Since its release in 2016, Zootopia has captured the hearts of many with its charming characters,
thrilling plot, and underlying messages about society. And with the announcement of a sequel
by Disney, many fans are excited to see the world of Zootopia expanded further. With its
cute yet nuanced mythology, Zootopia has opened up the floodgates for speculative fan theories.
But which of these theories actually hold up to scrutiny? That’s what we’re looking at today.
I’m Kifinosi with WickedBinge and these are Zootopia Fan Theories B.S. to Truth Bomb
Let’s start with our first category. These theories either have so many
holes that they can’t possibly be true… they lack evidence… or
they’ve been confirmed false by creators. These Theories are B.S.
Starting out with: Zootopia a Future Where Animals Have Overthrown Humans.
As many have pointed out, Zootopia doesn't feature certain animals, such as primates, domestic cats,
dogs, cows, and horses. The theorist by name of Snak The Rpper on reddit suggests that this is
because they either resemble humans or have a close association with them. In the movie,
animals exhibit human-like characteristics, including opposable thumbs, modern clothing,
and bilingual communication. A popular theory suggests that
humans had advanced to the point where they created new mammals with human DNA,
inheriting beneficial traits such as bipedalism, speech, high cognitive abilities, and opposable
thumbs. These anthropomorphic animals eventually revolted against humanity, disgusted by how their
wild counterparts were treated, leading to the extermination of humanity. Over time,
interbreeding occurred between anthropomorphic and wild animals, resulting in the hybrid animals seen
in the movie. Aquatic mammals are not present in the film as no terrestrial-aquatic hybrids
were created due to physiological differences. The movie depicts mammal discrimination and
prejudice against predators in Zootopia's present day. It's suggested that after the
overthrow of humanity, similar but more intense bias would have existed against animals that
previously lived with humans. This would have led to the extermination of dogs, cats, horses,
cows, and primates by other species with extreme views, explaining their absence from the movie.
As compelling as this theory is… we have to classify it as B.S. because of the simple fact
that the first trailer referred to Zootopia as “a world where humans never existed”.
Let’s move onto the theory that the Animals in Zootopia May Have
Been Genetically Engineered by Humans. Let’s go over the evidence for this one:
First off: In the movie Zootopia, the term "evolved" is used constantly,
but it is incorrect. According to the theory of evolution, a creature must be intelligent, live
in an advanced social group, and consume whatever it can find in order to evolve. Additionally,
the idea that all animals in Zootopia could have evolved without competition for survival
is highly unlikely. If only a few animals evolved to become sentient, they would likely fight for
supremacy. For example, in Africa, lions were the dominant predators until humans hunted and
killed them. If there were two rival groups of monkeys, they would probably kill each other
for territory and food. Therefore, the animals in Zootopia did not evolve from their current
state on Earth to what they are in the movie. Secondly: If the animals in Zootopia did evolve,
there would likely be constant war, with species fighting against each other. Villages of rabbits
might kill each other for resources, and the farm owned by Judy's family in the movie would
have to have been established by another village. However, one of the writers was interviewed and
asked if Zootopia had ever fought a war. She responded that the animals would never fight
a war with each other, and that Zootopia was a peaceful place. They had no military,
only a large police force that served as their equivalent of an army. Zootopia was likely a
small city-state. Therefore, Zootopia breaks the laws of evolution and societal advancement.
With all that information, this theory suggests that: The animals in Zootopia
are likely human-animal hybrids, based on their physical characteristics. The Zootopians have
longer legs than their present-day counterparts, and if a dog were put upright, its legs would
snap because they are not built for walking upright. This suggests the presence of human DNA
But like our previous theory, we have to classify it as B.S. because of the
confirmation that humans never existed in this world… according to the trailer.
Moving on from the BS, these theories still have a lot of problems… Not enough
to say they’re completely debunked, but still... These Theories are Full of Holes.
