AS RUSSIA‘S ATTACKS ON
AS RUSSIA‘S ATTACKS ON UKRAINE, ESCALATE
AS RUSSIA‘S ATTACKS ON UKRAINE, ESCALATE ONE EVENT FROM RECENT
UKRAINE, ESCALATE ONE EVENT FROM RECENT US. HISTORY IS BEGINNING TO
ONE EVENT FROM RECENT US. HISTORY IS BEGINNING TO STAND OUT AS
US. HISTORY IS BEGINNING TO STAND OUT AS EVEN MORE PIVOTAL THAN WE
STAND OUT AS EVEN MORE PIVOTAL THAN WE ACTUALLY
EVEN MORE PIVOTAL THAN WE ACTUALLY REALIZED AT THE TIME
ACTUALLY REALIZED AT THE TIME AND THAT IS
REALIZED AT THE TIME AND THAT IS FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD
AND THAT IS FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP‘S FIRST
FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP‘S FIRST IMPEACHMENT
TRUMP‘S FIRST IMPEACHMENT JUST TO REFRESH HER
IMPEACHMENT JUST TO REFRESH HER RECOLLECTION
JUST TO REFRESH HER RECOLLECTION TRUMP‘S CHARGES STEM FROM A
RECOLLECTION TRUMP‘S CHARGES STEM FROM A PHONE CALL
TRUMP‘S CHARGES STEM FROM A PHONE CALL WITH UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT
PHONE CALL WITH UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT ZIELINSKI. THE SAME ZIELINSKI,
WITH UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT ZIELINSKI. THE SAME ZIELINSKI, WE KNOW,
ZIELINSKI. THE SAME ZIELINSKI, WE KNOW, ALL RECOGNIZE AS A BRAVE
WE KNOW, ALL RECOGNIZE AS A BRAVE LEADER, STANDING UP TO
ALL RECOGNIZE AS A BRAVE LEADER, STANDING UP TO VLADIMIR PUTIN IN JULY OF
LEADER, STANDING UP TO VLADIMIR PUTIN IN JULY OF 2019. TRUMP PRESSURE
VLADIMIR PUTIN IN JULY OF 2019. TRUMP PRESSURE ZIELINSKI TO DIG UP
2019. TRUMP PRESSURE ZIELINSKI TO DIG UP INFORMATION
ZIELINSKI TO DIG UP INFORMATION ON THEN-PRESIDENTIAL
INFORMATION ON THEN-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE. JOE BIDEN. TRUMP
ON THEN-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE. JOE BIDEN. TRUMP HELD HOSTAGE, NEARLY
CANDIDATE. JOE BIDEN. TRUMP HELD HOSTAGE, NEARLY 400 MILLION DOLLARS
HELD HOSTAGE, NEARLY 400 MILLION DOLLARS IN SECURITY AGE FOR UKRAINE.
400 MILLION DOLLARS IN SECURITY AGE FOR UKRAINE. THIS WAS MILITARY FUNDING. WE
IN SECURITY AGE FOR UKRAINE. THIS WAS MILITARY FUNDING. WE NOW KNOW WITHOUT A DOUBT
THIS WAS MILITARY FUNDING. WE NOW KNOW WITHOUT A DOUBT THAT UKRAINE NEEDED REALLY,
NOW KNOW WITHOUT A DOUBT THAT UKRAINE NEEDED REALLY, REALLY BADLY TO FEND OFF
THAT UKRAINE NEEDED REALLY, REALLY BADLY TO FEND OFF RUSSIA,
REALLY BADLY TO FEND OFF RUSSIA, ALL THE WHILE
RUSSIA, ALL THE WHILE DONALD TRUMP. HE WAS CLOSING
ALL THE WHILE DONALD TRUMP. HE WAS CLOSING UP TO VLADIMIR PUTIN.
DONALD TRUMP. HE WAS CLOSING UP TO VLADIMIR PUTIN. THE AID WAS EVENTUALLY GIVEN
UP TO VLADIMIR PUTIN. THE AID WAS EVENTUALLY GIVEN TO
THE AID WAS EVENTUALLY GIVEN TO UKRAINE AND
TO UKRAINE AND UMP WAS ACQUITTED OF ALL THE
UKRAINE AND UMP WAS ACQUITTED OF ALL THE CHARGES
UMP WAS ACQUITTED OF ALL THE CHARGES IN FEBRUARY OF 2020
CHARGES IN FEBRUARY OF 2020 AND IN HER LATEST OPINION
IN FEBRUARY OF 2020 AND IN HER LATEST OPINION PIECE FOR MSNBC, LEGAL
AND IN HER LATEST OPINION PIECE FOR MSNBC, LEGAL ANALYST, JOYCE
PIECE FOR MSNBC, LEGAL ANALYST, JOYCE FANS WARNS AMERICANS.
