WHEN IT COMES TO CLIMATE CHANGE WE TEND TO FOCUS MOST OF
OUR ATTENTION ON THE ATMOSPHERE AND WAS GOING ON IN IT.
BEING
ABLE TO VOTE AND REGISTER TO VOTE AND REGISTER ON THE SAME
DAY, VOTER SUPPRESSION AND MULTIPLE DIFFERENT FORMS, THE
OCEAN AND HOW THE OCEAN IS BEEN CHANGING OVER TIME.
PARTICULAR
HOW IT HAS HELPED TO SLOW SOME OF THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
UP TO THIS POINT BUT PERHAPS NOT FOR MUCH LONGER.
TURNS OUT THAT
SINCE 1970 GLOBAL WATERS HAVE BEEN A POWERFUL ALLY AGAINST
GLOBAL WARMING OBSERVING 93% OF THE HUMAN CARBON DIOXIDE
RELEASED BY HUMAN ACTIVITIES.
THIS IS ACCORDING TO A REPORT
RELEASED BY THE NATIONAL UNION OF CONSERVATION OF NEIGHBOR
NATURE.
THEY SAY IF THE OCEANS WEREN'T THERE TO PROTECT US AND
HADN'T ABSORBED A HUGE AMOUNT OF CARBON ARE LOWER APIS ATMOSPHERE
WOULD'VE ARTIE HEATED UP BY 36∞C WHICH DOES NOT MEAN THERE ARE
TEMPERATURES ON THE SURFACE WOULD BE 36∞C HIGHER BUT IT
WOULD'VE BEEN AN INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL WARMING IN
THE ATMOSPHERE THAT WAS THANKFULLY A BERNADOTTE THE
OCEAN WHICH HAS BEEN WARMING WILL CONTINUE TO WARM BY BETWEEN
1 TO 4∞C BY 2100 WHICH IS NOT A LONG WAY OFF AND THAT IS AN
ABSOLUTELY MASSIVE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL WARMING WHICH WILL
HAVE A NUMEROUS EFFECTS ON THE ANIMALS THAT LIVE THERE AND
THE REST OF THE WORLD THAT WE ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH
SOME OF THE EFFECTS IN JUST A 2ND.
I WAS THINK THAT IT'S FUNNY, IT WOULD'VE WARNED OF NOT FOR
THE OCEAN, I GOT IT, BUT WE WOULD ALL BE INCINERATED IF NOT
FOR THE OZONE LAYER.
THE OCEANS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THERE.
YEAH BUT WE DIDN'T KNOW HOW STRONG OF AN EFFECT THEY
WERE HAVING AND ABSORBING CARBON AND THAT WILL NOT PERHAPS
CONTINUE BECAUSE IN THE REPORT THEY TALK ABOUT THE FACT
THAT THERE IS A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF CARBON THAT IT CAN
OBSERVE AND IT IS REACHING IT.
I JUST THINK THE PHRASING IS ODD.
IF NOT FOR THE MOON,
WITH THE SUN DISTINGUISHES WE ARE GOING TO FREEZE VERY
QUICKLY.
SHOW ME A REPORT ABOUT THAT.
IT'S JUST ANOTHER STEP THAT WE HAVE MAXED OUT THE PROTECTION
THE OCEANS CAN GIVE US AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING.
THE INDICATION
FOR ME WOULD BE THAT THE NEXT HUNDRED YEARS WERE OBVIOUSLY BE
MUCH WORSE THAN THE LAST HUNDRED YEARS THAT THE LAST.
WE EITHER NEED TO CHANGE HOW WE CONSUME AND PRODUCE
ENERGY, CLEAN ATMOSPHERE, OR GENERATE ANOTHER OCEAN.
ONLY 70% OF THE PLANET, LET'S FIND SOME MORE WATER.
IT IS TOO BAD THAT WE DIDN'T GET LUCKY.
SPEAK FOR YOURSELF.
