Hey internet friends. With China being one of the ancient civilizations along with Babylon,
Maya, and Egypt, its history is riddled with the rise and fall of competing powers, strict
adherence to the ways of old, marked by revolution and revolt to bring in the new, and recently,
a century of shame and humiliation—but crafted from the rubble of a broken society, a new
future manifested: a future that experts have claimed belongs to the Chinese. As the red
sun rises in the east, a shadow looms over the west, accentuated by the western media
with reports of tensions mounting between global superpowers. While mainstream media
has villainized the Chinese threat to the global hegemony, many a alternative media
source has praised the Chinese for fighting what they call "the New World Order". But
is China fighting this New World Order? Are they forging their own world order? Or is
China just another actor on the global stage? Well, hopefully you'll be able to tell me
after we examine what the media won't tell us about China. In order to understand what's
going on with China right now, we must connect the past to the present with historical context.
To vastly over simplify and summarize several millennia of Chinese history, imperial China
was once subject to the dynastic cycle: one dynasty fell and was replaced by another,
time after time—with a society and culture shaped by Confucianism, under which moral
behavior was celebrated. The philosophy of Confucius served as the basis for creating
a functioning society: upright moral behavior exhibited both by the government and the average
citizen provided a sense of order that was enhanced by a person knowing his or her own
place in a series of hierarchical relationships and acting accordingly, between government
and society and even between individual family members—particularly between father and
son. Confucianism placed emphasis on mutual respect, and if this principle was effectively
implemented within the home or even between the emperor and his country, then society
would be successful. And for a time, China was successful as a
leading civilization and dominant global economic superpower…well, until British imperialism
rocked China. Which brings us to the 19th century, a century that brought about political
and social change globally. Western merchants set their sights on China, and what made China
such a desirable trade partner was its trade range, innovation, production capabilities,
and large commercial ships. However, China wasn't too keen on the Western sphere of influence,
and they were wary of these foreign merchants; thus they limited trade to certain ports,
and traders weren't allowed to step foot in the empire unless in the designated area.
All these rules fueled resentment in the barren hearts of those who saw great potential for
profit doing trade deals with China, more specifically, it fueled resentment within
a certain empire who desperately needed those trade deals to remedy the financial burden
of starting all these pesky wars! So Great Britain got a little creative—that's putting
it kindly. They started what we now know as the "Opium Wars" with China, during which
the British grew poppies in India, turned those poppies into opium, and sold that opium
to the Chinese to both profit and get the Chinese addicted to opium so they would buy
more. Opium was illegal in China during that time, but that didn't stop shady merchants
from selling those drugs on the black market. China responded by attempting to completely
remove the opium from their country by burning it, but that didn't really work so eventually
war broke out, and it didn't end so well for the Chinese. A government promoting illegal
trade and flooding a society with addictive drugs all to profit and subvert a threat to
the empire? By golly, who's ever heard of such a thing? If we examine history as a whole,
we'd notice several patterns emerge, one of which being: ￼the strong targeting perceived
weakness, especially if that weakness possesses something the strong desires, doesn't matter
if we're talking Rome, Japan, or Great Britain as blanket statement imperialists. To rule
the world, or at least attempt to, aggressive strength must be exerted, and in the great
jungle of greed, bloodlust, and intoxicating power trips: there are predators and there
are prey. China's century of shame and humiliation began with the opium wars, but things were
about to get a whole lot worse before they got better. The Aftermath of the opium wars
resulted in more trade ports opening for foreigners and merchants gaining rights to travel within