ANALYST, JOYCE FANS WARNS AMERICANS. DO NOT FORGET
FANS WARNS AMERICANS. DO NOT FORGET THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT. SHE
DO NOT FORGET THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT. SHE SAYS THAT
THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT. SHE SAYS THAT HAD TRUMP WON IN
SAYS THAT HAD TRUMP WON IN 2020. HE QUOTE
HAD TRUMP WON IN 2020. HE QUOTE COULD HAVE FULLY
2020. HE QUOTE COULD HAVE FULLY DIDN‘T DENUDED
COULD HAVE FULLY DIDN‘T DENUDED NATO
DIDN‘T DENUDED NATO ENTERED INTO
NATO ENTERED INTO JOINT CYBER
ENTERED INTO JOINT CYBER AGREEMENTS WITH MOSCOW
JOINT CYBER AGREEMENTS WITH MOSCOW AND STOOD BACK AS PUTIN
AGREEMENTS WITH MOSCOW AND STOOD BACK AS PUTIN CAUSED DEVASTATION
AND STOOD BACK AS PUTIN CAUSED DEVASTATION ACROSS, UKRAINE.
CAUSED DEVASTATION ACROSS, UKRAINE. JOINING ME NOW IS JOYCE VANCE?
ACROSS, UKRAINE. JOINING ME NOW IS JOYCE VANCE? SO
JOINING ME NOW IS JOYCE VANCE? SO JOYCE, I‘VE BEEN OBSESSED WITH
SO JOYCE, I‘VE BEEN OBSESSED WITH THIS BECAUSE
JOYCE, I‘VE BEEN OBSESSED WITH THIS BECAUSE I THINK THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT
THIS BECAUSE I THINK THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT GETS LOST BECAUSE
I THINK THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT GETS LOST BECAUSE THERE WERE TWO IMPEACHMENTS IN
GETS LOST BECAUSE THERE WERE TWO IMPEACHMENTS IN ONE TERM FOR THE PRESIDENT.
THERE WERE TWO IMPEACHMENTS IN ONE TERM FOR THE PRESIDENT. BUT THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT
ONE TERM FOR THE PRESIDENT. BUT THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT NOW
BUT THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT NOW LOOKING AT IT WITH
NOW LOOKING AT IT WITH NEW NEW FACTS
LOOKING AT IT WITH NEW NEW FACTS ESSENTIALLY IN
NEW NEW FACTS ESSENTIALLY IN THE REEF THE EVENTS OF RECENT
ESSENTIALLY IN THE REEF THE EVENTS OF RECENT WEEKS
THE REEF THE EVENTS OF RECENT WEEKS IT REMINDS US THAT
WEEKS IT REMINDS US THAT PRESIDENT SOLINSKY PLAYED A
IT REMINDS US THAT PRESIDENT SOLINSKY PLAYED A REALLY IMPORTANT ROLE IN THE
PRESIDENT SOLINSKY PLAYED A REALLY IMPORTANT ROLE IN THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT. HOW DO YOU
REALLY IMPORTANT ROLE IN THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT. HOW DO YOU INTERPRET HIS BEHAVIOR
FIRST IMPEACHMENT. HOW DO YOU INTERPRET HIS BEHAVIOR NOW, GIVEN
INTERPRET HIS BEHAVIOR NOW, GIVEN THE LATEST
NOW, GIVEN THE LATEST VENTS ON THE CALL WITH DONALD
THE LATEST VENTS ON THE CALL WITH DONALD TRUMP. WHEN WE LOOK BACK TO
VENTS ON THE CALL WITH DONALD TRUMP. WHEN WE LOOK BACK TO 2019
TRUMP. WHEN WE LOOK BACK TO 2019 WAS PRESIDENT SOLINSKY,
2019 WAS PRESIDENT SOLINSKY, FLATTERING TRUMP AS A SIGN OF
WAS PRESIDENT SOLINSKY, FLATTERING TRUMP AS A SIGN OF HIS DESPERATION FOR THAT
FLATTERING TRUMP AS A SIGN OF HIS DESPERATION FOR THAT AID AND FUNDING.
