some airlines are not going to start charging people for on
luggage that they bring
on the flight with that ok yes sala opera carry-on luggage some hair companies amai
companies are gonna charge about forty five dollars
a spirit airline is gonna charge forty five dollars style
the american association of nude recreation they expect it might be a better idea to go
on
vacations
mickey scott and a cases are when you go travelling %uh to places where you get to be taken so
you don't have to bring like it
think about it
%um aren't now binit that apparently some companies are also booking flights where you
can be naked right here's what i'm not interested sit next to me to do it on a plane yahoo specially
because holed up with a if you've got
apparently the supplemental
when you want to get up to go to the doctor when you're running up against people all
over the nak
now i have to say though this is probably the second thing that pisses me off %uh when
it comes to paying like i hate me for parking and now i'm gonna hate paying for
%uh like it to carry a message
that's forty five dollars to carry on baggage that's crazy
well there's an easy answer that though and look you know today there's a new story out
about how but democrats of includes a few more
anne frank lautenberg or %uh thingy regulating the airline so that %uh they can't charge
you for
i carry on back soon
totally against that why that's just too much government birthday dull but then charge whatever
you want and don't take their flight okay everybody know spirits charging
now under people less likely to go on spirit if one airline starts doing it all the other
ones are gonna falling down a i've no problem that that's free market
i mean you could say hey you know of nike says charging more for their shoes those reebok
a new bells
okay so they fed or villagers son somebody'll come up that charges leicestershire
not and i
that's the way too much regulation so i'm not having that but you know if you're mad
about it that's perfectly the acceptable and understandable but they spirit i think that
idon't think that's way too much regulation i think that's not regulate no regulation
it all charging forty-five dollars for carry-on luggage really don't care about them
don't shoot don't buy their flights
there's a lot of whites in the countryside like health insurance it's gonna change that's
what she said
is a prediction that this could be wrong but
if they'll start doing it
then next evans we not just drive to boston
antsy to get there before as you know it
it's not gonna happen under look because i'll tell you but they're not always that always
helpful
note the view
%uh wind up doing that
and it is gonna be in other classes is going to the forty five dollars in somewhere else
and then you're playing with the market too much to slam charge whatever they want to
do
anti-nuclear the accuplacer actually overall very very cheap residents i mean it's not
cheap process is selling like i'm what that person when i go to
new york across a lot of money but relatively speaking given the cost of fuel given the
tax involved at cetera
with those flights could be a helluva lot more expensive a lot of those companies actually
should go underwear supporting too many of them
no that's impropriety in my mind that's an area where the free barca should definite
be able to
organic looking into regulated airlines will crash into one
jeffrey any registration but how much they charge that's their business damaging but
i think it's if you cannot if you got to do it
put in the price of flight
don't give it to me right at the white plunge of flight you prepared to take it
and michael by the way
yum this can be a man walking through the application of because each of our kids
switches button dated insist on site you are a maybe where do a flight plan and they may
change at the last second i think it's guys ice-t_ and another thing okay see you have
to pay to check your luggage and and then you have to pay for carry-on luggage
you have to pay both ways
so unlike let's say what the examples here airline you have to pay forty five dollars
for your %uh %uh what is it
mascara yeah i got but when you're let's say it like from l_a_ to new york so
when i'm on my way that new york i have to pay twenty five dollars on my way back to
l_a_ to new york added another forty five dollars right now i'm looking cookie addressee
s point they should be very very clear when you're buying the ticket no question they
shouldn't spring that on right
but that everybody knows almost everybody knows the spirits charge an extra forty five
bucks
and as a result like they're doing it it's because
is there just putting it in your ticket price to try to get you to bring less stuff on
so they have less fuel costs so then they went on both
sites less fuel costs and they charge you more
that helps their bottom line
but for the eighty eighth time if you don't like that that's an extra ninety bucks
makes perfect sense take another flight
not budging on same with yeah i mean above but your your ignored the point of
what about what the next five days the same thing 'cause it will
that okay and with that but that's life man at i'm not going to regulate the cost of sneakers
or cars or
or exit is what it is
so no believe me it's gonna have terrible consequences of any snags
too long to get into now and it's easy for me to say
%uh like here we when we evaluate the price of loyal atwood nixon did in the nineteen
seventies it totally screwed up the whole market at one of hurting the economy a helluva
lot more the stagflation that that carter was hit with as axel argument to be made was
because of nixon and his price controls so i i think i i don't think the government should
be about price controls and all in the in those terms that if it's a matter of life
and death
whether the planes crash you know what other health insurance
fire police
absolutely that's really the government
but it was just a matter which flight you take and how much across now that's for the
market
my thoughts are