Well this one's been a long time coming
No, It's not the voice-acting episode that one's
tangled up in the process of getting real voice actors on board, which I think we might actually have pulled off, but no.
Today we're gonna talk about female characters in games.
The reason this particular
topic has been so long in coming is that we've been waiting for the industry to provide us with a good topical example of a
well done female character
But unfortunately nothing really helpful has come out and the triple-A release lineup has been pretty barren for the last few months anyway,
so screw it. Let's just do this thing. Alright, so women in games.
Now we could spend this whole episode ranting about top-heavy genetic anomalies or just going off on Other M for six and a half minutes,
but rather than spending all of our time whining about what makes for a bad female character
let's try to be a little more constructive and see if we can pinpoint what makes for a good one.
We've talked a little about what makes a good character before and we'd probably need a full episode or two to completely flesh out the
subject, but for today let's stick with female characters specifically.
This distinction's a little tricky because for the majority of great characters, their gender doesn't really matter.
Gender doesn't really inform who they are. It's not what defines the character or makes them interesting.
I mean, if Sonic were female instead of male,
and I'd really rather not get into that again, would it really have added anything to or taken anything away from the character?
Would making Gordon Freeman female really change anything about him? Not really.
But there are still some facets of character that are specific to gender and those facets are very rarely explored in gaming.
So what's the difference between creating a good character and
creating a good female character? To answer that we have to tackle the somewhat controversial topic- How are men and women different?
I suspect a few of your snickering at this point, so I'll give you a moment.
We good? All right.
When discussing the differences between men and women for the purposes of character creation, one thing the game development community is always forgetting is that
there are two principle categories of differences between genders- genetic and societal. Genetic differences are innate and ubiquitous across cultures.
They're the ways in which men and women differ on the most basic biological level.
Societal differences are the pressures that societal gender roles exert on individuals of a given gender.
Let's start by looking a little closer at the genetic factors.
Genetic differences have proven difficult for games to address in ways that aren't superficial.
Women tend to be more dexterous than men and generally have a higher threshold for pain,
while men tend to be physically larger and have more muscle
mass, so I mean hey, at least we got that part covered, sort of.
Actually come to think of it, games very rarely show women as being more dexterous or
Ah, whatever.
You know what? that wasn't really the important
part anyway. On a genetic level one of the principle differences is obviously the ability to bear children.
But despite how obvious that difference is we've yet to see a video game that really addresses themes of motherhood, fertility,
or other childbearing issues in depth.
Yeah, I know we've had plenty of games that have a mother character or a mother figure or a
character with mother issues or a character that just says mother all the time,
but we've never really had a character explore motherhood as a theme in depth
or put the player in a mother-type role. At least, not one that can be taken seriously.
And it's not like we couldn't make a great game out of that theme. Hell,
it could be pretty powerful.
Off the top of my head, the struggle of a mother trying to protect her children while crossing a war-torn country. Now that could easily
make for an exciting action title.
But honestly the industry is still having a hard enough time plumbing the emotional depths of conflicts that male designers can relate to, so we've
probably still got some growing up to do before we have any hope of
successfully tackling subject matter like that. Although I imagine that a well done game about a mother's sacrifice for her children could be a strong
contender for the first game to really make you break down and cry. Just saying. But alright, enough about genetic factors
Let's move to look at things which are societal. The important thing to remember here
is that these are malleable qualities. The reason we so often fall into the trap of delivering female
stereotypes in games rather than true believable female characters is because we tend to think of everything related to being female as
inherent to being female.
We often assume things like, girls like pink or girls are demure, to be inherent female traits when these are really societal constructions.
When you take these as fundamental qualities of being female, when you assume that they just are, they become things that cannot be struggled against,
things that can't be changed, and change is where character is found.
looking at these things from the perspective that societal pressures encourage girls to like pink or
encourage girls to be demure allows you the opportunity to flesh out your characters by showing their reactions to these pressures and
fleshing out your society by understanding the pressures it puts on women you could as easily have a society where girls like black and girls
shoot first because these qualities are variable and let me tell you it would make for a totally different place than your girls like pink society.
Now, I'm not saying that societal factors are totally independent of genetic ones
but they're a good place to start looking for how we can move from delivering cardboard
stereotypes of women to delivering more fleshed out, more human female characters.
Now, this is fairly easy to do in larger
epic narrative pieces
But you can get the job done with your gameplay, setting, andn just a few telling moments despite our complaints regarding this thing,
I'd argue that the Metroid series is one of the better examples of this.
Even though the early Metroid games are pretty bare-bones when it comes to plot and story,
there are a variety of subtle hints that can be drawn from the designers choices
Samus feels like a character because we know she stands apart from society.
We don't know much about her,
but it's easy to tell that she's made choices that don't fully conform to whatever societal standards she comes from.
That's what makes her interesting.
That's what draws us in and compels us to try and fill in the blanks ourselves. All of those great action-heavy heroines.
we love most have this trait.
They neither fully accept nor fully reject the societal pressures exerted on them and most importantly, they in the relationship to those societal pressures change
as their circumstances change
They're forced to reevaluate what they took for granted as they're placed in fantastic abnormal situations. With these sort of characters,
we see their personality and their struggles with expected norms come out through game play.
We see each of these characters evolve in real time as they respond to the circumstances around them. Their actions as much as their words
demonstrate character growth.
Now, it's important to note here that you're going to get just as stereotypical a character by having them reject all of society's gender pressures
There's as much depth to be found in understanding why a character agrees with or follows gender norms from their society as in
why they reject them. All of the great characters we've discussed here are a blend of accepting and rejecting
what society expects of their gender, because simply put this is what real human beings do.
So, if you want to create a truly great female character you have to either be willing to brave those few issues
which are truly unique to the feminine half of our species or you have to give us a human being
responding to ordinary societal pressures, perhaps under extraordinary circumstances, and coming to their own conclusions about how to integrate them.
A great character doesn't have to be defined by their gender,
but gender and the pressures that society exerts on us because of it are a big part of who we are.
So if you want to create a character that really feels real
consider all the factors that shape them to be who they are at the point where the player first meets them.
I guess that's about it with some luck we'll be seeing more truly great female characters in our games more often in the coming years.
Cross your fingers and keep an eye out. Later.