HIS DESPERATION FOR THAT AID AND FUNDING. YOU KNOW,
AID AND FUNDING. YOU KNOW, PRESIDENT ZELINSKY‘S ROLE IS
YOU KNOW, PRESIDENT ZELINSKY‘S ROLE IS TO BE THE LEADER OF UKRAINE
PRESIDENT ZELINSKY‘S ROLE IS TO BE THE LEADER OF UKRAINE AND HE HAS TO PLACE HIS
TO BE THE LEADER OF UKRAINE AND HE HAS TO PLACE HIS EMPHASIS ON
AND HE HAS TO PLACE HIS EMPHASIS ON UKRAINIAN INTERESTS. AND OF
EMPHASIS ON UKRAINIAN INTERESTS. AND OF COURSE,
UKRAINIAN INTERESTS. AND OF COURSE, UKRAINE
COURSE, UKRAINE GEOGRAPHICALLY AS VULNERABLE
UKRAINE GEOGRAPHICALLY AS VULNERABLE TO RUSSIA, THAT SORT OF A
GEOGRAPHICALLY AS VULNERABLE TO RUSSIA, THAT SORT OF A SILLY THING TO SAY. NOW
TO RUSSIA, THAT SORT OF A SILLY THING TO SAY. NOW BECAUSE WE SEE EVERY DAY A
SILLY THING TO SAY. NOW BECAUSE WE SEE EVERY DAY A DEMONSTRATION OF HOW REAL THAT
BECAUSE WE SEE EVERY DAY A DEMONSTRATION OF HOW REAL THAT THREAD IS. SO THE PROBLEM HE
DEMONSTRATION OF HOW REAL THAT THREAD IS. SO THE PROBLEM HE FOUND HIMSELF IN, WHEN THE
THREAD IS. SO THE PROBLEM HE FOUND HIMSELF IN, WHEN THE WHEN THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT
FOUND HIMSELF IN, WHEN THE WHEN THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT SAID TO HIM AS HE MADE
WHEN THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT SAID TO HIM AS HE MADE CLEAR, HIS INTENTION OF
SAID TO HIM AS HE MADE CLEAR, HIS INTENTION OF GETTING MORE SECURITY AIDE,
CLEAR, HIS INTENTION OF GETTING MORE SECURITY AIDE, BUT FIRST, I NEED A FAVOR. I
GETTING MORE SECURITY AIDE, BUT FIRST, I NEED A FAVOR. I NEED YOU TO HELP ME WITH THIS
BUT FIRST, I NEED A FAVOR. I NEED YOU TO HELP ME WITH THIS LITTLE
NEED YOU TO HELP ME WITH THIS LITTLE POLITICAL.
LITTLE POLITICAL. EXCURSION, I‘M HAVING IN THE
POLITICAL. EXCURSION, I‘M HAVING IN THE UNITED STATES AND TRUMP
EXCURSION, I‘M HAVING IN THE UNITED STATES AND TRUMP WAS ESSENTIALLY WILLING TO
UNITED STATES AND TRUMP WAS ESSENTIALLY WILLING TO THROW AWAY,
WAS ESSENTIALLY WILLING TO THROW AWAY, UKRAINE‘S SECURITY INTERESTS,
THROW AWAY, UKRAINE‘S SECURITY INTERESTS, WHICH HAVE A LOT TO DO WITH
UKRAINE‘S SECURITY INTERESTS, WHICH HAVE A LOT TO DO WITH OUR OWN
WHICH HAVE A LOT TO DO WITH OUR OWN ONTO THE
OUR OWN ONTO THE HEAP, SO THAT TRUMP COULD TRY
ONTO THE HEAP, SO THAT TRUMP COULD TRY TO WIN RE-ELECTION. HE WAS AT
HEAP, SO THAT TRUMP COULD TRY TO WIN RE-ELECTION. HE WAS AT THAT POINT
TO WIN RE-ELECTION. HE WAS AT THAT POINT DESPERATELY CONCERNED THAT JOE
THAT POINT DESPERATELY CONCERNED THAT JOE BIDEN WOULD BE THE STRONGEST
DESPERATELY CONCERNED THAT JOE BIDEN WOULD BE THE STRONGEST DEMOCRATIC
BIDEN WOULD BE THE STRONGEST DEMOCRATIC CONTENDER AND HE ASKED THE
DEMOCRATIC CONTENDER AND HE ASKED THE UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT IN ESSENCE
CONTENDER AND HE ASKED THE UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT IN ESSENCE TO ANNOUNCE A CORRUPTION
UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT IN ESSENCE TO ANNOUNCE A CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION
TO ANNOUNCE A CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION INTO BIDEN. AND THAT
INVESTIGATION INTO BIDEN. AND THAT INVESTIGATION. IT‘S WORTH
INTO BIDEN. AND THAT INVESTIGATION. IT‘S WORTH UNDERLINING. ZERLINA WAS
INVESTIGATION. IT‘S WORTH UNDERLINING. ZERLINA WAS WHOLLY. UNFOUNDED
UNDERLINING. ZERLINA WAS WHOLLY. UNFOUNDED THERE‘S A TIMELINE OF
WHOLLY. UNFOUNDED THERE‘S A TIMELINE OF FACTS THERE.