China, which is how the infamous Rothschild banking family secured their spot there, along
with the notorious Rockefeller family with their Standard Oil business, both families
now heralded as "philanthropists". A fragmented and war-torn country meant the spoils were
up for grabs. During the Boxer Rebellion at the turn of the century, China attempted once
more to get the foreign invaders out of their country. The once-united China dissolved into
regions that became states ruled by warlords. And the tried and true divide-and-conquer
tactics of the enemy became the kiss of death for the ancient imperial dynasty, and gave
way to what we now know as the modern communist state. Following the Boxer Rebellion, the
former economic powerhouse went into a period of decline, with a suffering peasant class
and no clear leadership, creating the perfect opportunity for a new order to emerge. At
odds with each other were the nationalist and communist parties of China—the communist
side funded largely by the same folks who funded the Bolshevik revolution, all sides
of the world wars, and even the wars taking place today. But while the entire world was
at war during the 20th century, China was struggling internally: not only was China
battling it out with invading Japanese imperialists, but the Nationalist and Communist parties
were feuding amongst themselves, too, not trusting each other while fighting their common
enemy. A changing of the guard occurred during the 6000 mile trek of Chinese Communists that
secured them as the governing system and Mao as their leader. This was known as the Long
March, which harnessed the frustration and enthusiasm of young Chinese to accomplish
their goals and push their agenda, which was driving imperialism out of China. The people's
republic of China has been ruled by the Communist party since 1949…And by definition, "Communism"
is a socioeconomic structure and political ideology that promotes the establishment of
an egalitarian, classless, and stateless society based on common ownership" and essentially,
there's no private property under communism. One of the first things Mao did was take the
farms of the wealthy farmers and redistributed it for communal farming in what was known
as "The Great Leap Forward", but unfortunately, it was a great leap forward into famine, as
many millions of Chinese peasants starved to death as a result. Despite all of that,
Mao is still praised by the Chinese government for reunifying China, modernizing the country,
and lifting millions out of poverty, though millions suffered and died. What rarely ever
gets mentioned is who Mao really was or with whom he was connected. Hold onto your butts—things
are about to get interesting. Remember how I was talking about the opium wars? A company
by the name of Russell & Co. was the largest American trading house in China before, during,
and after the opium wars. The founder was a man by the name of Samuel Russell, cousin
of William Russell, an infamous founder of Skull and Bones at Yale University, a secret
society and fraternity whose skeletal hand has extended to every corner of the world
to recruit global leaders. In 1903, Yale established a number of schools and hospitals throughout
China, and guess who was a student there? Commie Mao. Coincidence? Let's see if we can
establish a pattern of Bonesmen in connection with communist China. George HW Bush, who
comes from a banking family who funded the rise of the Nazi party in Germany by the way,
followed the family tradition and was a Bonesman at Yale. He was also the first US diplomat
to the People's Republic of China in 1973, Yale in China was managed by Bonesman Reuben
Holden, husband of Bush's cousin. When Bush returned home, he was appointed as head of
the CIA, later becoming President of the United States, securing his own Bush Dynasty. If
you think about it, wherever Bonesmen go, wherever they target, death follows. The Gulf
War, the war on terrorism, the war in Afghanistan…just to name a few bonesmen endeavors. The CIA
has been in China for quite some time, and over the course of decades, has repeatedly
stated that China's growing economy is a threat to the United States. After his death, a struggle
for power occurred, but ultimately a leader who was friendly with the west was installed,
and established diplomatic relations with the United States in 1978. While Mao ensured
China's sovereignty by enforcing an autocratic socialist system, those who ruled after him
focused on market oriented economic development. China's "open-door policy" opened the country
to foreign investors which allowed a sprinkle of capitalism to dust over the communist country.