It may surprise you to learn that the animated TV shows Robin Hood, TaleSpin, and
Zootopia Are All Connected, but perhaps not in the way you may have imagined...
These films, Robin Hood, TaleSpin, and Zootopia, share a unique connection that isn't what you
might expect. It's not that these worlds actually coexist, but rather it's the way that the animals
themselves are telling their stories and perceiving their world. What they have in
common is that they are full of anthropomorphic animals that have created human-like societies,
where normal animals coexist alongside them and humans seem to be nonexistent.
The animals in these worlds perform human activities, from running governments to flying
planes and solving crimes, with wild animals holding positions of power. For instance, foxes
are thieves who rob the rich to give to the poor, lions are kings living in castles, and sloths run
the DMV. In Robin Hood, wolves and vultures are part of the police force, while snakes
and lions make up the rest of the government. The opening narration of Robin Hood supports this
theory, with the rooster stating, "we folks of the animal kingdom have our own version,
the story of what really happened in Sherwood Forest," after the book opens and briefly shows
human knights, the only humans in the entire movie. Similarly, TaleSpin's name implies a
different version of the story, with Baloo telling Mowgli about his days flying a plane as they
float down the river in The Jungle Book. Zootopia, on the other hand, is like a
descendant of Robin Hood, where animals are super intelligent, and the crazy bunny character decides
to protect farm animals and pets from predators. This theory is certainly interesting… and we won’t
say that it’s impossible… But the general theme of “animals in a human-like world” is
a pretty simple one… so the comparison could just be coincidental. Then there’s also the
fact that Zootopia only includes Mammals, where Robin Hood includes other types of critters.
Moving onto: Disneyland exists in Zootopia The fact that bootleg Disney movies are being
sold in Zootopia hints at the existence of the Walt Disney Company and its associated
theme parks. Given that Zootopia is a city located near the ocean, much like Los Angeles,
it is not unreasonable to think that Disneyland or another Disney park may be located nearby.
Nick and Judy could potentially visit one of these parks for experimental purposes, but their
experience may be different from that of humans. For instance, if they were to ride Splash
Mountain, they would likely find the plot of the ride uncomfortable. The ride's storyline
involves Brer Fox trying to capture and eat Brer Rabbit, which could be seen as problematic in
a world where predator-prey relationships are a sensitive issue. However, it is also possible that
the ride has been adapted to be more inclusive and sensitive to the diverse population of Zootopia.
It could even be renamed and re-themed to remove any references to predator-prey relationships
and focus on a more general storyline. Regardless of whether they visit a Disney
park or not, the fact that bootleg Disney movies exist in Zootopia raises interesting
questions about the cultural impact of human society on the evolution of animal society.
It suggests that aspects of human culture and entertainment have been adopted and adapted by the
animal inhabitants of Zootopia, adding depth and complexity to the fictional world of the movie.
All that said, although we do see bootleg Disney movies, no evidence is shown of
Disneyland itself. So as much as we love the idea of it existing… This theory is all speculation.
With that said, we’re now into the middle category. Where we may be
stumble onto some truth… Maybe. These Theories are Possible.
The next theory centers around the idea that Zootopia and Sing Contrast
Socialistic and Capitalistic Forms of Government.
This theory, by reddit user demo kirby, discusses the differences between the
Zootopia and Sing universes in terms of their approach to government regulation and support
for their diverse animal populations. In Zootopia, the government provides adequate
regulations and services for its diverse population, including different biomes and
housing for different species. The main plot of Zootopia involves the government enforcing
diversity with Judy Hopps joining the police, despite opposition. Sing, on the other hand,
appears to have weak government regulation and support, with everything standardized
in size and few accommodations for different species. Individuals with enough money can get
modifications, but otherwise, animals must adjust to existing structures, which can be degrading.
