TURNS
OUT THE PUBLICATIONS IN THE UK DON'T HAVE THE SAME FIRST
AMENDMENT FREE PRESS RIGHTS THAT WE HAVE HERE IN THE UNITED
STATES.
AS A RESULT, TABLOIDS ARE UNABLE TO WRITE ABOUT SOME
UNIDENTIFIED CELEBRITY COUPLE AND HOW ONE OF THEM HAS BEEN
ENGAGING IN EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS.
THAT'S NOT REALLY AN
IMPORTANT STORY, TABLOIDS IN THE US CAN FREELY REPORT ON
SOMETHING LIKE THAT AND THEY DON'T REALLY FACE ANY PENALTIES
FOR DOING IT, BUT IT TURNS ON THE UK, IT'S A DIFFERENT STORY
AND IT BRINGS TO QUESTION WHAT IS AND IS NOT CONSIDERED
NEWSWORTHY AIR IN THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST.
DAILY MAIL WAS ONE OF
THE BIGGEST I WAS IN THE UK WAS NOT TOO HAPPY ABOUT THIS SO THEY
SHARED THEIR THOUGHTS ABOUT IT ON THE FRONT PAGE OF ONE OF THE
ISSUES.
WHY THE LIES AND ASKED.
AT SUCH A BRITISH THING TO SAY.
HE SAY WITH A BRITISH ACCENT TAX
I HAVE TO GET INTO IT.
EACH ACCENT HAS A CODE WHERE THEY GET
ME STARTED THAT I DO DECLARE.
WHY IS THE LAW AND ASK.
FOR IRISH IT'S TOP OF THE MORNING TO YOU WHY THE LAWS
AND ASKED OUR
SO THAT'S REALLY THE CRUX OF WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THE UK.
THE
COURT DECIDED OR THE JUDGE DECIDED I SHOULD SAY THAT
YOU KNOW WHAT, THIS DOESN'T REALLY MAKE MUCH SENSE
BECAUSE IT IS NOT GOING TO DO ANY GOOD FOR THE PUBLIC
DIET DOESN'T REALLY SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
SO YEAH, I THINK THE PRIVACY OF THESE CELEBRITIES IS MORE
IMPORTANT THAN LETTING THIS INFORMATION OUT.
TO AMERICANS, THIS IS AN AFFRONT NOT TO OUR WAY OF
THINKING BUT THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
BUT TO OUR POP CULTURE.
ABSOLUTELY.
OUR POP CULTURE THRIVES ON THESE KINDS OF STORIES.
THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS.
YOU'RE TELLING ME WERE NOT ALLOWED TO FIND OUT ABOUT A
CELEBRITY AFFAIR?
I ACTUALLY LOVE THOSE.
HERE'S THE THING, HERE'S A
LITTLE TWIST TO THE STORY.
THE UK TABLOIDS ARE RIGHTLY ARGUING
THAT THIS INFORMATION IS ALREADY OUT THERE BECAUSE OF THE
INTERNET.
SEE YOU HAVE THE INTERNET, AND YOU HAVE
PUBLICATIONS THAT MIGHT BE BASED IN OTHER COUNTRIES WHERE THEY
HAVE DASH FOR THE PRESS HAS MORE FREEDOM.
IF THEY CAN REPORT ON IT AND IT'S ALREADY OUT THERE IN
THE PUBLIC, WHY CAN'T THE UK PAPERS REPORT ON ATTACKS
THE JUDGE IS SAYING YOU DON'T KNOW THAT MAN.
AND THE TAB LINKS ARE SAYING NO WE DO.
BECAUSE THE INTERNET THAT'S WHERE YOU HOLDING US BACK.
BY THE WAY, DID WE LOOK IT UP TAX DO YOU KNOW WHO IT IS DECKS
I DO NOT LOOK IT UP BECAUSE I BUY PEOPLE'S PRIVACY.
SEE THOSE ARE PRINCIPLES RIGHT THERE.
I WOULD'VE JUST BLURTED IT OUT AND EVERYONE IN THE UK
WOULD'VE KNOWN.
THAT'S A GOOD POINT THAT WE HAVE A HUGE AUDIENCE IN THE UK.
WE DO.
THEIR SECOND-LARGEST COUNTRY.
THEY MAKE AN EXCELLENT
POINT.
IF THEY HEARD IT, AND ALL KIDDING ASIDE, I'M GLAD
THAT YOUíRE NOT DOING IT BECAUSE IT'S NOT RELEVANT.
IT'S NOT REAL
NEWS.
PEOPLE ARE HUMANS.
THEY HAVE HUMAN FAILINGS.
JUST THE FACT THAT THEY ARE CELEBRITIES DOESN'T MEAN
THAT WE SHOULD GET INTO ALL THE NOOKS AND CURTIS OF THEIR
LIVES AND THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THE STORY.
I'M GLAD WERE NOT GIVING OUT THE NAME EITHER, BUT WE EASILY
COULD AND THEN EVERYONE IN THE UK WOULD FIND OUT.
I WANT TO ADDRESS SOMETHING BEFORE I START READING THE
COMMENTS THAT DRIVE ME TALKING INSANE ABOUT YOU DON'T VALUE
PEOPLE'S PRIVACY YOU ALWAYS TALK ABOUT REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS THAT
ARE CHILLING SITTING OTHERWISE.
THERE'S A PUBLIC SERVICE AND
LETTING YOU KNOW ABOUT THAT.
THESE ARE LAWMAKERS THAT USE
FAMILY VALUES AS THEIR PLATFORM.
THEY PUSHED FOR LEGISLATION FOR
THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY.
THEY JUDGE THE LGBT COMMUNITY THAT IF
YOU'RE GOING TO GO AROUND TALKING ABOUT THE SANCTITY OF
MARRIAGE AND HOW IMPORTANT IT IS TO YOU, THE DESERVE OR THE
VOTERS DESERVE TO KNOW IF YOU HAVE BEEN HAVING AN AFFAIR
WITH YOUR WIFE WITH SOMEONE YOU FOUND ON THE INTERNET.
HAVE WE EVER DONE NORMAL VOICES WHEN SOMEONE DISAGREES
WITH US?
AND THEN THEY SAY NO.
IT'S ALWAYS EXAGGERATED.