What if just one lifestyle change
could help you avoid getting cancer,
or diabetes, or heart disease,
or high blood pressure?
This one change could cut your risk of chronic disease
and add years to your life.
Well, the simple solution to so many of these problems
is to eat a healthy diet.
In other words, one centered around whole plant foods.
Welcome to the Nutrition Facts Podcast,
I'm your host, Dr. Michael Greger.
Today we look a problem that many men experience from time to time,
erectile dysfunction.
And we start by looking at the nuts.
I’m talking about walnuts, almonds and hazelnuts.
Here’s the story.
In 2013 — I can't believe it's already been so long — I posted a video
based on this study, that found that three weeks of pistachios resulted
in a significant improvement in erectile function in men.
It's always nice to see a whole food intervention have clinical effects,
and I was curious to revisit the topic to see what's been published since.
Even if you ignore all the lab animal studies on, you know,
how much hazelnuts improve the function of rat testicles,
you still never know what you'll find searching the medical literature
for nuts and sexual function,
like this case of penile strangulation with a metal hex nut.
I guess nuts can sometimes make things worse if you can't remove them.
They used the Dundee technique, which involves creating 20 puncture holes
to relieve the pressure, but that didn't work.
So a diamond disk cutter was used to saw through it,
and they slipped a few times. All's well that ends well.
Well, that got me curious.
Evidently, penile entrapment is so common,
there's an entire grading system that emergency room docs can use.
If a drill is not available, these surgeons advise
a hammer and chisel may be used. A drill? Oh, a dental drill.
I like how they brag about the precisely cut edges.
Looks pretty jagged to me.
To "preserve the penis from a fatal outcome"
(that's a strange way to put it),
urologists should be aware of all the available armamentarium,
and if you don't know how to operate the saw,
you can always call in your local blacksmith.
Yet, how are you going to remove a barbell or steel sledgehammer head?
A heavy-duty air grinder provided by the fire department, requiring 6 hours
of cutting, with the patient protected from the sparks with fire coats
whatever it takes. Hack saw. Cement eater.
Or the silk winding method.
But anyway, back to the task at hand.
Consumption of at least one serving of vegetables a day and more than
two servings of nuts a week was associated with more than
a 50% decrease in the probability of erectile dysfunction
in a snapshot-in-time cross-sectional study.
But such observational studies can't prove cause-and-effect.
It's like finding that men who eat more healthfully have better swimmers.
Maybe men who eat nuts are just health nuts,
and the improvement is due to some other factor like exercise.
What we need is an interventional trial, and here we go.
The effect of nut consumption on semen quality and functionality:
a randomized controlled trial.
A Standard American Diet, with or without a handful of walnuts,
and a half handful of each almonds and hazelnuts.
And the nut group experienced significant improvements
in their total sperm count, vitality, motility, and shape,
perhaps because those in the nut group
showed a significant reduction in SDF: sperm DNA fragmentation.
The nuts appeared to protect their sperm DNA.
Too bad while they were at it, they didn't measure the guys'
erectile and sexual dysfunction. Oh, but they did!
The effect of nut consumption on erectile and sexual function from the same study.
The researchers report that those in the nut group saw a significant increase
in orgasmic function and sexual desire, but what about erectile function?
Any time you see this kind of selective glass-half-full reporting
you suspect some kind of industry funding,
and indeed that was the case here.
Yes, there was a marginal increase in orgasmic function and sexual desire
of questionable clinical significance, but no improvement in erectile function,
intercourse satisfaction, or overall satisfaction.
And with so many comparisons, even the so-called significant findings
may not even be statistically significant.
But why did the pistachios I talked about back in 2013 work,
while these other nuts didn't?
Well, if you remember, the original study was done on men
in their 40s and 50s who already had chronic erectile dysfunction,
whereas the average age in the new study was 24 years old.
So they may have started out with near-maximum circulation,
not leaving much room for the nuts.
