HE ANSWERED THAT TONIGHT.
>> Sean: JOHN SOLOMON, GREAT
REPORTING.
EDITOR IN CHIEF,
JUSTTHENEWS.COM.
NOW AUTHOR OF "THE PRICE AND
PRINCIPLE", ALAN DERSHOWITZ AND
LINDSEY HALLIGAN.
STARTS WITH YOU, LINDSEY.
IS EVERYTHING THAT ALAN TALKED
ABOUT LEGITIMATE?
>> YES, THE WITHHOLDING AND LACK
OF TRANSPARENCY IS CRAZY.
MIGHT BE THE FIRST STEP OF
TYRANNY.
IF IT WASN’T FOR TRUTH SOCIAL,
TWITTER MIGHT HAVE BANNED
PRESIDENT TRUMP FROM TELLING THE
WORLD WHAT HAPPENED MONDAY.
SEEMS THAT THEY WANT TO SILENCE
PRESIDENT TRUMP AND CANCEL HIS
ABILITY TO TELL THE TRUTH.
IF YOU LOOK AT HIS TRACK RECORD,
HE’S EXPOSED THEM SPYING ON HIS
CAMPAIGN, THE CORRUPTION OF
HUNTER BIDEN’S INFLUENCE
PEDALLING FOR MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS AND THREE, VOTER FRAUD.
THE INVENTION OF BALLOT DROP
BOXES, WHICH THE SUPREME COURT
JUST RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
NOW HE’S EXPOSING THE OVERREACH
OF MONDAY’S RAID ON MAR-A-LARGO.
WE STILL DON’T KNOW WHAT EXACT
DOCUMENTS THAT THEY TOOK OTHER
THAN SOME MOMENTOS.
>> Sean: PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ,
LET’S GET YOUR TAKE ON THIS.
VERY SPECIFICALLY, TOO, ALONG
WITH THE CLASSIFICATION ISSUE,
THE ESPIONAGE ACT, SECTION CITED
IN THE WARRANT.
>> WELL, FIRST OF ALL, IT IS
TRUE THAT THESE WITH
DECLASSIFIED, THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT MUST IMMEDIATELY FILE
AN AMENDMENT TO ITS REQUEST FOR
A SEARCH WARRANT.
IT MUST DISCLOSE THIS NEW
INFORMATION TO THE JUDGE.
UNLIKE WHAT HAPPENED OVER THE
FISA WHERE THEY FAILED TO
DISCLOSE THIS NEW INFORMATION.
IF IN FACT THESE MATERIALS WERE
DECLASSIFIED, THE SEARCH
WARRANT, THE APPLICATION FOR THE
SEARCH WARRANT AND THE
AFFIDAVIT, IF IT DIDN’T INCLUDE
THIS INFORMATION, WOULD HAVE TO
BE VOIDABLE AT THIS POINT.
SO THAT IS THE FIRST KEY.
THERE’S SO MANY OTHER ISSUES
HERE.
THE ESPIONAGE ACT.
AS A CIVIL LIBERTARIAN, IT WAS
THE WORTH ACT POSSIBLE USED TO
GO AFTER DISSIDENTS, USED TO GO
AFTER PREVIOUS PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATES, EUGENE V.DEBBS, A
SOCIALIST.
CIVIL LIBERTARIANS HATED THIS
ACT.
YOU CAN’T USE THE ESPIONAGE ACT.
IT WAS USED AGAINST ELLSBERG.
PEOPLE CAN SAY NOW WE CAN GET
TRUMP.
WE COULDN’T GET HIM PREVIOUSLY
BUT WE CAN USE IT AGAINST TRUMP
AND TRY TO DISQUALIFY IT.
WE’RE GOING TO AMEND THE
CONSTITUTION AND SAVE THE
CRITERIA.
IT GOES BEYOND THE CONSTITUTION.
CONGRESS CAN PASS A STATUTE
SAIDING IF YOU’RE CONVICTED
UNDER A CRIME, YOU CAN’T.
IF THAT WERE TRUE A DEMOCRATIC
CONTROLLED CONGRESS COULD
DISQUALIFY A REPUBLICAN LIKE
TRUMP FOR RUNNING AGAINST
RE-ELECTION.
THAT WOULD BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
>> Sean: LET ME FOCUS IN ON ONE
THING THAT YOU’RE SAYING HERE.
THE ESPIONAGE ACT, 18 USC 793
CAME UP WITH HILLARY CLINTON AND
SANDY BERGER THAT WENT INTO THE
NATIONAL ARCHIVES, SHOVED THEM
IN HIS SOCKS AND WALK OUT WITH
THEM AND GOT A SLAP ON THE
WRIST.