THERE‘S A TIMELINE OF FACTS THERE. AND TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CRAFT
FACTS THERE. AND TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CRAFT SOMETHING
AND TRUMP WAS TRYING TO CRAFT SOMETHING WEIRD WITH RUDY GIULIANI AND
SOMETHING WEIRD WITH RUDY GIULIANI AND IT SIMPLY MAKES NO SENSE. IT
WEIRD WITH RUDY GIULIANI AND IT SIMPLY MAKES NO SENSE. IT WAS A BOGUS SORT OF AN
IT SIMPLY MAKES NO SENSE. IT WAS A BOGUS SORT OF AN ALLEGATION,
WAS A BOGUS SORT OF AN ALLEGATION, THE KIND OF THING THAT WE‘VE
ALLEGATION, THE KIND OF THING THAT WE‘VE SEEN THE FORMER PRESIDENT
THE KIND OF THING THAT WE‘VE SEEN THE FORMER PRESIDENT DO MANY, MANY TIMES. AND SO
SEEN THE FORMER PRESIDENT DO MANY, MANY TIMES. AND SO PRESIDENT ZIELINSKI WITH THE
DO MANY, MANY TIMES. AND SO PRESIDENT ZIELINSKI WITH THE INTERESTS OF HIS OWN COUNTRY
PRESIDENT ZIELINSKI WITH THE INTERESTS OF HIS OWN COUNTRY AT HEART COULD HAVE EASILY
INTERESTS OF HIS OWN COUNTRY AT HEART COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN SUCKED INTO THAT
AT HEART COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN SUCKED INTO THAT SORT OF A SCHEME THAT
BEEN SUCKED INTO THAT SORT OF A SCHEME THAT TELLS US A LOT ABOUT THE
SORT OF A SCHEME THAT TELLS US A LOT ABOUT THE FORMER
TELLS US A LOT ABOUT THE FORMER PRESIDENTS CHARACTER AND HIS
FORMER PRESIDENTS CHARACTER AND HIS WILLINGNESS TO SUPPLANT HIS
PRESIDENTS CHARACTER AND HIS WILLINGNESS TO SUPPLANT HIS OWN PERSONAL POLITICAL GOALS.
WILLINGNESS TO SUPPLANT HIS OWN PERSONAL POLITICAL GOALS. IN PLACE OF OUR COUNTRY‘S BEST
OWN PERSONAL POLITICAL GOALS. IN PLACE OF OUR COUNTRY‘S BEST INTERESTS.
IN PLACE OF OUR COUNTRY‘S BEST INTERESTS. I LIKE I BELIEVE THE LINE ONE.
INTERESTS. I LIKE I BELIEVE THE LINE ONE. I NEED YOU TO DO A FAVOR
I LIKE I BELIEVE THE LINE ONE. I NEED YOU TO DO A FAVOR THOUGH,
I NEED YOU TO DO A FAVOR THOUGH, WHICH WHEN YOU‘RE ASKING FOR
THOUGH, WHICH WHEN YOU‘RE ASKING FOR DEFENSIVE MILITARY AID
WHICH WHEN YOU‘RE ASKING FOR DEFENSIVE MILITARY AID DOESN‘T SEEM LIKE THEIR
DEFENSIVE MILITARY AID DOESN‘T SEEM LIKE THEIR RESPONSE. YOU WOULD LIKE AS A
DOESN‘T SEEM LIKE THEIR RESPONSE. YOU WOULD LIKE AS A PRESIDENT
RESPONSE. YOU WOULD LIKE AS A PRESIDENT SPEAKING TO ANOTHER PRESIDENT.
PRESIDENT SPEAKING TO ANOTHER PRESIDENT. I WANT TO PLAY YOU SOME SOUND
SPEAKING TO ANOTHER PRESIDENT. I WANT TO PLAY YOU SOME SOUND FROM THAT
I WANT TO PLAY YOU SOME SOUND FROM THAT IMPEACHMENT
FROM THAT IMPEACHMENT TRIAL FROM FORMER US
IMPEACHMENT TRIAL FROM FORMER US AMBASSADOR TO
TRIAL FROM FORMER US AMBASSADOR TO UKRAINE WERE JOVANOVIC
AMBASSADOR TO UKRAINE WERE JOVANOVIC THAT THIS IS ALL WAY BACK IN
UKRAINE WERE JOVANOVIC THAT THIS IS ALL WAY BACK IN 2019. SHE APPEARED BEFORE
THAT THIS IS ALL WAY BACK IN 2019. SHE APPEARED BEFORE THE HOUSE AND PIETSCHMANN
2019. SHE APPEARED BEFORE THE HOUSE AND PIETSCHMANN INQUIRY. NOT AT NOT AT THE
THE HOUSE AND PIETSCHMANN INQUIRY. NOT AT NOT AT THE TRIAL. EXCUSE ME, AT THE
INQUIRY. NOT AT NOT AT THE TRIAL. EXCUSE ME, AT THE HOUSE, IMPEACHMENT
TRIAL. EXCUSE ME, AT THE HOUSE, IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.
