- [Instructor] In this video we're gonna talk about
different ways of structuring an economy.
In particular, who owns what
and how does an economy decide what to produce
and who gets the output of that production.
So on one side, you have what's known as a command economy
and good examples of command economies
are the communist states,
especially during the 20th century,
The USSR, the Soviet Union being the best example of that.
In a command economy, the government controls
what's often known as the factors of production
and sometimes, in an extreme case,
there might not even be private ownership.
So lets say that this right over here is the government.
I'll do this with some type
of a building with pillars in it.
So this is the government.
And in a command economy,
the government will often own the factories and the farms,
so the factors of production.
So let me draw a little factory here.
So with a little smoke stack...
And so the government will tell this factory,
"This year, you have to produce exactly 10,000 cars,"
"No more and no less."
and so that factory say,
"Okay, you're our boss, you're the government."
"We will produce exactly 10,000 cars."
Similarly, the government might tell some,
let's say that this right over here is a farm,
and this is my best drawing of a field really fast,
and so it needs to say "Hey, you need to produce",
I don't know, "10,000,000 apples,"
I don't even know
if that's a reasonable amount of apples to produce
but you need to produce 10,000,000 apples.
And so the farmers who essentially work for the government,
'cause the government would own that farm,
they would produce those apples.
And also in a command economy, there's like
well who gets these cars and who gets these apples?
Well, in an extreme command economy,
they will be directly allocated by the government.
The government will say,
"Alright, you get a car, you get a car, you get a car."
and it might not be based,
and in fact it will not likely be based
on any type who's willing to pay for the car
or who could pay the most for the car.
Similarly, for the apples.
So they are all gonna be allocated.
So there will have to be a lot of planning done
on the part of the government to say,
"Okay, how much should we produce of one thing"
"versus another thing and how do we decide"
"who gets the different things?".
Now the other side of the spectrum,
you have what's known as a market economy.
And most economies in the world,
especially the United States, are much closer
to being a market economy than being a command economy.
Rather than having the government owning
the factors of production, deciding who produces what
and how much and who gets those things,
in a market economy, it's all based on the factory
right over here, independent of the government
for the most part unless you're in certain fields
that might have strong influence from the government,
let's say you're a military contractor.
But if you're not in one of those fields,
if you're fairly independent of the government,
what they would say is,
"Well, what does the market need?"
they might say, "Hey look, the market needs 5,000 cars"
"That look like this but then it also needs"
"another 2,000 trucks that look like that."
and how are they basing it?
Well, they might have looked in the past
or how well is this car selling,
how well is the truck selling.
They might look at competitors,
in fact in a market economy,
you'll often have more competition.
The command economies,
you might have one really ginormous factory
that's owned by the government or a few
while here you might have competing factories
where they're always
"Hey make a pretty good car, we're gonna make one"
"that's just as good and it comes in yellow."
So once again, you have this notion of competition
for people to produce things out in the market
and they're also making their best judgment
of what does the market actually need.
Similarly, you could have your farmers here and you say,
"Hey, you know what?"
"I've been growing a lot of apples"
"but that doesn't seem to be in demand anymore"
"so I'm going to grow more, I don't know, peaches"
"'cause it looks like the sale of peaches"
"are in fashion this year."
and similarly, who gets these
is not dictated by the government,
it's determined by the market.
And so let's say this is me, let's say this is you,
let's say this is someone else.
If I might not be interested in getting a truck
but I really need to get a new car for my family
so I can drive them around and take vacations and things,
and so let's say you wanna get a car too
but the market will dictate who gets it.
So for example, the factory might set a price for this car,
they might say it is 10,000 dollars per car
and maybe I'm willing to pay it, maybe I'm not.
Maybe I'm just like "Well I really like that blue car"
"but I'm not willing to pay 10,000 dollars"
"and this yellow car is available for 9,000 dollars"
"so I'm going to get that."
and the prices themselves won't necessarily be fixed.
If they're not selling enough of these cars
at 10,000 dollars, they might lower the price
to compete with the yellow car at 9,000 dollars.
Similarly, if there's a ton of people
who are willing to pay the price of this truck,
they might raise the price on the truck
or produce more of it.
In this severe competition,
if one firm doesn't do this well on a regular basis,
they might go out of business.
So there's a strong motivation
to be able to meet the needs of the market
and then the prices adjust accordingly.
And so you might say,
"well what are the positives and negatives"
"that people generally associate"
"with command economies or market economies?".
Well, the motivation that's often given
for a command economy is some notion of fairness
or some notion of equality
that when you have a market economy,
as a byproduct of this mechanism
where different people are competing,
some people are innovating more or less,
some people might be working harder or less,
some people might just get luckier or unluckier,
you naturally will have some level of inequality.
And some of the original ideas behind command economies
like communism where hey we don't like this inequality,
we wanna see more fairness.
And so we wanna see everyone get exactly the same car.
We wanna see everyone get exactly the same number of apples.
We don't wanna see all of these competing firms,
we want one really big, efficient factory
to just churn out these cars.
Now it turns out in reality,
that's a little bit utopian.
Even at the peak of some of these communist economies,
there were people who had better access to certain things.
People who might have carried favor with the leadership,
had more power, who had better apartments, better cars,
had more access to resources and people who didn't.
In a market economy,
yes, there will be some inequality,
but the best thing going for it,
and the reason why most economies in the world,
even ones that are nominally communist
like the Chinese economy,
have transitioned to a market economy
because a market economy is also associated
with things like innovation
and strong incentives for people
to innovate or work or do things.
Think about the situation in a command economy.
Let's say that you're a manager at this factory here.
The government told you to produce exactly 10,000 cars
and exactly the type of model,
maybe you have an idea
for how to make this car more efficient,
but no one is really gonna reward you for that.
If you're not gonna be able to get paid more
so that you can buy more things,
you might not be as interested in doing it.
While in this situation,
you have extreme competition
where as soon as this factory or this company
is outselling this one,
everyone here is gonna think "Wow, we need to innovate."
"We need to really work harder"
"so that we can take more market share"
"from the other company."
Similarly, at the individual level,
different people might say
"Hey, I can only afford the yellow car now"
"but gee, I really wish I had the blue car"
"so maybe I'm gonna work a little bit harder"
"or I'm gonna try to innovate"
"or I'm gonna try to start a business."
most of the world has transitioned to something
much closer to a market economy because overall,
even though you have this inequality,
it has made more productivity, more innovation,
more goods and services available to more people.
Now the reality is most economies, as I mentioned,
they're close to a market economy,
but aren't a perfect market economy.
You still have the government very involved
in certain industries.
In many economies,
the government might be in control of healthcare.
The government in almost every country
has significant influence in things like the military.
The government, in say the United States
which is considered a fairly capitalist,
a fairly strong market economy,
the government still does offer social safety nets
when the inequality gets too extreme.
If someone isn't able to feed themselves,
they might get food stamps.
If someone isn't able to get healthcare because of poverty,
they might get Medicaid.
And so there's actually a spectrum
between a command economy and a market economy.
With most economies actually falling in this
inbetween state which is sometimes referred to
as a mixed economy.
For example, as I already mentioned,
the United States which is considered
a very capitalist country with a market economy,
it still does have some public ownership.
The government still does control certain aspects
of the economy, it still represents
a fairly large chunk of the economy.
And so a pure command economy government
would control everything,
pure market economy, you would have very little
that's controlled by the government,
but the reality in most of the world,
things fall in this mixed economy spectrum.