HILLARY CLINTON, EVEN JAMES
COMEY ADMITTED THAT IN FACT SHE
HAD TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED
INFORMATION ON A SERVER THAT WAS
HACKED BY FOREIGN ENTITIES, BUT
SAID YEAH, EVEN THOUGH WE
ACKNOWLEDGE THE LAW WAS BROKEN,
NO PROSECUTOR WOULD PROSECUTE.
NOW WE HAVE WHAT?
DO WE HAVE EQUAL JUSTICE OR NOT
IN THIS COUNTRY, PROFESSOR?
>> WE HAVE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
SAYING THAT EQUALITY IS THE
ESSENCE OF THE JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT.
BUT THEN NEVER EXPLAINING WHY
THESE ESPIONAGE STATUTES ARE
USED NOW WHEN THEY WERE NEVER
USED AGAINST BERGER AND
CERTAINLY NOT AGAINST CLINTON.
THE QUESTION IS, DO WE REALLY
HAVE EQUALITY OR DO WE HAVE A
DOUBLE STANDARD OF JUSTICE.
SEEMS LIKE GARLAND SAYS WE HAVE
EQUALITY, HIS ACTIONS SPEAK
LOUDER THAN WORDS.
GOING AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP, WHO
I VOTED AGAINST, I’M A LIBERAL
DEMOCRAT, NOT A REPUBLICAN.
I WANT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE
FOR HIM OR AGAINST HIM WHEN HE
RUNS AGAINST.
I DON’T WENT A BUREAUCRAT MAKING
THE DECISION WHETHER HE SHOULD
BE ALLOWED TO RUN.
SO I DON’T THINK WE HAVE EQUAL
JUSTICE TODAY AND I THINK EVERY
AMERICAN, RIGHT OR LEFT,
REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT, SHOULD
BE OPPOSED TO WHAT’S GOING ON
NOW AND DEMAND THAT THE
STANDARDS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY
USED CONTINUE TO BE USED AND NOT
BE ANY CHANGES BECAUSE SOMEBODY
IS A REPUBLICAN RATHER THAN A
DEMOCRAT.
EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW IS
CENTRAL.
>> Sean: LINDSEY, LAST WORD.
I WANT TO ASK YOU IN QUESTION.
WHEN THE PRESIDENT CALLED FOR
THE RELEASE OF ALL DOCUMENTS, IS
HE CALLING FOR THE RELEASE OF
THE AFFIDAVIT AS IT RELATES TO
PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ’S ARGUMENT
BASED ON JOHN SOLOMON’S REPORT,
WILL THE PRESIDENT ACT ON THAT
AND DEMAND THAT THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL TAKE THE ACTION THAT THE
PROFESSOR MENTIONED?
>> YES.
WHAT PRESIDENT TRUMP MEANS BY
RELEASE THE DOCUMENTS IS RELEASE
THE DOCUMENTS.
STOP HIDING STUFF.
THE ATTORNEYS HAVE ASKED THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OVER THE
PHONE MANY TIMES CAN YOU GIVE US
THE FULL AND COMPLETE INVENTORY
OF EVERYTHING THAT WAS TAKEN
FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP’S HOUSE.
THEY REFUSE TO GIVE A FULL LIST.
WHAT IS INTERESTING IS THE
WARRANT WAS EXECUTED FRIDAY.
IF -- THEY DIDN’T RAID THE PLACE
UNTIL MONDAY.
IF THE DOCUMENTS THAT PRESIDENT
TRUMP HAD AT HIS PROPERTY WERE
SO TOP SECRET, SO CLASSIFIED AND
SUCH A THREAT TO NATIONAL
SECURITY, WHY DID THEY WAIT TWO
TO THREE DAYS TO BREAK IN?
>> Sean: IF ITS ABOUT NUCLEAR --
YEAH, YOU THINK THEY WOULD HAVE
ACTED SOONER.
OR THE FBI AND THE DOJ WERE
THERE AND I’M NOT SURE IF YOU
WERE THERE, BUT I KNOW OTHERS
WERE.
DONALD TRUMP SAID YOU’RE WELCOME
ANY TIME.
COME BACK ANY TIME YOU WANT.
IS THAT TRUE?
>> THAT’S THE LAST THING THAT HE
SAID TO THEM WHEN THEY WERE ON
HIS PROPERTY.
HE SAID ANYTHING ELSE YOU NEED,
LET US KNOW.
THE NEXT TIME THEY HEARD FROM
THEM IS WHEN THEY ASKED
PRESIDENT TRUMP TO TURN OFF HIS
VIDEO SURVEILLANCE BEFORE THEY
STARTED THEIR SEARCH.
>> Sean: YOU STILL HAVE CONTROL
OF THAT SURVEILLANCE VIDEO?
WILL YOU BE RELEASING IT
PUBLICLY?
>> THAT IS UP TO PRESIDENT