In our next story, we look at how men eating pistachio nuts
experienced a significant improvement in blood flow
through the penis accompanied by significantly firmer erections.
Here’s the story.
Erectile dysfunction is considered an important cause
of decreased quality of life in men,
in fact, so much so that one early theory suggested
that this may explain the link
between impotence and heart attacks.
Depression is a risk factor for coronary heart disease,
and the thought was that men who couldn't get it up
become so depressed that they like "die" of a broken heart.
But now we know that erectile dysfunction and heart disease
can be two different manifestations
of the exact same root problem,
DISEASED ARTERIES—
inflamed, oxidized, cholesterol-clogged blood vessels.
So, no wonder a diet chock full of anti-inflammatory,
antioxidant, cholesterol- lowering plant foods
would improve sexual functioning
in both men and women
as well as reduce risk of heart disease.
But why go LOW risk when you can shoot for NO risk?
A totally plant-based diet
can even stop and reverse our number one killer.
Of all the plant foods individually examined so far,
nuts are among those most tied to longevity.
Just two handfuls a week may extend a woman's life
as much as jogging 4 hours a week.
So, if nuts reduce the risk of heart disease,
might they also help with sexual function?
Well, men eating 3 to 4 handfuls of pistachios a day
for just 3 weeks experienced a significant improvement
in blood flow through the penis
accompanied by significantly firmer erections.
This may not be surprising.
Remember how antioxidant-rich foods
have a Viagra-like effect
of boosting nitric oxide production?
Well, pistachios are certainly rich sources of antioxidants.
And remember how the citruline in watermelons
helped with erection firmness
by boosting arginine,
which is what our body makes nitric oxide out of?
Well, pistachios have a bunch of arginine,
which may help explain the improvement in blood flow.
And we know that cholesterol is an important predictor
of sexual dysfunction in both men and women,
and after just 3 weeks on all those pistachios
there were significant improvements in cholesterol.
And like other studies that piled on
hundreds of calories of nuts a day there was no weight gain.
Conclusion: just 3 weeks of pistachios
resulted in a significant improvement in erectile function
with additional improvement in cholesterol
without any side effects.
Note the 2 important differences
between diet and drugs.
Just taking drugs like Viagra to poison this enzyme
and artificially boost nitric oxide signaling
is just covering up the symptoms
of the underlying problem: UNHEALTHY ARTERIES.
Whereas eating whole healthy plant foods like nuts
actually helps attack the root cause—
cholesterol, oxidation, and inflammation—
and only has good side effects.
This enzyme that Viagra-like drugs muck with
is primarily found in 2 places in the body:
the erectile tissue of the penis
and the retina of the eye.
That's why the FDA encourages people
to stop taking drugs like viagra,
and call a doctor right away
if you experience sudden loss of vision,
if of course you can still find your phone.
Though the harms tend to be self-limited and reversible,
such as cyanopsia in which your vision
suddenly becomes tinted blue.
Why risk side-effects at all,
when the problem can be reversed, cured in the first place,
improving the quality and quantity of our lives?
"Improvement of sexual function in men (and women)"
"should be added to the growing list of clinical benefits"
"brought about by healthy lifestyles in human beings."
Did you know that dioxins, endocrine disrupting pollutants,
heavy metals, saturated fat, and steroids in the meat supply
may be affecting sperm counts, semen quality,
and the ability of men to conceive?
Infertility affects 10--15% of couples attempting to conceive
and in about half the cases the problem is found in the man.
A recent Harvard study found that increasing saturated fat intake just 5%
was associated with a 38% lower sperm count. But why?
I've talked about the role of xenoestrogens, endocrine disrupting industrial pollutants
that build up in animal fat, particularly fish,
but male fertility is not just about sperm countâ€”the number of sperm,
but about how well the sperms themselves work.
A recent study found that "successful pregnancy and fertilized egg implantation outcomes"
"are decreased in patients reporting a more frequent intake of meat."
