Hello everyone, I'm Domingo Gomes from NewEsc and
You know, over the past few days I've had
the opportunity to test the Redmi Note 9S
who has this beautiful back camera
and no, I'm not kidding, I think I know
it is a unique and differentiating design
but which will surely in its next
version change completely because that way
is Xiaomi. Anyway, let's not mess around
and let's talk about what it's really like
important of the results obtained
with the stock camera and the
google. So far I haven't found
no port that works 100%,
especially with the cameras
There is one in XDA Developers
which is a beta and works well in
daytime photos but during the night
the photos have these green tones that
I wasn't quite convinced, so
after testing several applications
because the one that has worked best for me is
one from URNYX that I'll leave at the
description of this video and that you can
easily install on your Redmi Note 9S
That's not perfect. It's still missing.
some optimization especially in the
flash as you will see in this comparison
but so far I think it's the best
but before we start, if you don't have
idea what I'm talking about, you don't know
what is the stock camera, the
google, the Gcam... Take a look at this
video in which in three or four
minutes I explain the essentials and what
you need to know about all this
Well, the first big difference
between the stock camera and the Gcam is
exposure when you see them on your mobile
seem clearer and sharper
but when you're on a computer and you see the
photos on a slightly larger monitor
you realize that there are some
details that have disappeared what in
reality can be a problem
depending on the situation what most
I like about the Gcam is that it knows when
should or should not increase exposure to
improve photography in a very
natural anyway the photos of the
stock camera are usually a little more
attractive for social networks and
this is also due to the saturation that
in some cases is exaggerated and changes
the colors, as has happened here with my
my cat and in which you can see
clearly what I mean. This is not
is nothing new but I thought Xiaomi already
I had learned my lesson.
Come on, those leaves look like
radioactive and you don't even
I'm showing the pictures I took with
artificial intelligence activated
because if I do, it looks more like
instagram filter than anything else. Go to
that I'm also just showing you
the results more
Extravagant and in most
situations the pictures obtained are
decent and pretty good I'd say but
how do I know you're not here to see those
photos because I continue with the differences
the next one lies in the dynamic range
that in simple situations up to
gets a good balance but when
we asked for something else the google camera with
its hdr plus mode is unbeatable other
aspect that is still maintained in the
Xiaomi cameras is the smoothing of
some items like this that you can
see here is something that happens more often
in night photos but in day photos
we can also see it before
to continue we must talk about something that
is a and has not yet achieved
to perfect the white balance with
the following picture you will clearly notice the
difference... Holy shit...
wrong picture... This is the one I wanted you
show. I already told you that the color
of the cat was not so saturated but
pay attention to the pillow that is
something more yellow in the stock I don't see the
increased exposure and saturation
as a problem of this device a
when most people
you'll hardly see the pictures there
on the screen of the mobile and also just
wants them to be shared in networks
social or send friends but when you see
these photos and compare them to others that
are a little more natural, more real is
impossible not to notice the difference and my
opinion on this is that when you're
analyzing a good camera what
you want the end result to be what
more like reality because man
if you already have that
then in post-editing you can do the
that you feel like it and talking about it
so let's take a little test. In this
photo if I want to get a result
similar to the stock camera, the only thing
what I need to do is increase the saturation
about five little points and then the
intensity about 60 and there was the
we have another example in which we just
with increasing the saturation a bit and the
we have even better luminosity
results that the camera stocks without
it seems so artificial the problem
is also in the interpretation of the
color of the software that in my opinion
I think it's made up of a way
so that when you see it on your cell phone
you're so surprised that in some cases
I seem to have the intelligence
activated, but not the
Xiaomi's camera with a super
saturation that if you activate the
artificial intelligence is multiplied
by two or three and watch out that this too
occurs during the night in pictures
night-time with some eastern lighting
increased exposure and saturation in
the stock camera therefore helps to
see some objects better is true
but I want to ask you a question: what is
what you're looking for a camera? To saturate
the photos or give you the most
realistic? Both answers are
completely valid but it is important
to know the differences. The first is
that shadows and blacks will not be
so deep the second is that some
colors will intensify and others will even
will change and the third is that there are
important details that are lost and
give more realism to the picture. The only
section in which the stock room
has better results is in the photos
with flash but this is probably better in
future versions
and that they are best optimized in photos
in very low light and with the
night activated the differences are
abysmal and just for this you should
to have the cam installed but attention that
we also have a way to
astrophotography that will allow you to do
photos like this at a time when
the stock with the night mode does not get
I'm not really surprised to see anything
see what we can achieve with such
only change one application and without having
idea of photography the last section
that I compared is the one on the camera
and there's not much here that's
say the stock camera still carries the
beauty filter every time I open the
app and there's no way to turn it off
permanently while in the fecam
we have a good color balance
shadows and sharpness the dynamic range the
exposure also continues to be better in
the google camera by far is
quite notorious once again it's as if
I was getting ready to take the picture
be shared in social networks and not
to express reality I will not talk about the
video mode because I don't usually use it
in the fecam already
of this is having some problems
in slow motion for example when
tries to access this mode because the
application closes sth. that
it will surely come to be solved
in future versions of this port but
don't worry that in the next video
comparison of photographs I will make
versus redmi noto 8 pro and mi A3
then I'll do some video tests
so you can see and compare the
results anyway, I think I've either already
my still hasn't learned anything about
what then people in the
The west wants to be worth the filter of
beauty even if I turn it off, it's still
working the same for the overcoming
and exposure if we want it to increase
Well, leave it to the intelligence
if we deactivate the
artificial intelligence still has
values that are too high and in addition to
this is not good clarity
some photographs are still losing
important details but less man
badly that we have the possibility of
install it Gcam in a completely
free, safe and easy in a
device that costs
Just 210 euros I think I've seen it
for this price and well if you like the
photography and you want that a camera
and not a camera
with integrated photoshop installs the jlca
you'll thank me and well I hope you guys
that you liked this comparison and
if so leave a like and subscribe and
If you have any questions, you can ask them.
leave in comments see you on
next bye-bye
[Music]