>>PORN PRODUCERS IN THE U.K.
CONTINUE TO DEAL WITH
REGULATIONS THEY FEEL ARE SEXIST AGAINST WOMEN BECAUSE THEY
SPECIFICALLY GO AFTER BDSM SCENES THAT INCLUDE WOMEN BEING
DOMINANT.
THIS IS INTERESTING, IT WAS A STORY THAT WAS RELEASED
A FEW YEARS AGO ABOUT THE NEW REGULATIONS REGARDING PORN IN
THE U.K., AND THEY HAVE BANNED THINGS LIKE FEMALE EJACULATION
BUT NOT MALA DECORATION, FACE SITTING, CANING, ANOTHER RAUNCHY
THINGS THAT HAPPENED DURING BDSM SCENES, BUT IT SEEMS AS THOUGH
THESE REGULATIONS AGAIN ARE TARGETED SPECIFICALLY TOWARD
WOMEN AND NOT NECESSARILY THE MALE PORN ACTORS.
A WOMAN IN THE
MIDDLE OF THIS CHAOS IS A PORN PRODUCER BY THE NAME OF PANDORA
BLAKE, SHE HAD A PORN SITE CALLED DREAMSOFSPANKING, WHERE
THERE WERE VIDEOS OF MEN BEING CANED, BECAUSE THAT'S THE TYPE
OF GENRE --
>>LET'S BE CLEAR, BECAUSE THEY DESERVED IT.
>>THEY WERE BAD, BAD BOYS.
>>THEY HAD IT COMING.
>>KEEP IN MIND, THESE ARE ADULT PORN ACTORS WHO HAVE CONSENTED
TO DOING THE SCENES, THIS IS A TYPE OF GENRE OR A TYPE OF
FETISH THAT LOTS OF PEOPLE OUT THERE ENJOY, AND ALSO, BOOKS
LIKE 50 SHADES OF GRAY WERE WILDLY POPULAR AND TURNED INTO
MOVIES, AND IDOLIZED BY ALL THE PEOPLE.
BUT FOR SOME REASON
THINGS LIKE FEMALE EJACULATION AND FACE SITTING ARE
INAPPROPRIATE IN THE U.K.
>> BONDAGE IN WHICH ALL FOUR LIMBS ARE RESTRICTED AND
SPANKING,
WHIPPING, OR CANING THAT LEAVES SIGNIFICANT MARKS, ARE ALL
THINGS THAT ARE BANNED, AND APPARENTLY THESE WERE DEPICTED
IN SOME OF HER PORN SCENES.
>> AGAIN, FOCUSED HEAVILY ON WOMEN.
>>LET'S BREAK THIS DOWN.
FIRST OF ALL, LET'S
BE FAIR, THE
FEMALE EJACULATION, IN ORDER TO VIOLATE THE RULES, MUST BE DONE
ON ANOTHER'S BODY, OR CONSUMED.
>>WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN?
ARE THEY TALKING SPECIFICALLY
ABOUT SQUIRTERS?
WHY IS THAT UNACCEPTABLE WHEN YOU DO IT ON A
DUDE, BUT IN PORN DUDES ARE CUMMING ON WOMEN'S FACES
CONSTANTLY?
>>THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THAT.
BUT I WAS GOOD TO SAY IS,
DONE ON ANOTHER PERSON'S BODY, YOU HAVE JUST DESCRIBED 99% OF
ALL PORN, WHAT MEN DO TO WOMEN.
THAT IS NOT BANNED IN THE U.K.
THEY ARE LIKE, FEMALE EJACULATION, WE ARE NOT AGAINST
WOMEN ORGASMING, BUT IF YOU DO IT ON THE PERSON, THAT IS BAD.
THIS KIND OF BDSM IS PERVERSION OR DEGRADATION, THEY SAID.
AND HOSTILE IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE.
>>HERE IS ANOTHER THING THEY HAVE NOT BANNED IN THE U.K.
--
I'M TRYING TO FIND PC WAYS OF SAYING THIS, I'M JUST GOING
TO SAY IT, WOMEN LITERALLY CHOKING ON MEN'S PENISES.
THAT IS OKAY.
>>THAT IS NOT DEGRADING.
>>BUT YOU CANE A MAN WHO WANTS IT AND THAT IS DEGRADING.
