I could have broken this up into 2 videos,
but I was so excited, I really didn't wanna wait.
also im gonna show you some fun graphology tricks
when you have 2 different samples
of handwriting from different people
and those can really help, especially if you're in a rut
and you don't really know where to begin when looking at someone's writing
so hopefully this helps
if thats the case for you
so here's Will's writing:
here's technos:
and disclaimer before I begin:
I know Techno doesn't want people closely analyzing his personal life,
so don't worry everyone, the analysis today
is not gonna get too deep.
I know nothing about his personal life.
I dont even know his real name.
my analyses describe what the writing would indicate
they don't necessarily describe the writer.
im just listing out the traits and what they would indicate
so I hope that makes sense
and I know sometimes my analyses do get kinda deep
but I always wanna respect boundaries
but if I accidentally do overstep boundaries
and a creator wanted my analysis on them taken down, id do it.
no questions asked
at the end of the day its just handwriting
I want people to feel safe
I know we talk about alot of things that are uncomfortable
I know we talk about a lot here
but I want everyone to feel safe on my channel
so lets talk about the writing
im not gonna grill anyone today in my analyses
a big part of that is because both guys' writing is
actually pretty plain, all things considered
-and what do I mean by plain?
I just mean there's not much deviation
from the copybook on how kids are taught to write
also neither writing is particularly illegible
both have really even zones,
both are of a comfortable size,
but I'll still talk about the traits that are showing up
Will's writing has a pretty wavy baseline so
some of this is due to not writing on lined paper,
and some of this is due to the page being crumpled
but if you look at the parts that aren't crunched
its still wavy, so wavy baselines
indicate not being emotionally grounded
this isn't necessarily a problem.
its quite normal to not be totally emotionally grounded so
no concern there
its more of a concern if you have other
emotionally unstable traits stacking up
next thing, there's no slant to the writing.
what that would indicate is
someone who's a bit more head-over-heart
someone who thinks through their actions,
someone who's a but more logically thinking
than someone with , say, a forward slant.
also his writing is disconnected
meaning he lifts the pen in-between each time he writes a new letter
which is a similar trait to the head-over-heart trait
in that the writer's more thoughtful,
but can also indicate a writer who's a bit less...
....socially......
like his social skills don't suck by any means,
but they're not like, award winning
then we have the missing i-dot
which indicates forgetfulness
and someone who isn't as detail oriented
that trait is the same for like the missing initial strokes on the m/n's
now that's what most graphology books will tell you
however I have met people who get so defensive when I say that
they'll claim they do it on purpose
they're like no I just don't put the i dot in because the i dot
is "stupid" of the n/m stroke is "stupid"
they say they don't do it for the sake of "efficiency"
so this could indicate to me someone
who forgets about the details or its just someone
who doesn't value the details?
I don't know. it looks to me like Will puts in the dots
everyone and a while so I'd hypothesize
he fall into the middle of both not being
as detail oriented, as well as being forgetful
next I see overall
the rhythm is just a bit... sloppy?
like forgive that unscientific term I'm using
but it is! its a bit sloppy, its a bit un-uniform
its not illegible by any means
-this would kindof indicate to me the writer is
most likely perfectly fine at communicating
perfectly fine at expressing what they need
but are they the most organized?
are they the most on-top-of-it?
responsible? neatest-whatever?
no they're not.
but that doesn't mean they aren't able to take care of themselves
and at least be responsible enough for one person
so thats Will's writing in a nutshell
you wanted a roast Will? thats what you got.
next, Technoblade!
sometimes people will assume that quick,
illegible writing is an indicator of high intelligence
and that can be true,
but actually its a sign of even higher intelligence
when the writing is done fast and is
still legible.
Techno's writing is clearly legible
more so than Will's,
however since I was not there when the writer was writing this
I can't really say for sure how
fast the writer was writing this so
techno could have the high speed, high legibility, high intelligence trait
but its hard to say
the writer's definitely not writing slow
I can show you some examples of what slow writing would actually look like
its all a bit more careful, a bit more round,
techno's writing does not fall into that category rhythmically
so if I were placing a bet
id bet he was writing quickly, so
he would have the high speed, high legibility, high intelligence trait
hes also a disconnected writer, like Will-
so: thoughtful, logical, thinks through his actions
hes got kindof an alternating slant
which would indicate moodiness
but overall its pretty straight up and down.
so, another logically thinking trait.
or whatever the middle ground is between
moodiness and logically thinking
I'd lean more towards logically thinking.
since the slant is pretty straight up and down,
plus we already have 2 other logically thinking traits.
so that makes the probability
that the writer is logically thinking that much higher.
and you might be thinking, "oh, Leah!
you watch technoblade so you know that he's a big brain
you're a cheater!"
but I swear I'm only looking at the traits
and the traits are showing an intelligent guy, so
...what do you want me to do
So smart, simple guy,
not to much crazy here happening here
with either of them actually
so this is where our fun games come in:D
Step 1, put the 2 samples of writing next to each other.
and you start asking some questions.
