Charlie Kirk could
the head of turning point USA was
at a turning point USA event.
When someone in the audience
suggested engaging in violence
against their political opponents.
Now, the question itself was pretty
terrible, but Charlie Kirk's answer
wasn't much better.
Let's watch >> At this point,
we're living under a corporate and
medical fascism.
This is tyranny.
When do we get to use the guns?
No, that's not a joke.
I'm not saying like that.
I mean, literally,
where's the line?
How many elections are they
going to steal
before we kill these people?
>> So I'm going to denounce that
and tell you why.
Because you are playing into all
their plans, and they
are trying to make you do this.
That's okay, just hear me out,
you started with the complements,
[LAUGH] so now just give
me a little bit.
They are trying to provoke you, and
every one here.
They are trying to make you do
something that will be violent,
that will justify, a takeover of
your freedoms and liberties, the
likes of which we have never seen.
We are close to have.
Hold on.
We are close to have momentum to be
able to get this country back on
a trajectory using the peaceful
means that we have at us.
So to answer your question.
And I just think it's overly blunt.
We have to be the ones that do not
play into the violent aims and
ambitions of the other side.
They fear.
Let me say this very clearly.
They fear us, holding the line,
with self control, and discipline,
taking over school board meetings.
They're the ones that are willing
to use federal force against us.
>> So Charlie Kirk responds to
a problem that he took part in
creating, the constant demonizing
and constant manufactured culture
war garbage, that he engages in.
Persuades people in that audience,
the very person who asked
him the question, hey we need we're
under medical tyranny I'm assuming
he's referring to vaccine mandates.
They're stealing our elections
something that Charlie Kirk has
engaged in in spreading
that absolute lie that he's engaged
in spreading.
So when do we get to use our guns
there they're convinced by the way
they really genuinely think the
election was stolen they're living
under medical tyranny and they need
to use their guns to protect
themselves from said tyranny.
Charlie Kirk created that problem I
appreciate the fact that he tried
to calm the guy down a little bit.
By saying no, no,
we shouldn't resort to violence.
However, he prefaced all
of that with continuing to demonize
the political opponents.
>> Yeah, so look the guy asked that
question is way more at fault in
Charlie Kirk is in that situation.
But now if you'll notice that
Charlie while saying why he
shouldn't do the violence,
which is good, I'm thrilled that he
didn't sanction anyway, so
credit where credit is due on that.
Okay?
But then he said,
it's because it's a trick they're
trying to get you to do.
So it's actually the Liberals fault
it's a progressive fault.
For trying to get you to do
as the guy looks like he's
perfectly ready to do it.
We've nobody had to trick
them into doing it.
But Charlie never said, by the way,
don't do it because it's immoral.
You shouldn't kill your
political opponents.
>> That's right. >> Thats insane.
He never said it was nuts.
He said, I get it, I get it.
But It's a political trick.
Don't fall into
the political trick.
He never said what do you
a monster?
What no don't kill the the guys you
disagree with?
Are you nuts?
Now it's so but
at least he didn't say go do it.
Whereas Matt gates and Caw Thorne
and all of these elected Republican
congress people are saying, you tie
for second amendment remedies If
somebody comes to your door make
sure you grab your guns, somebody
from the government grab your guns,
second amendment, second amendment.
Gee, I wonder where they
got the idea.
And to me the most telling part was
when he first stated the idea of
murdering people on the left,
did you notice?
>> The cheering?
>> The cheering,
exactly >> Yeah >> The applause,
all right murderer, murderer,
there that's a right wing audience
of course I guarantee you if you
said it in a left wing audience,
hey is it time to say start killing
right wingers, people will be like
holy cow, get him out of here.
Why did he say that?
>> Can we also just address
the incessant talking points from
the right wing in regard to black
and brown people in this country
and how they engage in a culture of
violence.
That's the talking point that we
hear over and over again.
What do you bring up the disparity
in prisoners between black and
white prisoners, for instance.
Well, black people
are overrepresented in prisons
because a culture of violence
culture of violence.
Really, it's because of a culture
of violence?
I mean, it is fascinating, right?
Because right there out in the open
you have a right winger in a very
public event on tape suggesting
using firearms using his weapon
against his political opponents but
you don't hear anyone pointing to
the right wing.
To discuss that culture of violence
pointing to white males
in America and their engagement in
a culture of violence.
>> Are you kidding me?
>> Firstly okay to do it.
>> Firstly of all >> Totally okay.
>> First of all what Anna's saying
is indisputable and
you know that even if you're
a right winger you know it's true.
You do it all guns, all guns, kill,
kill, guns, guns.
What culture violence I don't see
it, I don't see it.
No, I see it just because the media
in this country has been so
deferential to you that
liberal media, they're our enemy.
Are you kidding me to kiss your ass
24/7.
Hey, take care,
you're good American patriots,
the real Americans, the middle of
the country Americans.
My God. Of course cultural bias is
awesome when they do it right.
So look guys, the last part of this
is the guy started talking about
corporate rule.
If you're a right winger,
you want to know how you
could actually end corporate rule.
It's not by killing people.
That's, one it's immoral.
Two, it's not going to work.
Okay, you get what you're going to
kill your way on a corporate rule
that doesn't make any sense.
In fact, that's the one thing
Charlie's right about,
what he would do and it's not about
liberals versus conservatives.
Corporate donors own the entire
Republican Party and
90% of the Democratic Party.
If you did that they would do
a shutdown, they would take away
more of everyone's rights they
would take away right wingers
rights they would take away left
wingers rights and
they would impose more corporate
tyranny on you so how do you
actually fight corporate tyranny.
Get the big money out of politics
you knuckleheads corporations give
millions of dollars to politicians.
To Nancy Pelosi and
Mitch McConnell, do you see any
other show telling you the truth?
The right way shows us like no no
the right wing Republican senators
who they take the corporate money
but it doesn't affect them at all
and then you'll see a bunch of
MSNBC shows the Democrats take
money just Pelosi took $720 million
in the last count from donors,
you think $720 million in effector.
Now we're honest about it.
The MSNBC in the New York Times
lying cover for her, no corporate
money only affects Republicans,
not Democrats.
Absurd, get the money out.
The money is bribery and
the bribery and
the corruption go join wolf pack.
Look I'm telling this to the right
wingers who are saying the most
outrageous things.
But we got to work together to get
the goddamn money out otherwise
this country's toast and we've lost
our democracy, wolf-pack.com.