THAT CLIMATE CHANGE DIDN'T MAKE THINGS BETTER.
IN SOME WAYS IT HAS DONE IN LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES MAY BE.
BUT IT WASN'T ONLY GOT THIS IS GREAT THE RESULT OF CLIMATE
CHANGE IS THAT FOOD GROWS CLICK QUICKER AND HEALTHIER AND
BETTER.
BUT IT DIDN'T.
THAT IS TOO BAD.
IS JUST MORE EVIDENCE.
A STORY LIKE THIS COMES OUT AFTER
LABOR DAY SO WE HAVE A SIGNIFICANT CLIMATE CHANGE STORY
WHICH MIGHT RESONATE WITH PEOPLE AND THEREFORE INCREASES THE
POSSIBILITY THAT PEOPLE ARE AT LEAST GOING TO TALK ABOUT IN THE
COMING DAYS ALTHOUGH OUR TALK TO ACTION RACE SHE'LL ON CLIMATE
CHANGE IS NOT GREAT IN THIS COUNTRY OR THE WORLD.
ARE IMPORTANCE TO TALK RADIO IS IN GOOD ART TALK TO
ACTION RATIOS EVEN WORSE.
HOPEFULLY HILLARY CLINTON IS ELECTED SHE WILL STEP TO THE
PLATE IN A MEANINGFUL WAY ON CLIMATE CHANGE.
OF COURSE WE
ALL KNOW WE CAN'T DO IT ON OUR OWN.
WE ARE ONE MIGHTY COUNTRY BUT WE ARE ONLY ONE.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT OBAMA HAS DONE WHICH HAS FALLEN SHORT
IN A LOT OF WAYS BUT IT'S STILL IMPORTANT THAT HE IS GOTTEN US
INVOLVED IN SOME INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS THAT ARE THE ONLY
CHANCE WE HAVE ACTUALLY STOP THIS.
AGREEMENTS WHICH DONALD
TRUMP SAYS WE BELIEVE ON DAY ONE.
IN THE FIRST 35 MINUTES WE HAVE HAD ON TWO CRITICAL ISSUES.
VOTER RIGHTS FOR MINORITIES AND CLIMATE CHANGE.
2 REASONS WHY A VOTE FOR JILL STEIN IS A TERRIBLE MISTAKE.
MILLION SOME HIGHER PRINCIPLE AND NOBLE ONE, BUT A VOTE
FOR HER IS A TERRIBLE MISTAKE.
AT THE VERY LEAST, IN STATES WITHOUT BOAT COULD BE THE
DIFFERENCE.
THERE ARE PLENTY OF PLACES WHERE IT COULD NOT BE A
DISH DIFFERENCE.
IS NOT JUST A VOTE BUT IT'S ADVOCATING.
YOU MUST GOING
NEGATIVE AND ADVOCATING AGAINST TRUMP.
FIND GO THAT WAY AS
OPPOSED TO ADVOCATING FOR HILLARY BUT ESPECIALLY PEOPLE
WITH A PLATFORM.
EVERYBODY'S GOT A PLATFORM BECAUSE EVERYBODY
HAS A NAME AND NO ONE IS AS INFLUENTIAL AS YOUR FRIENDS.
FOR AS MUCH AS YOU WANT TO LISTEN TO BILL O'REILLY
AND I
HATE USING THEM BUT NOBODY AS INFLUENTIAL AS THOSE PEOPLE
MIGHT BE OR ANY PUNDIT MIGHT BE, NO ONE IS AS INFLUENTIAL AS YOUR
FRIEND LARRY WHO SAYS I'VE BEEN READING THIS AND TRUMP IS
DANGEROUS.
YOU TALK AND HAVE BREAKFAST TOGETHER AND THEN YOU
HAVE CONVINCE SOMEONE WHO SAY I WAS GOING TO VOTE FOR GARY
JOHNSON BUT WE CAN'T HAVE TRUMP SO I'M GOING TO VOTE FOR HILLARY
CLINTON.