While Zootopia is not perfect and animals that fall in between sizes often find things not
quite right, the government aims to make the city more inclusive despite public
attitudes. The main plot of Zootopia involves the government enforcing diversity, including
Judy Hopps with the police, despite opposition. Sing, on the other hand, appears to have weaker
government regulation and support for its population. Everything appears to be
standardized in size, including seating, steps, and housing. The only significant
sign of government accessibility is shown through waterways for aquatic life. Mike,
the Frank Sinatra mouse, has to travel using oversized stairs and doors, and Tori's (the
elephant) household is tiny in comparison to her family, including furniture. Rosita, the pig mom,
has 26 kids she needs to support with no hopes of babysitting and childcare because there are
no institutions in place to support animals due to their own natural reproduction. If an
individual has enough money in Sing, they can get modifications made for them, like Mike's sports
car, but it is still a "human" sized car, rather than having mouse-sized cars with infrastructure
to support them. This puts the burden on the individual to adjust to the existing structures,
which is even worse for those who are poor. The beings in Sing's world just accept these facts of
life without questioning them, and some even resort to degrading actions considered to be
"normal", like being a koala car wash sponge. Some commenters on the Reddit thread express
support for the theory, citing examples from the movies to support the idea that Zootopia
represents a more idealistic vision of a society where different species can coexist peacefully,
while Sing portrays a more dystopian society where economic inequality and social strife
are rampant. Others raise counterarguments, suggesting that the comparison oversimplifies the
complexities of the two movies and that both offer a nuanced portrayal of their respective worlds.
Zootopia and Sing offer a comparison of a more socialist society vs. a more centric
capitalist society when dealing with a extremely diverse population. : FanTheories (reddit.com)
These next conspiracies make a lot of sense. In fact,
we think they’re more likely to be true than not. These theories are Probable.
Here’s a relatable theory: The Cost of Rent in Zootopia is Exorbitantly High.
Nick Wilde claims to make "two hundred bucks a day, fluff!" which amounts to $72,000 a year
if he works seven days a week since he was twelve. However, he appears to live under a bridge despite
his substantial income. It's possible that he has PTSD or other issues that make it hard for
him to keep a dwelling. Alternatively, the rent in Zootopia might be incredibly high,
making it difficult for even those with a decent income to afford a comfortable living space.
To further support this theory, let's take a look at Judy. While we don't know how much she makes,
it's apparent that Zootopia is modeled after Los Angeles, where a new LAPD officer earns
around $63,000 a year. If we assume that Judy earns a similar amount, her small,
cramped studio apartment with thin walls and no private bathroom would be the best
she can afford. In fact, if Nick, who is relatively wealthy, can't afford rent,
then Judy might only be able to afford her apartment with the help of her family.
So, in summary, I believe that a studio apartment in Zootopia likely costs more than $5000 a month,
which explains why even characters like Nick and Judy struggle to find comfortable living spaces.
The theory proposed in the linked Reddit post suggests that the reason why some
predators in Zootopia are resorting to violent behavior is due to the fact that rent prices
in the city are extremely high, and that many predators cannot afford to live in
the safer, more expensive areas of Zootopia. Based on my knowledge of the Zootopia movie,
there is no explicit mention or confirmation of this theory. However, it is an interesting
and plausible interpretation of the events depicted in the movie, and it does align
with some of the themes and messages about prejudice, discrimination, and socioeconomic
inequality that are present in the film. Some commenters on the Reddit thread express
support for the theory, citing evidence from the movie to support the idea that predators may
face discrimination and economic disadvantage in Zootopia. Others raise counterarguments,
suggesting that the theory oversimplifies the issue and overlooks other factors that may
contribute to the conflict between predators and prey in the movie.
Overall, while the theory is not confirmed by official sources, it is a thought-provoking
interpretation of the movie's themes and has generated some interesting discussion among fans.