>>YOU MADE A WOMAN CUM AND SHE CAME ON A PART OF YOUR BODY,
THAT IS DEGRADING?
WHY DID YOU MAKE THE WOMAN CUM, PERVERT?
A
LOT OF THIS IS ABOUT THE SPANKING, THAT IS WHY I LOVE ONE
OF HER TITLES.
"SLIGHT DAMAGE TO THE REAR END."
>>SHE IS A CLASSY BDSM PRODUCER.
>>IT IS ONLY SLIGHT DAMAGE.
AND THAT GETS BANNED.
>>I HATE EVERY PART OF THESE U.K.
REGULATIONS.
REGULATIONS
SHOULD BE PUT IN PLACE TO KEEP PEOPLE SAFE AND IN THIS CASE IT
IS NOT ABOUT KEEPING PEOPLE SAFE, THEY ARE TWO CONSENTING
ADULTS WHO WANT TO DO THESE PORN SCENES, LET THEM.
THERE ARE LOTS
OF DEGRADING THINGS IN PORNOGRAPHY, RIGHT?
YOU CAN'T
DRAW A LINE THAT ONLY IMPACTS FEMALES IN THE PORN INDUSTRY.
THAT IS INSANE.
>> THERE ARE CLEAR LINES THAT SHOULDN'T BE CROSSED.
ANYTHING
NONCONSENSUAL, GONE.
THAT INCLUDES BY DEFINITION ANYTHING
UNDER AGE, BECAUSE THAT IS MY LAW NONCONSENSUAL.
THOSE ARE
OBVIOUS.
YOU DON'T WANT TO DEPICT RAPE IN PORN, I THINK
THAT IS A FAIR LAW.
YES YOU WILL HAVE SOME BOUNDARIES THERE AS TO
WHERE YOU DRAW THE LINE, BUT BDSM IS SO WITHIN THE MAINSTREAM
OF ACCEPTABLE FETISHES THAT, LIKE, IT IS LIKE THEY CAME OUT
OF THE 17TH CENTURY.
THEY ARE LIKE, WHAT IS THIS THING CALLED
SLIGHT DAMAGE TO THE REAR END?
A SPANKING ON YOUR BUTTOCKS?
THIS
IS SO TAME, THAT IS NOT ANYWHERE NEAR THE LINE.
NOW THERE IS AN
EXTRA BIT OF PERVERSION, IF YOU WILL, IN THIS LAW, THAT BY LAW
IN ENGLAND YOU CAN DO THIS BETWEEN CONSENTING ADULTS, YOU
JUST CAN'T DO IT ON TAPE NOW.
BUT WHAT IS NORMALLY THE RULE IS
THAT YOU CAN'T A WOMAN TO HAVE SEX WITH HER, BECAUSE THAT IS
PROSTITUTION, BUT YOU COULD PAY TO HAVE SEX WITH HER ON CAMERA
BECAUSE THAT IS PORN.
THEY HAVE FLIPPED THE IRONY, BOTH ARE
IRONIC, BUT IN THIS CASE THEY ARE LIKE YOU WANT TO DO IT IN
REAL LIFE, GO AHEAD, DO ANY DAMAGE YOU WANT TO YOUR REAR
END, BUT DON'T DO IT ON TAPE BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE ILLEGAL.
>>ALSO WHAT IS INTERESTING ABOUT THE U.K.
WHICH THANKFULLY WE
DON'T HAVE IN THE U.S. YET IS A REGULAR TRADE BODY THAT IMPACTS
WHAT CAN BE PUT ON THE INTERNET.
WE HAVE THE SEC THAT FOCUSES
PRIMARILY AND REALLY ONLY ON TV AND RADIO, THEY HAVEN'T VENTURED
INTO THE INTERNET YET.
BUT IN THE U.K.
THEY HAVE ALREADY
STARTED REGULATING WICKED PUTS ON THE INTERNET ESPECIALLY WITH
PORN.
JUST LET IT GO.
I THINK YOU GAVE CLEAR EXAMPLES OF WHAT
IS UNACCEPTABLE, BUT BDSM, IT IS WHAT IT IS.
THEY ARE CONSENTING
ADULTS, THEY WANT -- THEY WANT THAT LIGHT DAMAGE TO THE REAR
END.