THEY LIVE IN OHIO AND IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE.
STEP TWO
WOULD BE GOING THE OTHER WAY AND REALIZING, BECAUSE AGAIN, I LOVE
THINK GARY JOHNSON MAY TAKE VOTES FROM DONALD TRUMP BUT
RIGHT NOW IT'S VERY CLEAR THAT IT'S ABOUT EVEN AND WHO IS
TAKING VOTES.
I'VE SEEN DIFFERENT THINGS.
THEY ARE CONFLICTING AT BEST.
BEST CASE THERE CONFLICTING, WORST-CASE IS A CLEANEST
DOING WORSE.
JOHNSON IS THE SECOND MOST POPULAR ALONG YOUNG VOTERS.
IF I CHANGE MY MIND ON THIS AFTER CLINTON IS OUT ELECTED,
THE MOST INTERESTING PEOPLE ARE HYPOCRITES.
I HAVE NO INTEREST
AT ALL IN HAVING A MEAL PEOPLE WHO ARE HAVING CRITICAL AT ALL.
IF HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT SUFFICIENTLY PROGRESSIVE AND
OBVIOUSLY EVERYONE WILL HAVE A DIFFERENT STANDARD ON THAT BUT
IF THIS IS ALL NONSENSE AND HER OPPOSITION TO THE TPP WHICH I
DON'T OPPOSE US MOTHERS DO BUT HER OPPOSITION TO, IF SHE BACKS
OFF OF $15 AND SHE BACKS OFF OF HER PLAN TO PROVIDE DEBT RELIEF
FOR COLLEGE AND IF SHE IS NOT SERIOUS ABOUT RESTORING VOTING
RIGHTS IN AREAS THAT THE PRESIDENT CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
AND RESTRICTING THE NONVIOLENT PRISON POPULATION, IF SHE BACKS
OFF, THEN GO GET HER.
EVEN IF THAT MEANS LOSING AND 20/20.
I'VE A FEELING THAT IS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.
I DON'T ME GO GET HER.
I MEAN LITERALLY GO GET HER.
FUND
AND SUPPORT RUSS ONE GOLD FOR HIS 20/20 RUN FOR PRESIDENT.
HAVE A DIFFERENT NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT AND RISK LOSING TO
THAT REPUBLICAN WHO I TRUST WON'T BE AS AWFUL AS DONALD
TRUMP.
THE SHOULD HE SITUATION THAT WE FIND OURSELVES IN IS IF
CLIMATE CHANGE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE TO YOU WHICH IT
IS TO MANY PEOPLE, I THINK IT PROBABLY SHOULD BE, IF HILLARY
CLINTON DID NOTHING NEW TO FORESTALL THE EFFECTS OF OUR
WARNING WARMING CLIMATE AND ALL THAT, IT WOULD STILL BE FAR
BETTER THAN CHUM BECAUSE TRUMP SAYS HE IS GOING TO ELIMINATE
ALL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONS THAT OBAMA HAS PUT
INTO EFFECT AS PRESIDENT.
THAT IS A BAD SITUATION BUT ALSO NOT
THAT COMPLICATED TO FIGURE OUT WHICH IS THE BETTER OF THE 2.
LET'S TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE EFFECTS.
IF THE CLIMATE
CONTINUES TO HEAT THE WAY IT IS ESPECIALLY THE OCEANS WHICH AS I
SAID WE DON'T FOCUS ON NEARLY ENOUGH, A NUMBER OF THINGS ARE
GOING TO TAKE PLACE.
LET'S TALK ABOUT SOME OF THOSE.
ENTIRE
SPECIES POPULATIONS SUCH AS PLANKTON, JELLYFISH, TORTOISE,
AND SEABIRDS ARE MOVING TOWARD THE POLES UP TO 10∞ LATITUDE
WHICH ON A GLOBAL SCALE IS A LONG WAY, TAKING UP RESIDENCE IN
WATERS PREVIOUSLY TOO COLD TO SUPPORT THEM.
