Speaker 1: a single completely standard generic Democrat crushed for right wingers on Fox
News related to the FBI search warrant served at Trump's Mar a Lago.
I'm talking about Jessica TARLOV.
I'm like no big Jessica TARLOV fan.
She's intelligent.
She's a completely standard Democratic Party apologist, not someone whose political views
are super exciting to me.
But I have to give her credit.
She holds her own when she goes on these Fox News programs.
She was on a program called The Five where there are I guess it's like there's four sort
of hosts and then a fifth person who they often put in the middle.
As you can see here, in this particular episode, it was right wing bomb thrower Dan Bongino,
who was brought in.
And every single person on this panel, I believe it's going from left to right here.
Dagen McDowell Then it's Jessica TARLOV, then it's Bongino.
Then I believe that that's Dana Perino, although there's like 50 different, you know, blond
news women on Fox News.
And it's a little zoom, zoom that I can't tell who that is.
And then on the far right is Greg GUTFELD.
All right wingers.
The topic is the search warrant served at Mar a Lago and they try all of them to use
these very often repeated but factually incorrect talking points about Trump complied with the
subpoena for the documents, but actually he did all these different things.
And TARLOV is taking it from all sides and fending it off quite well, I have to tell
you.
Speaker 3: President has had to comply with.
And why now?
Because they subpoenaed him in June and he did not comply.
Now, you know I'm.
Speaker 2: Not making that.
Speaker 3: Up.
No.
Speaker 1: She's not making it up.
The Trump lawyers claimed that Trump complied with the subpoena, but the FBI knew better
and they knew they hadn't gotten the documents back.
It's sort of like if you say, I am bankrupt, that doesn't mean you were bankrupt.
You can claim to be bankrupt.
I'll go even further.
The Alex Jones example you can file for bankruptcy.
That doesn't actually mean that you were bankrupt.
It just means you have.
You've made a legal assertion that you are bankrupt.
Trump's lawyer said, We gave you everything they didn't.
Okay.
So that there's there's one aspect and then it just continues.
Speaker 2: Here you are.
He actually met with them on June 3rd, according to multiple.
Yes.
Speaker 1: And they're meeting with someone.
Understand the subterfuge and the distortion.
Meeting with FBI agents doesn't mean you complied with the demand to return all the documents.
These are two different things.
And Jessica TARLOV realizes.
Speaker 2: That actually met with them on June 3rd, according to.
Speaker 3: Multiple.
Yes.
And then after that, Jane Pratt, who was the agent involved in this, who does oversee it,
was like, wait, it was six weeks since the end of June and that's okay.
Speaker 1: So then they interrupt her.
Now Dagen McDowell comes in with look at how look at how slowly they moved.
It took so long for them to act.
Speaker 3: It was six it was six weeks since the end of June.
And that was the last communication.
What's was last target, if it was so urgent?
That was a challenge.
It was there a subpoena ignored by the Trump?
They had to.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Dagen mcdowell is now using another talking point.
This is a very common talking point they're using, which is if this was so urgent, if
it was so urgent and of national security consequences that Trump had these documents,
you know, in his toy, later in his bathroom, wherever he had him at Mar a Lago.
If it was so urgent, why did they slow play it so much?
Why did they allow six weeks to go by between the the June 3rd meeting and serving the search
warrant?
This is one where they want to have it both ways.
Imagine that.
The FBI did something totally different.
Imagine that the FBI didn't give Trump the six weeks.
They just went in and went looking for the documents.
These very same right wingers would be saying this is not a way to treat a former president.
They should have done it through lawyers.
They should have given the operative, given him the opportunity to return the documents.
It's too aggressive to go in so quickly.
So do not fall for that talking point.
They're saying the FBI moved so slowly it couldn't possibly have been of security consequences
if the FBI moved quickly.
They would have said that's an inappropriate way to handle an investigation into a former
president.
And again, Jessica TARLOV just doing everything she can to refute this nonsense.
Speaker 3: Subpoena ignored by the Trump.
They had conversations after the subpoena.
Why multiple conversations with no survey have hyped, you know, whether they complied
or not.
Speaker 1: Okay.
So, again, the question is, did they comply with it?
Just because you had conversations after the date doesn't mean you did what the subpoena
instructed you to do.
And then just one other really funny moment.
Bongino couldn't help but bring up Hillary Clinton.
And I really like how Jessica TARLOV here looks at her watch and says, Wow, you made
it 9 minutes before mentioning Hillary.
Speaker 2: So on the Democrat side, Hillary Clinton literally my hand.
Three, we are in spy paid for 9 minutes to produce a hoax about this.
And you're highlighting the Democrat Party as a paragon of don't.
Speaker 3: Make me laugh.
Speaker 1: They can't help themselves that this can't just be about the facts.
It has to be about Hunter Biden's laptop or when Hillary Clinton, OxiClean emails or whatever
the case.
It can't just be about the facts and really nice job they're done by Jessica TARLOV.