Despite some privatization of economic factions, the governing body was still communist, and
in 1979 China imposed its one child policy on the basis of population control.In the
summer of 1989, the west got a full view of communism at work. During the Tiananmen Square
"Massacre" of 1989, the global rift between the east and the west was reignited, and as
a very public changing of the guard occurred. China's general secretary was forced to resign
in 1987 and demonstrators gathered in Tiananmen square for weeks. Western journalists were
also conveniently present, and they documented this alleged massacre with a series of photographs
and witness accounts, stating that party leaders sent their troops to open fire on unarmed
protestors, After all, the Western media reported these unarmed protestors were promoting democracy
and were massacred bc of it, though the official death toll was never released. Sound like
a recent series of protests? A certain "spring" in Arabia? Maybe?The Chinese government had
a very different recollection of events: citing armed protestors who were voicing frustration
over the economy, not begging for democracy, and they were attacking the military presence
in the surrounding area, and stated that the majority of casualties were soldiers, not
civilians. Years later, CBS News Correspondent Richard Roth, who was on the scene at Tiananmen
Square in 1989, later went on to say: "we saw no bodies, injured people, ambulances
or medical personnel — in short, nothing to even suggest, let alone prove, that a 'massacre'
had recently occurred in that place." So what actually happened during this attempt at political
revolution at Tiananmen Square? Did a massacre occur? Or did students led by CIA-trained
agent provocateurs protest for weeks, their frustration eventually turning violent, and
the military responded, and then everyone went home? Regardless of what actually happened
there, the effects were the same, the violence portrayed and relayed on the global stage
drew international outcry. Some of the top Communist party leaders were forced to step
down. Freedom of press and freedom of speech was even more suppressed than before, and
foreign journalists were expelled and restricted from China. Within a year, the Soviet Union
fell, and the world waited for China's communist regime to fall, too…only it didn't. Between
Tiananmen Square and now, China became the second largest economy in the world, being
the world's largest manufacturer and exporter of goods. According to one study, "Imports
from China by Walmart, the nation’s largest retailer and biggest importer, eliminated
or displaced over 400,000 jobs in the United States between 2001 and 2013". As of 2018,
China owns over trillion dollars of US debt, though the federal reserve owns double that,
making the federal reserve the largest creditor in the world, though recently, there's been
a trend of China unloading its bonds—maybe they decided that US debt was a bad investment.The
alternative media has praised China for standing up to the global world order by asserting
itself on trade deals and establishing itself as a global force in investments, while simultaneously
shielding their population from outside influence, like banning Justin Bieber from China, censoring
weaponized pornography, and establishing reeducation camps for Muslim extremists. But the mainstream
media paints a very dystopian portrait of China, one of rampant internet censorship,
worrisome social credit scores like that of the Black Mirror show, along with an alarming
amount of cameras and artificial intelligence for its surveillance state, tough crackdowns
on public dissidence against the authoritarian gov, a massive DNA biobank with data on any
and every Chinese citizen perceived as a threat, a general lack of regard for human life, and
a growing sense of hostility between China and the West, as suggested by recent events
like trade wars, tariffs, rampant espionage, as well as sonic attacks on US diplomats that
mirror the attacks that occurred in Cuba last year. As I'm always saying on this channel,
while it's interesting to analyze news coverage across mainstream and alternative media, I'm
more interested in the information that's being suppressed rather than propagated. Recently,
China announced its petro-yuan to rival the petro-dollar: while the petrodollar is the
standard currency for oil-related business globally, the actual US-Federal Reserve dollar
is a tangible representation of all the debt the US has incurred as a country, backed by
our confidence to exchange it for goods and services. However, China's petro-yuan is backed
in gold. China has established trading relationships with its allies like Russia and the supplier
of endless oil, Iran—which I'm sure British Petroleum is pretty salty about, as they were
in Iran for some time but got the boot—and the implications of this petro-yuan could
have detrimental effects on the US economy. The multifaceted-threat of a gold-backed petro-yuan
was made even more complicated with the proposed European pipeline, one proposed pipeline being
Us-backed and the other Russia-backed, both of the pipelines running straight through
war-torn Syria, where foreign infiltrators are currently battling it out, one side rooting
for regime change. Could an oil-war be one of the motives for destabilizing Syria, with
the continued war on terrorism serving as the never-ending excuse? If we look to the
past, Saddam Hussein proposed selling Iraqi oil in euros instead of the petrodollar in
2000, and years later Iraq was invaded on the false pretense of weapons of mass destruction.
Gaddafi proposed selling Libyan oil in gold-backed dinars, and encouraged others to do the same,
and of course, he was overthrown and murdered in the street shortly thereafter.So, looking
to the future, how will China fare in their gold-driven monetary revolution? Will they
entice other countries to join in their parade away from the dollar? Or will they suffer
the same fate as those who attempted before them? What do you think, internet friends?
Is China fighting the New World order by taking a swing at the Federal Reserve? Is China forging
their own world order, separate from the pack? Or is China a testing ground for the Brave
New World of 1984, with an infinite amount of distractions and surveillance cameras?Let
me know! You know I always look forward to your comments. Thank you so much for watching,
subscribing, and supporting my channel on Patreon! Bye.