THAT'S FIVE TIMES
FASTER THAN LAND ANIMALS ARE MIGRATING NORTH.
THAT DOES NOT
ONLY MEAN THAT FISHING BOATS NEED TO TRAVEL LITTLE BIT MORE.
THAT COULD IRREPARABLY HARM OUR ABILITY TO GET FISH OUT OF THE
OCEAN AND FEED OUR POPULATION.
IN SOUTHEAST ASIA, AS FISH LEAVE
THEIR HOMES MARINE FISHERIES MAY FALL UP TO 30% BY 2050.
THE
LATEST MODELS PREDICT THAT BY 2050 WARMER OCEANS WILL BLEACH
NEARLY ALL OF THE WORLD'S REEF.
WE'VE SEEN A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF
THAT.
IF YOU ARE NOT CONCERNED WITH THE REEFS AND YOU ARE NOT
CONCERNED WITH ANIMALS, I UNDERSTAND, WE ARE VERY HUMAN
CENTRIC SPECIES, BUT IT WILL ALSO AFFECT US.
PEOPLE WHO LIVE NEAR OR
INTERACT WITH OCEAN COULD BE INCREASED RISK OF ILLNESS AS
WARMER OCEANS QUICKLY SPREAD PATHOGEN SUCH AS CHOLERA
CARRYING
BACTERIA AND ALGAE BLOOMS.
AS OCEAN WARMS, SO WILL SEVERE
WEATHER SUCH AS HURRICANES AND TYPHOONS.
THE LEADER THAT WE
TALKED ABOUT IN THE VIDEO WE SHOWED NOTED THE RARE DOUBLE
HURRICANES THAT RECENTLY SKIRTED HAWAII.
TYPES OF EXTREME
WEATHER THAT WE'VE NEVER SEEN BEFORE.
I DON'T KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT THIS, BUT I KNOW THAT THAT MAKES
ME LIKE THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF AMERICANS.
I THINK IF I WERE
TO ADVISE CLIMATE CHANGE ADVOCATES, PEOPLE WHO THINK WE
NEED TO DO SOMETHING, THEY NEED TO BE SCARED.
THAT IS
WHAT WORKS.
THAT'S HOW REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN ELECTED TO
OFFICE.
WE CAN'T JUST SAY 1 TO 4∞C BY 2100.
WE CAN'T JUST SAY 50% OF THE REEFS WILL BE DESTROYED.
IT NEEDS TO BE TANGIBLE.
REEFER MADNESS ISN'T ENOUGH?
JOSH FOX IS INCREDIBLY SMART AND A GIFTED FILMMAKER BUT
HE WAS REALLY HESITANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT STUFF AND I
THINK IT IS A MISTAKE.
THE HUMAN CONSEQUENCES?
LIKE HUNGER.
CHILDREN DYING.
IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A
DIFFERENCE, THEN YOU'LL HAVE TO GO EXTREME.
MAYBE YOU'LL PUSH A
LITTLE TOO FAR.
OBVIOUSLY MODELS ARE DIFFERENT, BUT WE
KNOW THAT REASONABLE MODELS HAVE PRETTY EXTREME CIRCUMSTANCES.
I
THINK WE NEED MORE OF THAT BECAUSE WHAT REALLY MOTIVATES
AMERICANS AND THE WORLD, BUT CERTAINLY WHAT MOTIVATES US IS
FEAR.
EVEN IF HE GETS CRUSHED WE ARE GOING TO HAVE 45
MANY PEOPLE VOTING FOR DONALD TRUMP.
SOMETHING TO REMEMBER.
NO MATTER HOW AWFUL HE IS, EVEN IF HILLARY WINS BY 12 POINTS,
HE'S GOING TO HAVE 45 MILLION PEOPLE VOTING FOR HIM.
THEY WOULD STILL BE THERE WATCHING TRUMP TV.
THEY WILL BE THERE WEDNESDAY MORNING.