you know the supreme court struck down some portions of the house on
immigration law
scalia had an interesting descent in that case that he represented
of the conservatives who thought
that the whole
long should be maintained
not even half of it stricken
they thought that the arizona law did not conflict
with their federal laws at all
but i've found a couple lines in his uh...
dipping into the the most interesting
now he agrees import highway to understand that the parts available
sculley agrees with
the parts that
they don't know colby dissents
so here's what he said he said quote as a lawyer has moved to protect
it's offering t
finally there you go justin antonin scalia saving up for states rights and
saying look as on the state's kind of sovereignty and out of course you could
pass laws saying that uh... if you are
that here illegally that he could take uh... caroll actually issue within the
state of arizona and not just wait for the federal government alright here here
so it's been a state's rights guy
uh... he continued to say
if securing it's there
is securing its territory in this fashion is not one of the power of
arizona
we should cease referred to it
as a sovereign state
very strong language my god if arizona wants that
pass laws in this regard no matter what federal law as they should be able to do
that i was and i just saw birthdate
states rights
you know there's a catch coming right
today
on the same exactly on a different decision on the case of citizens united
now
this is the
the actual case is called american tradition for mister person pollock
it's um... montana
case that has to do with citizens united
montanez and we've got our are all laws in the sovereign state amount montana
will literally the last one hundred years
the referendum passed by the voters saying corporations cannot give two
politicians because we think he gives them too much power anti-corruption are
bus system
what it's going to
you turn around and said defect states our products
of course not
shut up about your state's rights
might editor of the remaining rights
no
corporations have all the rights
coverages are people my friend
they didn't even hear the case
the majority that ruled on including justice kennedy the so-called
moderate conservative
they said no
we extra it's we are in favor of citizens united
if there's any state law that we think disagrees with citizens united we strike
it down
early states rights sovereign
you ballinger head and dualism multinational corporations tell you to
do
if they want to buy your politicians
you shut up in montana
he'll let them by your politicians
i'd love this because in the original citizens united case justice kennedy
had written these two very important line squall
independent expenditures meaning the kinds of corporations and rich people
do influence politics
including those made by corporations
will not give rise to corruption
or their appearance of corruption
but the montana supreme court had said
our law is very clear in montana
the voters said it
we agree
it does lead to corruption
at states rights uh... jobs jobs jobs
no i don't care
corporations of all the time
and then the second part of what the activity of said was
no sufficient
governmental interest
justifies limits on the political speech of non-profit or for-profit
corporations
in other words
you even have any government interest in trying to get corporations to not buy
your politician
that was an original citizens united casey that there is not even experience
of impropriety that couldn't possibly
ineffective parents
but it appears that these corporations by giving bride from politicians
legal drives a year here's all of those laws are in a million dollars
that does not lead to a appears of corruption
but i think resisting anybody's ever heard in the montana supreme court said
that's that's not the case of montana
here are the voters are absolutely convinces oza legislatures rosa want has
a report
but it does at the very least lead to an appearance of corruption
here at the demand here arguments five before
the dissenting justices certainly we got any of those out
what do you know i think at least that and there is that there is approaching
and the five conservatives who said we don't give a damn about
any ideology
any state's rights
any corruption or appearance of corruption
we'll ruled by the corporations
that is why we were put here and we will do their bidding we'll do their service
so any hope that you had
that this supreme court of justice kennedy would see the light
and somehow they would overturn citizens united gaw
no such file
supreme court is hopeless in this regard
there's only one hope that remains
and that is the constitutional amendment
because
their viruses complete in washington
they're never going to do it goes corrupt politicians that are bought
while those corporate money at the end of the first place
the supreme court is bought by the corporations hussein corrupt politicians
put those same corrupts a pre-recorded as-is on the supreme court
and it never gonna change their mind and they didn't today
so the whole way did you notice that amend the constitution say
the paling toward claire dot
desert all-out assist eighty one percent a country believes
that money
invoices politicians
but it corrupts politicians apparently we were kind of one eighty one percent
of the country said that
so here's your amendment that says
corporations cannot give money they are not human beings
and anybody
even a child knows they're not human beings
may have cards and a half years they have a lot more than a letter
what kind of sectoral cassettes
they they're not human beings
you do not have the rights
the constitutional rights or the human rights
citizens of this country
and from now on one of the publicly finance all were licensed
corporate interests and these monied interests can buy our politicians
burnett wanted done
and or they come sheet
there so instead of bright
so today is absolutely clear
supreme court is not here to help you it's here to hurt you they don't work
too
four u they work for the corporations
and found them in the constitution
and tell them
nowhere in charge
you're not in charge