Lauren Boebert tried very hard to justify her crusade against
the separation of church and state.
Something that constitution mentions pretty important freedom of religion,
but also freedom from religion.
The government should not be endorsing or
sponsoring any specific religion doesn't like that.
So she's trying to kind of explain where she's coming from.
Let's see if she does herself any favors here.
>> We were founded on the Judeo Christian values and we've just got so
far away from that.
And then Jefferson with his separation of church and state,
that's not in the constitution that frustrates me so badly.
That is not that's a letter, that was a letter and democrats,
ignorantly say this is in the constitution, separation of church and
state and they don't know what it means.
And they think that that means you can't talk about God.
Well, if there really is the separation of church and state,
like they believe it means, well then what is Ilhaam doing with her hijab on?
Why is she able to go in there with that?
I mean, why aren't they shouting out from the rooftops,
separation of church and state?
>> That's stupid in so many directions all simultaneously.
That first of all, progressive or liberals or whoever don't say that.
>> The country is gonna collapse.
That doesn't mean.
>> [CROSSTALK] >> I don't get it why is she wearing her
hijab?
>> She didn't even say it right.
She's only heard it 1000 times in her life, but she can't.
>> [CROSSTALK] >> Literally the least of her problems.
You're, allowed to wear clothing, you can wear clothing.
That's not what that means literally at all.
>> Members of Congress can wear articles of clothing that have
a connection to their faith, to their religious belief.
You can wear your crucifix.
>> It doesn't even have to have a connection to your,
it could be a cultural thing.
It could be a cultural.
>> It doesn't even mean she has no idea about anything,
literally stop electric idiots.
>> Lauren, Let's sit down.
Let's have a conversation.
Let me explain it.
I'll talk slowly.
We do have religious liberty in this country.
The point of the separation of church and state is to ensure that the state
meaning the government doesn't force a particular religion onto others.
Because we live in this country that has people of all different backgrounds,
all different religions.
And so it would be weird to on one hand,
refer to this country as one that values freedom and liberty.
And then on the other hand,
be a theocracy that forces one particular religious doctrine on all of its citizens.
You see what I'm saying?
So wearing a hijab or hijab as you would say, or wearing a crucifix on,
you know, your necklace, whatever, you wanna do.
That's okay, it becomes a problem when the government,
let's say passes legislation that forces all of us to wear a hijab.
Or forces all of us to wear a crucifix or
forces all of us to go to bible study whatever.
By the way what would the country's religion be?
She says Judeo Christian,
which is hilarious because you guys don't care about Jews, let's let's keep it real.
>> Yeah. >> Okay,
what does what does Judeo Christian really mean?
And what are Christians like you hoping happens in the end with
the Jewish population like we know.
>> Judeo Christian is not about including Jewish people in it,
it's about excluding anything other than those two.
>> Exactly. >> That's why they get so
mad about happy holidays.
It's not enough for them to be included.
They really wanna exclude other people from it.
No she first of all we can do this it's in our nature to look for actual values,
standards, principles and try to see what our principles are.
Let's be clear there aren't any.
She believes that they can buy either virtue of the number of
Christians in this country.
Or the fact that our political system is so warped that they can have a super
majority in the Supreme Court without that being reflective what people want.
That they can just make it so that Christianity is in charge.
It is not about, well you're allowed to have religion, I believe that.
And so right now there's a lot of Christians so
I guess we're Judeo Christian.
But if someday the country was 80% Hindu then I guess the US government
would operate under principles of Hinduism.
There's no principle there.
She just wants her religion in charge so
that she can suppress people who are not a part of that religion.
>> She loves freedom.
>> That's it. >> She loves freedom,
that's what freedom looks like.
And by the way.
>> She loves supremacy of groups she's a part of that.
>> That's right. >> That's it.
That's the only principle.
>> So she hates this country.
Let's be clear.
She hates the constitution, she hates what this country's the idea of America,
she hates it because the idea of America is liberty is freedom, right.
How are you going to support that idea by
forcing whatever your religious doctrine is on everyone else?
By the way your husband showed an underage waitress his penis.
Okay sit down, how about that?
Sit down,
these people are running around moralizing about how other people live their lives.
Your husband whipped his out and showed it to a 17 year old waitress.
Sit down, I get it, you're a bad girl, been arrested a few times yourself and
these are the most dangerous people in the country.
Let me just be clear about that because what happens is they have
a past that they're ashamed about then they find Jesus and to overcompensate for
the massive failures they were previously.