"This finding is consistent with poor semen quality
associated with a higher intake of products"
that may incorporate these chemicals and steroids.
"The use of these compounds in the food industry
results in an increased total level of xenoestrogens"
"and sex steroids in processed foods, such as meat or milk,
whose intake contributes significantly to daily exposures".
"Xenoestrogens are highly lipophilic substances
that can accumulate in fat-rich foods, such as meat,"
"and may be suspected as partially responsible for the decline in semen quality."
"Conclusion: Couples having trouble conceiving must be advised"
"about the drastic effect of both the male and female lifestyle on treatment success."
This is consistent with previous findings that frequent intake
of fat-laden foods like, meat products and milk
"may negatively affect semen quality in humans,"
"whereas some fruits or vegetables may maintain or improve semen quality."
Vegetable consumption was also found protective in the new study,
which may be because of the antioxidant and nutrient content of these plant foods.
The adverse effects of meat could be from other pollutants as well.
Exposure even as an infant to low levels of dioxin
can permanently reduce sperm quality.
The general consensus is that human sperm quality has declined over time in different areas.
We're still not sure why, but dioxins may be playing a causal role.
The reason why maternal beef consumption may alter a man's testicular development
and adversely affect his future reproductive capacity
is thought to be due to the anabolic steroids implanted into the animals,
but as the accompanying editorial points out,
the steroids could also be interacting with other xenobiotic,
meaning industrial chemicals present in meat, such as pesticides and dioxin-like pollutants,
and even chemicals that may be present in the plastic wrap.
Heavy metals may also play a role.
Lead and cadmium exposure as measured in the bloodstream
was associated with significantly longer time to conceive.
Where might exposure be coming from?
Common types of seafood right out of fish markets and supermarkets were sampled.
The highest cadmium levels were found in tuna;
highest lead levels were found in scallops and shrimp.
The greatest risk from different metals resided in different fish; some of which got really high.
"Thus, the risk information given to the public (mainly about mercury)
does not present a complete picture."
There are other toxic metals in fish as well.
The largest and oldest fish had some of the highest levels,
and we see that with other animals as well,
for example, contamination of beef by cadmium and lead,
clearly dependent on the age of the animal.
The only beverage associated with infertility in women was soft drinks,
though this may be from an indirect route, with soda linked to obesity
and then obesity then linked to reduced fertilization rates,
though there has been a study on one really direct route,
the effectiveness of Coca Cola as a spermicidal agent in vaginal douching.
Diet coke apparently had the strongest effect.
Harvard researchers publishing in the New England Journal of Medicine.
What about Coke versus Pepsi?
Tax-payer money hard at work for this head to head test.
And neither of them really worked - Coke nor Pepsi,
though they explain their methods for preparing the sperm-Cola mixtures
differed from the Harvard group.
Bottomline: soda probably isn't good for you going into any orifice.
We would love it if you could share with us your stories
about reinventing your health through evidence-based nutrition.
Go to nutritionfacts.org/testimonials.
We may share it on our social media to help inspire others.
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, or studies mentioned here,
please go to the Nutrition Facts Podcast landing page.
There you’ll find all the detailed information you need –
plus, links to all of the sources we cite to each of these topics.
My latest two books are “How to Survive a Pandemic”,
available on e-book, audiobook, or actual book.
And the “How Not to Diet Cookbook”, with more than 100 recipes for
delicious and nutritious meals.
All the proceeds I receive from the sales of my books go to charity.
NutritionFacts.org is a nonprofit, science-based public service,
where you can sign up for free daily updates
on the latest in nutrition research via bite-sized videos and articles.
Everything on the website is free.
There’s no ads, no corporate sponsorship.
It’s strictly non-commercial. I’m not selling anything.
I just put it up as a public service, as a labor of love,
as a tribute to my grandmother,
whose own life was saved with evidence-based nutrition.