HOUSE, IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. NOW,
INQUIRY. NOW, UKRAINE IS A BATTLEGROUND FOR
NOW, UKRAINE IS A BATTLEGROUND FOR GREAT POWER
UKRAINE IS A BATTLEGROUND FOR GREAT POWER COMPETITION WITH A HOT WAR FOR
GREAT POWER COMPETITION WITH A HOT WAR FOR THE CONTROL OF TERRITORY IN A
COMPETITION WITH A HOT WAR FOR THE CONTROL OF TERRITORY IN A HYBRID WAR
THE CONTROL OF TERRITORY IN A HYBRID WAR TO CONTROL UKRAINE‘S,
HYBRID WAR TO CONTROL UKRAINE‘S, LEADERSHIP
TO CONTROL UKRAINE‘S, LEADERSHIP SUPPORTING UKRAINE IS THE
LEADERSHIP SUPPORTING UKRAINE IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO. IT‘S ALSO
SUPPORTING UKRAINE IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO. IT‘S ALSO THE SMART THING TO DO,
RIGHT THING TO DO. IT‘S ALSO THE SMART THING TO DO, IF RUSSIA PREVAILS
THE SMART THING TO DO, IF RUSSIA PREVAILS AND UKRAINE FALLS TO RUSSIAN
IF RUSSIA PREVAILS AND UKRAINE FALLS TO RUSSIAN DOMINION.
AND UKRAINE FALLS TO RUSSIAN DOMINION. WE CAN EXPECT TO SEE
DOMINION. WE CAN EXPECT TO SEE OTHER ATTEMPTS BY
WE CAN EXPECT TO SEE OTHER ATTEMPTS BY RUSSIA TO EXPAND ITS
OTHER ATTEMPTS BY RUSSIA TO EXPAND ITS TERRITORY
RUSSIA TO EXPAND ITS TERRITORY AND ITS
TERRITORY AND ITS INFLUENCE.
AND ITS INFLUENCE. I‘M TELLING YOU THIS FIRST
INFLUENCE. I‘M TELLING YOU THIS FIRST IMPEACHMENT. IT IS LIKE IT‘S
I‘M TELLING YOU THIS FIRST IMPEACHMENT. IT IS LIKE IT‘S SO EERIE. IT ALMOST GIVES YOU
IMPEACHMENT. IT IS LIKE IT‘S SO EERIE. IT ALMOST GIVES YOU GOOSEBUMPS WHEN YOU WATCH IT
SO EERIE. IT ALMOST GIVES YOU GOOSEBUMPS WHEN YOU WATCH IT BACK. NOW,
GOOSEBUMPS WHEN YOU WATCH IT BACK. NOW, KNOWING HOW EVERYTHING
BACK. NOW, KNOWING HOW EVERYTHING UNFOLD UNFOLD, IT UP TO THIS
POINT. WHAT‘S YOUR REACTION TO
POINT. WHAT‘S YOUR REACTION TO THAT?
POINT. WHAT‘S YOUR REACTION TO THAT? WHY DIDN‘T WE TAKE HER
THAT? WHY DIDN‘T WE TAKE HER WARNING? SERIOUSLY,
WHY DIDN‘T WE TAKE HER WARNING? SERIOUSLY, THIS
WARNING? SERIOUSLY, THIS THIS IS A SUBJECT MATTER
THIS THIS IS A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT TELLING US WHAT WE
THIS IS A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT TELLING US WHAT WE NEEDED TO KNOW, AND THE
EXPERT TELLING US WHAT WE NEEDED TO KNOW, AND THE REALITY IS THAT JUST LIKE
NEEDED TO KNOW, AND THE REALITY IS THAT JUST LIKE UKRAINE‘S. PRESIDENT IS
REALITY IS THAT JUST LIKE UKRAINE‘S. PRESIDENT IS WORRIED ABOUT HIS COUNTRY‘S
UKRAINE‘S. PRESIDENT IS WORRIED ABOUT HIS COUNTRY‘S INTERESTS. THE AMERICAN
WORRIED ABOUT HIS COUNTRY‘S INTERESTS. THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT SHOULD BE WORRIED
INTERESTS. THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT SHOULD BE WORRIED ABOUT AMERICA‘S INTERESTS
PRESIDENT SHOULD BE WORRIED ABOUT AMERICA‘S INTERESTS SOMETIMES THAT‘S MEANT THAT
ABOUT AMERICA‘S INTERESTS SOMETIMES THAT‘S MEANT THAT WE‘VE SENT
SOMETIMES THAT‘S MEANT THAT WE‘VE SENT SUPPLIES THAT WE‘VE SENT