And honestly continue to be in the case of Bumbling Boebert.
They decide to be the pious ones who go around judging everyone else moralizing
about whatever anyone else is doing as if they're the good ones.
They have the moral high ground, right.
You don't have moral high ground.
She's a hateful, disgusting anti American human being that I have no respect for.
And no, we don't live in a theocracy as much as you want it.
We're not gonna get it cuz I will fight to the death to prevent that from happening.
I'm not interested in living in a theocratic
authoritarian country that they drool over they are disgusting.
By the way, Lauren Boebert is not the only one.
Let's go to this compilation.
>> There is no separation of church and state.
It's a fabrication, It's a fiction, it's not in the constitution,
it's made up by secular humanists.
>> What is happening now?
Traditional American values are being trashed as extreme as outrageous.
Look, this is a country found on Judeo Christian ethics.
Okay, this is in my courtroom, in most courtrooms, in this country.
They say in God, we trust it's even on our money.
>> The reason we had so many overreaching regulations and
our nation is because the church complied.
>> [INAUDIBLE] >> The church is supposed to direct
the government.
The government is not supposed to direct the church.
That is not how our founding fathers intended it.
And I'm tired of the separation of church and
state junk that's not in the constitution, it was in a stinking letter and
it means nothing like what they say it does.
>> So there's a couple of so first of all,
it was in a stinking letter written by one of the people that you think when
they contributed the constitution was divinely inspired.
Suddenly some writing better than others.
And by the way, that is not what the separation of church and
state is about to go into the bill of rights, you can't establish religion.
And for a woman who in the first clip that you showed talked about all these libs,
think it's in the constitution, but it's not.
It's just in this letter,
she goes on to cite stuff from the Declaration of Independence.
And so the ignorance is all encompassing.
>> But does the ignorance even matter at this point, john I mean,
they have a Supreme Court set up with theocrats who want this country to be.
>> Yeah, no the prohibition now against abortion, that is this is what they want.
This is founded in their misconceptions about the bible,
it's not actually representative what the bible says, but they think it is.
And they certainly like that the side effect is that a lot of people's rights
are stripped away, that's what religion is for for these people.
You'll notice that when they come to Jesus, it never means that for
the rest of their life, they spend a lot of time looking inward and
trying to make sure that they're better people.
Why is it that she's so awful, so enthusiastically awful.
Where is the compassion one can read a bit about Jesus and you're supposed to come
away with the idea that he was kind of a compassionate person.
You don't see that, not to say that some Christians don't.
My grandfather Pat was he was a liberal Christian and he believed in charity and
understanding empathy.
There are lots of people who do that.
>> [CROSSTALK] >> But
the people who talk the most about their religion, especially when they're running
for office, that is not what their religion is about.
Their religion is a card that's supposed to demonstrate that they're
better than you.
By definition never by action.
The actions are irrelevant now, they've got the card,
they can stand next to a priest or something.
No and Look, they also need to understand that while they have that advantage in
the Supreme Court, they also, on some level know that this is not popular.
It's one of the reasons why they're not actively talking as much about trying to
outlaw abortion nationally.
Only 12% of the country actually wants that they want to deliver for their base,
which gets them through Republican primaries, this theocratic state.
But they know that that's not a path to winning presidential elections or
anything like that.
>> Yeah and look, I just wanna make one final comment that was an excellent rent,
agree with everything you just said there.
But in that compilation that we showed you Janine Piro is like, wow,
why are values considered extremists?
Yeah, it's extremist when we have a Supreme Court justice amusing about
whether or not married couples are having anal sex and whether or
not we should allow states to ban it.
It's extremists, that is extremist, you weird or drunk, It is extremist, okay.
It is extremist, when you have the government getting in between a woman and
her doctor, that is extremist.
In fact, they used to think that was extremists when they would use
that talking point inaccurately, when it came to the Affordable Care Act,
they thought it was super extremist, right.
It's amazing man, these people are disgusting.
They hate this country, they hate freedom and they wanna control everything, we do.
The only time they're actually legitimate and not legitimate, but
being sincere about small government is when it comes to the wealthiest people and
the biggest corporations in this country robbing us blind.
That's when they want no government intervention,
they don't want the government to protect you from anything.
But they do want the government to do away with your liberty,
including what you do in the confines of your own home with your own partner.
They hate this country, they hate freedom, they wanna control you.
And I think that's pretty extremist