.
This would be full employment output sub four.
The big takeaway here is,
regardless of where we are in the expansion
or contraction of our business cycles,
the economic growth is the change in that blue line.
And if we're looking at the PPC it's a shift out
of our PPC, of our production possibilities curve.
If we're looking at the aggregate demand
aggregate supply model,
it is a shift to the right of our long-run
aggregate supply curve.
And once again,
what are the things that can cause that?
And these are good to know.
There's a notion of capital.
Traditionally people have just thought hey more factories,
more resources, more land,
maybe that will push things out,
and it definitely could.
But more modern definitions are thinking human capital.
Hey if we have a better educated workforce,
a more skilled workforce, that could also matter.
People also think about things like technology.
If we can discover better ways of putting together
the resources we have,
that can also increase our productivity,
and that's what we would call technology
in an economics context.
And things like institutions matter as well.
You could imagine if your bureaucracy
is really slows things down,
if it takes forever to get a permit to do something,
well that might put a hamper on what
the full employment output is.
But if the institutions become much more efficient,
well then that might allow the country,
allow that economy, to produce more at full employment.
So all of these things could push out your PPC,
could push your long-run aggregate supply curve
to the right, or cause this blue curve
which represents your full employment output
to move up over time.
All of that would be economic growth.