In this short video we'll go through the assessment sheet from one of our former
students who unfortunately didn't pass in Midland licensing center due to the
Assessor's incorrect judgment of her driving skills. Basically she failed
mostly on vehicle management, so in all of the sections he did not mark her
sufficiently for the vehicle management and that's the main reason she failed. In
case you haven't seen this assessment sheet it's it's from the iPad or
the tablet that they use. Some of the licensing centers do anyway and it's
very incomprehensive it's just you know very confusing for most people see in
this section here, he marked her down for not giving way to a pedestrian, which the
client claims the pedestrian was standing next to a street and looking at
his phone and she got marked down for flow in that section which is really
strange. As you go down um "wrong gear"
so in his opinion over-revving engine is 2,000 revs per minute which is not
Again here under the vehicle management she drives in the third gear and repeats
which is exactly how we should do. Cruising in a residential zone at 50
kilometres an hour it's the third gear it's a recommended
gear 'cause otherwise your vehicle will not be responsive. It's going to be far
more difficult to transfer the power from the engine to the wheels if you're
driving in the fourth gear at 40 or 50 kilometres an hour. Down a little bit
further so as you can see she's satisfied most of the criteria, and here
she was driving a bit under, fair enough, that's it. Assessor commented she was
doing 33 and 50 zone because she was confused, because he allegedly asked
her to go to a higher gear and she didn't know what to do
steering, gear, clutch, brake, coasting, slipping clutch, stopping, assessor
comments, um steering, gear, clutch, brake error, wrong gear, over revs the engine again so
for the same reasons. Drives in the second gear for too long, he claims.
Unbelievable! Head check error, no check changing lanes, well this is more
crucial error in our opinion. This is something that people should fail, really.
If they forget to check the blind spot particularly near the highways, well apparently was
the exit of Roe Highway, so that could be dangerous. So down a bit further yeah so
she satisfied all of this. Flow, movement, path, flow, movement, again, again one point
down for signaling which is not not a major issue. Path, fails to track
accurately, yeah okay she may have done that, steering and gear, clutch, brake
consistently stopping what whatnot, so this is the end of the
report and basically she didn't make it. So, same candidate eight days later at
Cannington. She did exactly the same, nothing absolutely different
than she did in Midland, but she scored 100% for vehicle management.Talking about
consistency in standards. As you can see here on the top well this is the the old shape you
know it's a manual sheet, so they don't use in Cannington the iPad or the galaxy
tablets whatever they might have, so this is just an old system which is far more
you know, comprehensive and they're less confusing for people, see she's scored
every single point for vehicle management she'd lost none and
underneath it, she she needed to have only three minimum points but she scored
Five out of five sections. So, we did not make this particular Assessor aware
of any, you know, experience that she previously had at the different center
there was absolutely no talk whatsoever about it so we just basically brought her in
and asked her to do exactly the same.