WE‘VE SENT SUPPLIES THAT WE‘VE SENT MILITARY AID,
SUPPLIES THAT WE‘VE SENT MILITARY AID, OTHER TIMES. IT MEANS THAT
MILITARY AID, OTHER TIMES. IT MEANS THAT WE‘VE BEEN MORE RETICENT, BUT
OTHER TIMES. IT MEANS THAT WE‘VE BEEN MORE RETICENT, BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT HERE
WE‘VE BEEN MORE RETICENT, BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT HERE IS THAT AMERICA SHOULD MAKE
THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT HERE IS THAT AMERICA SHOULD MAKE ITS DECISIONS ON THE
IS THAT AMERICA SHOULD MAKE ITS DECISIONS ON THE BASIS OF AMERICA‘S BEST
ITS DECISIONS ON THE BASIS OF AMERICA‘S BEST INTERESTS ON THE BASIS OF
BASIS OF AMERICA‘S BEST INTERESTS ON THE BASIS OF FOREIGN POLICY AND OUR
INTERESTS ON THE BASIS OF FOREIGN POLICY AND OUR NATIONAL
FOREIGN POLICY AND OUR NATIONAL US
NATIONAL US THE FACTS THAT GIVE RISE TO
US THE FACTS THAT GIVE RISE TO THE FIRST
THE FACTS THAT GIVE RISE TO THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT, SHOW THAT TRUMP
THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT, SHOW THAT TRUMP WAS MAKING FOREIGN POLICY
IMPEACHMENT, SHOW THAT TRUMP WAS MAKING FOREIGN POLICY ON THE BASIS OF WHAT WAS GOOD
WAS MAKING FOREIGN POLICY ON THE BASIS OF WHAT WAS GOOD FOR TRUMP. TRUMP WAS
ON THE BASIS OF WHAT WAS GOOD FOR TRUMP. TRUMP WAS TRYING TO WIN RE-ELECTION
FOR TRUMP. TRUMP WAS TRYING TO WIN RE-ELECTION AND USE UKRAINE TO GET
TRYING TO WIN RE-ELECTION AND USE UKRAINE TO GET HIM THERE. HE WASN‘T WORKING
AND USE UKRAINE TO GET HIM THERE. HE WASN‘T WORKING BASED ON WHAT WAS GOOD FOR THE
HIM THERE. HE WASN‘T WORKING BASED ON WHAT WAS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY. HE WAS WORKING
BASED ON WHAT WAS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY. HE WAS WORKING BASED ON WHAT‘S GOOD FOR HIM
COUNTRY. HE WAS WORKING BASED ON WHAT‘S GOOD FOR HIM AND THAT‘S A CAUTIONARY TALE
BASED ON WHAT‘S GOOD FOR HIM AND THAT‘S A CAUTIONARY TALE BECAUSE FRANKLY HAD TRUMP WON
AND THAT‘S A CAUTIONARY TALE BECAUSE FRANKLY HAD TRUMP WON RE-ELECTION.
BECAUSE FRANKLY HAD TRUMP WON RE-ELECTION. WE COULD HAVE BEEN IN A
RE-ELECTION. WE COULD HAVE BEEN IN A SITUATION WHERE RUSSIA COULD
WE COULD HAVE BEEN IN A SITUATION WHERE RUSSIA COULD HAVE INVADED UKRAINE
SITUATION WHERE RUSSIA COULD HAVE INVADED UKRAINE AND TRUMP MAKING DECISIONS
HAVE INVADED UKRAINE AND TRUMP MAKING DECISIONS BASED ON WHAT WAS GOOD
AND TRUMP MAKING DECISIONS BASED ON WHAT WAS GOOD MIGHT HAVE HAD A VERY
BASED ON WHAT WAS GOOD MIGHT HAVE HAD A VERY DIFFERENT REACTION THAN THE
MIGHT HAVE HAD A VERY DIFFERENT REACTION THAN THE I DIDN‘T HAS HAD IN BRINGING
DIFFERENT REACTION THAN THE I DIDN‘T HAS HAD IN BRINGING TOGETHER
I DIDN‘T HAS HAD IN BRINGING TOGETHER NATO, GOING TO HELP OUR
TOGETHER NATO, GOING TO HELP OUR LONGTIME ALLY AND STRATEGIC
NATO, GOING TO HELP OUR LONGTIME ALLY AND STRATEGIC UKRAINE.