[Zootopia] The rent in Zootopia is obscenely high. : FanTheories (reddit.com)
Next: The Mafia is Responsible for There Being No Small Mammals in The Police Force
Disney's Zootopia has a significant plot inconsistency related to the size of its
police force. The movie establishes that small mammals are not allowed to join the police,
creating a hurdle for Judy, a rabbit, to become a police officer. However,
the city has animals ranging in size from a tiny vole to an enormous elephant,
making size a relative factor. Thus, a small rabbit like Judy is as towering
to a mouse as an elephant is to her. The problem arises from the extreme size
difference between a mouse and an elephant. The movie shows a rodent village in Zootopia,
which would be impossible to police effectively due to the size difference. Despite everyone
being equal in the city, the idea of a proportionate police force faces resistance.
One explanation for this could be the presence of a mafia controlled by a vole.
Since the police cannot properly handle the rodent population, organized crime thrives,
leading the rodents to discourage small mammals from joining the police. This cycle is broken
when Judy befriends a powerful mafia don, but it remains to be seen if it is a lasting solution.
Moving onto The Harsh Truth of the New Alliance between Predators and Prey
In the world of Zootopia, the once natural predator-prey relationship has given way to a
forced harmony. However, this newfound balance may not be as rosy as it appears. Judy Hopps
reveals to her parents that she has 275 siblings, which makes sense given her rabbit lineage's need
to overcompensate for the loss of members to predators. But with predators no longer eating
prey, and prey still reproducing at normal rates, there are two sinister possibilities at play.
One possibility is that the government has implemented brutal population control measures,
resulting in the culling of both predator and prey populations. The government may
even be feeding the culled animals back to the predator population to prevent famine.
This would explain the ongoing resentment and fear that prey still harbors for predators
and how the carnivorous species continue to survive, given their obligate carnivore diets.
Alternatively, Zootopia may be on the brink of ecological disaster as an exploding population
rapidly depletes available resources. Crops may not be produced quickly enough to keep
up with demand, leading to famine and a societal collapse where all factions turn on each other.
Either way, there are grave issues lurking beneath the surface of this seemingly harmonious world.
The theory proposed in the linked Reddit post suggests that the town of New Harmony,
which is briefly mentioned in the Zootopia movie, is a place where predators go to live in isolation
due to the stigma and discrimination they face in the rest of Zootopia.
Based on my knowledge of the Zootopia movie, there is no explicit confirmation or denial of
this theory. However, the concept of a place where predators can live away from the rest of society
due to fear and discrimination is consistent with the themes and messages of the movie.
Some commenters on the Reddit thread express support for the theory, citing evidence from
the movie to support the idea that predators may face isolation and exclusion in Zootopia.
Others raise counterarguments, suggesting that the theory oversimplifies the issue and
overlooks other factors that may contribute to the conflict between predators and prey in the movie.
Zootopia: the awful reality of the new harmony between
predator and prey. : FanTheories (reddit.com)
Finally, we’ve reached the truth. Confirmed truth. People have blown the whistle on these
theories with such compelling evidence that they mus be true. These theories are the Truthbombs.
Our final theory is: The absence of humans has resulted in there being no domestic animals.
If you observe the entire duration of the movie "Zootopia", you may notice the absence
of domestic mammals such as dogs or cats. Instead, the only canines and felines that are visible are
wild species, including wolves, foxes, lions, and leopards. This may seem peculiar at first,
but it is a deliberate creative choice made by the filmmakers.
The reason behind this choice is because the movie takes place in a universe where humans do
not exist. In this world, mammals have evolved human-like characteristics and developed their
own societies and civilizations. With the absence of humans, there was no domestication of animals,
which is the process of taming and selectively breeding certain species for specific traits.
As a result, there are no breeds of house dogs or cats in this universe. Instead,
the wild species are the only ones that exist and they have retained their natural instincts
and behaviors. This adds to the unique and imaginative world-building of "Zootopia",
which explores the dynamics of different animal species living together in a bustling metropolis.
Makes sense to us! But tell us what you think!
And on that note: Do you have any theories we missed? Make sure to
hit that notification bell and binge our other theory videos,
as well as our Zootopia: Good to Evil. But most importantly: Stay Wicked!