Welcome to Sage Audio. Today we’re covering the Top 10 Free Alternatives to
Popular Plugins. But first, If you have a mix that you need mastered,
send it to us to receive a free mastered sample of it with the link in the description.
OTT vs. MV2
If you’re looking to compress your signal from the noise floor up, there aren’t many upward
compressors, even when it comes to paid plugins - but both OTT by Xfer records and MV2 by Waves
are good options. OTT offers 3 bands of upward compression, whereas MV2 offers 1 full-range band.
They use slightly different methods of upward compression,
resulting in slightly different sounds, so let’s take a listen to both.
Fresh Air vs. Maag EQ4
The Maag EQ is known for its airband, with which you can amplify the highest frequencies
in your mix. However, this is pretty easy to accomplish with just about any parametric EQ,
or in this case Fresh Air by Slate digital which offers 2 air bands.
Although the Maag EQ also offers lower frequency bands,
if you’re looking to add air, Fresh Air is a better option.
Let’s take a listen to both and notice how fresh air can more easily
create a bright and airy sound.
If you’re enjoying the video, hit the like button; it helps us bring you more videos
LoudMax vs L1
Loudmax by Thomas Mundt and L1 by Waves are 2 very similar plugins - they both introduce automatic
makeup gain when lowering the threshold, and a clipper to attenuate peaks before they exceed 0dB.
The primary difference is that L1 has a variable release and program-dependent option.
Loudmax seems to have a fixed release time and the option for true peak detection.
Let’s listen to both using identical thresholds.
Supermassive vs. FF Pro-R
Although Supermassive is capable of really outlandish sounds, whereas the FF Pro-R
has a more realistic sound, there’s still a lot of overlap. If we go to the presets of Supermassive,
we’ll find options that are much closer to the sound of the Pro-R.
Granted, the FF Pro-R has the option to equalize the reflections with 5 bands,
whereas Supermassive only has 2, it’s still impressive how much you can do with it.
Let’s take a listen to both, using similar-sounding presets.
Only a small percentage of people that watch our videos are subscribed, so if
you’re enjoying the video consider subscribing. It’s free and you can always change your mind.
TDR NOVA vs. FF Pro-Q3
TDR NOVA offers 4 bands of dynamic EQ, with static high and low pass filters as
well - the Pro Q-3 offers up to 26 dynamic bands but this is probably overkill in most
situations. Both let you expand or compress, and alter the Q and threshold of each band.
The NOVA offers the added benefit of controlling the band’s attack
and release, but whereas both let you trigger your bands with an external side chain,
the Pro-Q 3 lets you do this on a band-by-band basis.
Let’s listen to both with identical bands, and notice how they behave very similarly.
GSatPlus vs. PSP Vintage Warmer
For this comparison, the Vintage Warmer is going to offer much greater control,
but GSatPlus should let you achieve something similar. PSP introduces
more saturation by increasing the input, whereas GSatPlus
lets you simply increase the harmonic content and control the sound with the character function.
Both let you affect the left, right,
or stereo signal, but the GSatPlus also offers mid and side processing. Lastly,
PSP puts an extra emphasis on the compression aspect of saturation, letting you affect the
release time, knee, introduce a limiter, and shape the saturation with multi-band controls.
Let’s take a listen to both and keep in mind where they do and don’t overlap.
ChowTape vs. Satin
Both of these plugins address very minute details about tape while still letting you focus on the
overall or macro aspects of tape emulation. Satin puts emphasis on realism by letting you
emulate circuits types, encoders and decoders, and input tolerance by altering the tape type.
Chow Tape Model presents more modern processing that relates to tape’s sound like basic filters,
saturation, compression, and EQ. Both offer a lot of control over
tape’s imperfections like degradation, noise, and wow and flutter modulation.
Let’s listen to both at the same tape speed,
and with relatively flat EQ responses to hear how they affect the signal differently.
If you're enjoying the channel, join the community with the link in the description.
MJUC jr. vs. Comp Tube STA
For variable tube compression, both Klanghelm and Arturia offer some good
options - Klanghelm’s MJUC Jr. is definitely simpler with an input, makeup gain output,
and 3-time constants, whereas Arturia’s gives you variable release times, 3 detection modes,
a wet/dry, and an advanced section.
Both create enjoyable tube-like compression, so if you don’t need lots of control,
MJUC jr. is a great substitute - let’s listen to both with identical amounts of compression.
LALA vs CLA 2a
This is a pretty 1:1 comparison in that everything you can get with the Waves emulation of the LA2A,
is offered by Analog Obsession’s free LALA plugin. Both offer the same input dial and
peak reduction functions, compression or limiting settings, but LALA offers
additional EQ filters and an ext, side-chain option.
Granted, the CLA-2A lets you introduce low-frequency noise,
but odds are you don’t really want to use this function.
So let’s listen to both using identical amounts of compression.
MEqualizer vs FF-Pro Q3
If you’re looking to mimic the Pro-Q 3, maybe not in regards to its dynamic functions but
solely in the parametric EQ sense, then the MEqualizer is a good free option.
The MEqualizer offers many of the same filters as the Pro-Q 3, with comprehensive slope options.
Although some of the advanced analyzer features of the Pro Q 3 are missing, MEqualizer gives you
plenty of options to choose from in the setting section. Let’s take a listen to both using analog
emulated curves, and identical shaping to see if we can hear any difference between the 2.
If you have a mix that you need mastered, send it to us to receive a free mastered sample of it
with the link in the description. Thank you so much for watching.