LONGTIME ALLY AND STRATEGIC UKRAINE. IT‘S ACTUALLY QUITE HORRIFYING
UKRAINE. IT‘S ACTUALLY QUITE HORRIFYING THOUGHT
IT‘S ACTUALLY QUITE HORRIFYING THOUGHT TO THINK ABOUT WAKING UP TO
THOUGHT TO THINK ABOUT WAKING UP TO THE NEWS OF
TO THINK ABOUT WAKING UP TO THE NEWS OF HOSPITALS, BEING BOMBED AND
THE NEWS OF HOSPITALS, BEING BOMBED AND MATERNITY WARDS AND THEN
HOSPITALS, BEING BOMBED AND MATERNITY WARDS AND THEN REMEMBERING THE BAD THINGS
MATERNITY WARDS AND THEN REMEMBERING THE BAD THINGS DONALD TRUMP SAID ABOUT NATO
REMEMBERING THE BAD THINGS DONALD TRUMP SAID ABOUT NATO AS OPPOSED TO SAYING BAD
DONALD TRUMP SAID ABOUT NATO AS OPPOSED TO SAYING BAD THINGS ABOUT VLADIMIR PUTIN.
AS OPPOSED TO SAYING BAD THINGS ABOUT VLADIMIR PUTIN. WHO IS DOING THAT BOMBING
THINGS ABOUT VLADIMIR PUTIN. WHO IS DOING THAT BOMBING REPUBLICANS?
WHO IS DOING THAT BOMBING REPUBLICANS? DURING THAT FIRST
REPUBLICANS? DURING THAT FIRST IMPEACHMENT.
DURING THAT FIRST IMPEACHMENT. THEY STOOD BY DONALD TRUMP.
IMPEACHMENT. THEY STOOD BY DONALD TRUMP. THEY STOOD BY HIS DECISION TO
THEY STOOD BY DONALD TRUMP. THEY STOOD BY HIS DECISION TO WITHHOLD THAT FUNDING FOR
THEY STOOD BY HIS DECISION TO WITHHOLD THAT FUNDING FOR UKRAINE.
WITHHOLD THAT FUNDING FOR UKRAINE. AND NOW IN
UKRAINE. AND NOW IN 2022,
AND NOW IN 2022, THEY‘RE CRITICIZING, JOE BIDEN
2022, THEY‘RE CRITICIZING, JOE BIDEN FOR NOT DOING MORE
THEY‘RE CRITICIZING, JOE BIDEN FOR NOT DOING MORE AND BEING TOUGH.
FOR NOT DOING MORE AND BEING TOUGH. UKRAINE, I MEAN
AND BEING TOUGH. UKRAINE, I MEAN HE‘S PROVIDING 800 MILLION
UKRAINE, I MEAN HE‘S PROVIDING 800 MILLION DOLLARS ALREADY
HE‘S PROVIDING 800 MILLION DOLLARS ALREADY IN MILITARY SPENDING. I MEAN,
DOLLARS ALREADY IN MILITARY SPENDING. I MEAN, DO YOU THINK THAT
IN MILITARY SPENDING. I MEAN, DO YOU THINK THAT THEY SHOULD BE CALLED OUT AND
DO YOU THINK THAT THEY SHOULD BE CALLED OUT AND MORE FORCEFUL TERMS?
THEY SHOULD BE CALLED OUT AND MORE FORCEFUL TERMS? TERMS, GIVEN THE FACT THAT
MORE FORCEFUL TERMS? TERMS, GIVEN THE FACT THAT A LOT OF THEM ACTED VERY
TERMS, GIVEN THE FACT THAT A LOT OF THEM ACTED VERY EMOTIONAL AND MOVE TODAY BY
A LOT OF THEM ACTED VERY EMOTIONAL AND MOVE TODAY BY THE
EMOTIONAL AND MOVE TODAY BY THE PRESIDENT‘S REMARKS,
THE PRESIDENT‘S REMARKS, BUT WE REMEMBER WHAT THEY SAID
PRESIDENT‘S REMARKS, BUT WE REMEMBER WHAT THEY SAID IN 2019.
BUT WE REMEMBER WHAT THEY SAID IN 2019. I THINK THAT THERE‘S A CERTAIN
IN 2019. I THINK THAT THERE‘S A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF NUANCE HERE AND
I THINK THAT THERE‘S A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF NUANCE HERE AND LOOK IT‘S DIFFICULT. WE‘VE
AMOUNT OF NUANCE HERE AND LOOK IT‘S DIFFICULT. WE‘VE BEEN DELUGED WITH JUST THIS
LOOK IT‘S DIFFICULT. WE‘VE BEEN DELUGED WITH JUST THIS CONSTANT NEW CYCLE FOR
BEEN DELUGED WITH JUST THIS CONSTANT NEW CYCLE FOR SIX OR SEVEN YEARS. NOW.