-I'll give you an example in a second-
the questions can be anything
you just need to make sure your answer is supported
in the writing
and this exercise is fun because it can be
used in a practical sense too,
like if say..
you're trying to figure out who committed a crime.
-thats a beefy example-
but if you're in that situation,
you would ask:okay
Between the 2 writing samples,
which writer is more discreet?
which writer is more intelligent?
which writer is more evasive?
of course I don't suggest solving a crime using
only handwriting.
this exercise can also just be plain old fun
to do with your friends
and you wanna practice some graphology, so
lets start. okay 1st question:
when you look at the 2 writing samples,
which writing would indicate someone
who could have 2 girlfriends?
do you have your hypothesis?
well I'll share mine.
I think Techno's writing would indicate a writer
who could manage having 2 girlfriends
I feel like this is the writing of someone who could remember
like who has the cat, and who's favorite color is what,
and who's birthday is on what day
I don't think Will's writing indicates someone who has the organizational skills
I don't even know if he could have 1
given how moody and sloppy the writing
would indicate the writer is.
I don't think Techno's writing indicates someone who could
have 6 girlfriends by any means,
but he could have 2
maybe 3 but probably not. probably just 2.
so thats kindof how you play the game
you can't just talk about of your bleep bloop
you have to use evidence in the writing
to support what your saying
sounds good? alright lets keep going
questions 2:given the writing
Who do you think has more subscribers?
okay this was a fun question.
when I first asked this question, I didn't know.
my hypothesis was, given the writing,
not given any outside knowledge,
because it takes more skill to write in this way:
and being a successful Youtuber, although it has a lot to do with luck,
it has alot to do with time management,
organization, discipline, ~strats~ if you will.
and techno's writing indicates a person
who has more of those qualities than Will's
writing would.
So I placed my hypothesis on Techno
that he would have more subscribers.
and yeah, we've got 5 ish mill,
versus 8 ish mill, so-
alright next question.
Who could kill someone?
Now please don't come at me in the commments like
"LEah yOu reAllY shOulDn't be tALking aBOut tHis"
then go watch a different video
do you wanna know how I got so good at graphology?
I ask weird questions like this.
ok but yeah...
have you came up with your answer?
I've come up with mine
Ithink Will's writing indicates a person
who could kill someone on accident
due to like lack of caution
just given that sloppiness in the rhythm
but technos writing indicates someone
who could kill someone, and get away with it.
like he's calculated and organized enough
however, I don't think he's fucked up morally to do that
just because there's
nothing concerning happening in his upper zones,
and the upper zones represent like thinking, mortality,
big brain stuff, so
there's nothing concerning happening in that upper zone
so I don't think he'd do it of his own accord,
but I think if the writer was put in a situation where
like they HAD to,
I think he could accomplish it.
kay, next question.
Who has the higher self esteem?
If you've watched my video's before,
you know for high selfesteem, you're either gonna
look at the t-bars, or you're gonna look at the personal pronoun I
and their t-bars are pretty neck-and-neck
so I'm gonna look at the personal pronoun I,
given what's in the writing,
it looks like will has the higher self-esteem
given his I's are larger than Techno's
however techno's writing indicates someone who's more emotionally grounded,
soo....
last question:
Who's writing indicates someone who's more likely to subscribe to my channel?
this is a funny question to me
Will?
I'd wonder if Techno, given all these logical traits
I'd wonder if techno'd be too skeptical of
graphology to subscribe?
or maybe he'd subscribe, but he'd only watch my true crime videos?
Or! or maybe Techno
would subscribe so he could analyze the handwriting of his enemies
and have a leg up that way
actually that does sound like something techno would do
but Will, given the writing,
given the emotional ungroundedness,
I think he would subscribe
and I'm not saying that because
I'm like "oh my subscribers are
emotionally ungrounded"
no I don't mean it like that
I mean it in that Ithink alot of my subscribers
are similar to myself in that
we don't totally understand our emotions
all the time, but we want to
and we want to understand how we are the way we are
we wanna understand why others are the way they are,
and that helps ground us
so yeah, Ithink Will's writing indicates a writer who's more likely to subscribe than Techno's
they would both subscribe I think, but
Ithink they would subscribe for different reasons
yeah :Dthank you for watching
I hope you have a good day!!!ok good bye <3