CONSTANT NEW CYCLE FOR SIX OR SEVEN YEARS. NOW. MAYBE IT‘S JUST BECAUSE WE‘VE
SIX OR SEVEN YEARS. NOW. MAYBE IT‘S JUST BECAUSE WE‘VE ALL BEEN VERY INVOLVED DURING
MAYBE IT‘S JUST BECAUSE WE‘VE ALL BEEN VERY INVOLVED DURING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION,
ALL BEEN VERY INVOLVED DURING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, BUT I DON‘T REMEMBER THE NEWS
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, BUT I DON‘T REMEMBER THE NEWS BEING THIS FAST AND
BUT I DON‘T REMEMBER THE NEWS BEING THIS FAST AND THERE BEING SO MUCH TO ABSORB.
BEING THIS FAST AND THERE BEING SO MUCH TO ABSORB. I DON‘T THINK WE CAN BLAME
THERE BEING SO MUCH TO ABSORB. I DON‘T THINK WE CAN BLAME AMERICANS WHO AREN‘T UP TO
I DON‘T THINK WE CAN BLAME AMERICANS WHO AREN‘T UP TO SPEED ON THE FACTS OF THE
AMERICANS WHO AREN‘T UP TO SPEED ON THE FACTS OF THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT. BUT
SPEED ON THE FACTS OF THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT. BUT ULTIMATELY WHAT IT SHOWS US
FIRST IMPEACHMENT. BUT ULTIMATELY WHAT IT SHOWS US AND WHAT IT REALLY
ULTIMATELY WHAT IT SHOWS US AND WHAT IT REALLY UNDERLINES IS THAT WE HAD A
AND WHAT IT REALLY UNDERLINES IS THAT WE HAD A PRESIDENT WHO WAS VERY CLOSE
UNDERLINES IS THAT WE HAD A PRESIDENT WHO WAS VERY CLOSE TO
POINT
POINT CONFISCATED, HIS
POINT CONFISCATED, HIS TRANSLATORS NOTE AND TOLD THE
CONFISCATED, HIS TRANSLATORS NOTE AND TOLD THE TRANSLATOR THAT THEY COULD NOT
TRANSLATORS NOTE AND TOLD THE TRANSLATOR THAT THEY COULD NOT REVEAL WHAT HE HAD TALKED
TRANSLATOR THAT THEY COULD NOT REVEAL WHAT HE HAD TALKED ABOUT WITH PUTIN. THAT WAS A
REVEAL WHAT HE HAD TALKED ABOUT WITH PUTIN. THAT WAS A PATTERN OVER THOSE TWO YEARS
ABOUT WITH PUTIN. THAT WAS A PATTERN OVER THOSE TWO YEARS 27 TO 29 TEEN
PATTERN OVER THOSE TWO YEARS 27 TO 29 TEEN WHERE TRUMP HAD FIVE
27 TO 29 TEEN WHERE TRUMP HAD FIVE FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS WITH
WHERE TRUMP HAD FIVE FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS WITH PUTIN AND THERE ARE NO NOTES
FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS WITH PUTIN AND THERE ARE NO NOTES NOT EVEN IN THE
PUTIN AND THERE ARE NO NOTES NOT EVEN IN THE CLASSIFIED SYSTEM ON WHAT THEY
NOT EVEN IN THE CLASSIFIED SYSTEM ON WHAT THEY DISCUSSED. SO IT‘S IMPORTANT
CLASSIFIED SYSTEM ON WHAT THEY DISCUSSED. SO IT‘S IMPORTANT FOR
DISCUSSED. SO IT‘S IMPORTANT FOR REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP, WHICH
FOR REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP, WHICH DIDN‘T VOTE FOR AN ABUSE OF
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP, WHICH DIDN‘T VOTE FOR AN ABUSE OF TRUST IN PIETSCHMANN TO
DIDN‘T VOTE FOR AN ABUSE OF TRUST IN PIETSCHMANN TO AT LEAST,
TRUST IN PIETSCHMANN TO AT LEAST, RECOGNIZE,
AT LEAST, RECOGNIZE, NOW, WHAT THE REALITY IS?
RECOGNIZE, NOW, WHAT THE REALITY IS? REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT
NOW, WHAT THE REALITY IS? REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT POINTS. I‘VE BEEN OBSESSED
REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT POINTS. I‘VE BEEN OBSESSED WITH THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT,
POINTS. I‘VE BEEN OBSESSED WITH THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT, NOW THAT WE HAVE
WITH THE FIRST IMPEACHMENT, NOW THAT WE HAVE A NEW SET OF FACTS
NOW THAT WE HAVE A NEW SET OF FACTS FOR OUR ANALYSIS, JOYCE
A NEW SET OF FACTS FOR OUR ANALYSIS, JOYCE FANS. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR