- We paid over $30,000 to get every version
of Apple's new M1 Pro and M1 Max MacBooks
and now that we finally got our grubby paws on them,
we can really put them through their paces.
We're focusing on the 14 inch M1 Pro MacBook today,
both the 8/14 core and the 10/16 core models.
Not only are we going to review
and benchmark the all new redesign from notch to bottom,
we're going to answer all the questions Apple wouldn't,
and the question of who our sponsor is, it's Crucial!
Thanks to Crucial for sponsoring this video,
get more done with Crucial's P5+ NVMe SSD
with up to 6,600 megabytes per second sequential reads
at a five-year warranty,
Crucial makes tech to last,
get yours today at the link below.
(upbeat music)
As soon as you lay eyes on the new MacBooks,
the flattened edges strike you in the same way
older generation MacBooks did.
This is in stark contrast to the 2016 pedigree of MacBooks
that did everything in their power to hide their dimension
by adding curves wherever possible,
looking kind of like an envelope
with something bulging out from it.
This refreshed flattened design philosophy
just so happens to allow Apple to stuff
more functionality into the new machines.
It's almost like thin at any cost held them back.
Imagine that.
While the changes keep rolling back,
we're looking at a new touch bar less keyboard
with basically zero deck flex,
and thankfully they brought back the function keys.
Personally, I'd still like to have the touch bar,
maybe stick with half height function keys,
and sneak it in there.
Just so long as I get function keys,
like look how much faster it is to mute a Mac
with function keys than with the touch bar.
It's not even a contest
and there's no contest that MagSafe always has been
and always will be the best charging method
for an expensive laptop like a MacBook Pro.
Not only is the new implementation much shallower
and thus less likely to hook your laptop off the desk,
but it's capable of fast charging it up to 96 Watts
depending on which charger you end up with.
What's more, the number one complaint people
had about MagSafe that the cable frayed over time,
I've had it happen.
That's been largely addressed here.
Thanks not only to a much more supple braided cable,
but also the fact that it's a detachable type C connector
on the other end, mind you,
Apple is still charging $50 for a mere six foot replacement,
but that's still cheaper
and less wasteful than a new power adapter.
Besides you can always charge via type C if you want,
you just won't get fast charging,
but there's one thing here
that has never been on any Apple notebook
or to my knowledge, any previous notebook,
the notch,
it looks a smidge larger
than the notch on my iPhone 11 Pro Max
and inside is a single 1080p webcam.
Apple's justification for the notch's size on Iphones
is that they need the extra space to house face ID sensors,
and these laptops don't have face ID.
Maybe the true depth sensors are too thick for the housing.
Maybe smaller sensors were expected to be available,
but the silicon shortage delayed them.
Why then did Apple not wait for the next generation?
It just feels like they planned for it,
realized at the last minute, crap we can't make it work,
and then thought, (beep) it ship it as it is.
But mind you, the webcam in that notch is quite good.
I'll be it, marred with a skin smoothing algorithm
that I can't find a way to turn off.
It takes effect both in Photo Booth and QuickTime,
still the image is otherwise quite sharp around the edges.
With a little tweaking,
I think it could actually be one of the better webcams
integrated into a laptop.
Certainly far better even now than Dell's.
And how about that microphone anyway?
Not too shabby if you ask me.
The speakers though, Apple says they've got
four counter firing woofers and two tweeters,
and quite frankly, it sounds so much better
than anything else I've heard in a laptop
that it's not even close.
(upbeat music)
Sorry XPS 15, you sound like trash by comparison.
Apple's definitely tuned these speakers
with a sweet spot in mind.
And that sweet spot seems to be sitting at a desk.
When you're in that sweet spot,
the frequency response is at its best
and stereo imaging is almost like
you've got widely separated speakers.
I almost wish we had a binaural recording rig
so I could show you.
(upbeat music)
I can show you the display though.
This, this is beautiful.
It reminds me of my TV at home
with its 2000 local dimming zones
and 1600 nits peak brightness,
just crammed into a much smaller form factor
thanks to the mini LED backlight array
that Apple calls XDR.
The other big feature is the new
120 Hertz adaptive refresh rate Pro Motion support
that can go as low as 24 Hertz to save on battery life
during an activity.
Apple's way out ahead of Windows on this one,
way out thanks to having first baked this into the iPad line
several years ago.
It's not quite 4k,
but Apple has a history of
not targeting specific resolutions,
but rather specific pixel densities.
And in that regard, it's close to 4k
and definitely retina from any reasonable distance,
which is really all that matters day to day.
For professionals, a separate pixel matched external display
for critical viewing is common
and can be hooked up via any one of the three
display port enabled Thunderbolt 4 ports
or the full-size HDMI 2.0 port,
which can handle up to 4k60 with HDR.
HDMI 2.1 support for 120 Hertz would have been nice
on a top of the line laptop like this,
but honestly this wouldn't be too useful
for non-gamers right now anyway,
unless you're working with 8K for some reason,
4k60 is the most you're going to get
out of a typical projector or TV.
So it's just not a huge limiter.
Now we don't have the M1 Max Macs in for testing yet,
but we can put the M1 Pro through its paces
with some PC competition, a Surface Laptop Studio,
an ASUS Zephyrus G14,
and if those fail, we've got our trusty GPU bench
to show it what for.
Starting with good old Cinebench,
we've got our first impressive showing,
our 10 core MacBook Pro matches
the Zephyrus's top end Ryzen nine,
and the eight core stomps the Surface Laptop Studio
and the MacBook Pro 13 inch as well.
Geekbench brings more pain for Microsoft,
and even the Zephyrus takes a beating
from the 8 core M1 Pro this time around.
Handbrake in software encoding
brings more good news for Apple
with only our Ryzen desktop outperforming the 10 core
in H.264
and the Zephyrus pulling a lead in the more complex
and thread hungry H.265 encoder.
When we turn on hardware encoding,
why is this MacBook so slow?
Okay, it looks like Apple's video toolbox has some issues
with the new media engine right now.
So unfortunately these results are unusable,
but I'm including them here
because this is something you might run into
if you pick one of these puppies up.
Compressor gives us a better look at what the hardware
and coding performance looks like,
and strangely it seems like whatever Apple did
with the media engine to add ProRes support
negatively affected H.265 in preference to H.264,
which is a strange balance to make,
but it's not a big difference either way it's just weird.
In Final Cut both the new MacBooks put up numbers
roughly double what the original M1 Mac MacBook could,
which is largely down to the additional GPU cores
and ProRes encoding is almost three times faster than M1,
thanks to that new media engine
that turned Apple's $2,000 Afterburner card
into retro tech.
Video's not everything people do with their Macs though.
So let's come back around to 3d modeling with Blender.
As of right now, Apple silicon
isn't natively supported by Blender,
but Apple has joined the Blender Development Fund
and provided patches to enable Metal going forward.
So stay tuned for that.
For now CPU rendering performance isn't too shabby
with the 10 core M1 Pro beating out the Zephyrus
in both the shorter BMW render
and the sustained classroom render,
which is ridiculously good.
Adobe Creative Cloud mostly runs in Rosetta as well,
and unfortunately that means that either
PugetBench will often crash
or in the case of the few available Apple silicon versions
of these apps, simply not work.
We do have Photoshop numbers though,
and these show very similar performance to the M1,
perhaps because of Rosetta,
but also perhaps because of the lightly threaded nature
of the work.
What isn't lightly threaded is code compilation.
and it's here that M1 Pro comes back to dominance.
Even the eight core M1 Pro outperforms
the best mobile Ryzen chip on the market.
And the 10 core is second only to the desktop Ryzen 9 5950X.
It's ridiculously impressive
when something like this happens,
kind of like our new water bottles at lttstore.com,
you got to see the new lids and colors,
and even you can get 50% off a lid
if you bought one of the old ones.
Now we need to talk games.
I know, I know, games aren't a Mac thing,
I disagree, but more importantly,
they're a great way to visualize relative GPU horsepower.
Unfortunately for us,
I'm not aware of any game
that takes advantage of Apple silicon.
The ones that I thought did merely run in the Rosetta
as a result turn times in Civilization VI, for example,
are ludicrously long,
a good three times longer than the Surface Laptop Studio,
and Zephyrus.
This trend continues at CSGO
where it seems that despite having double the GPU cores
running in Rosetta is seriously hampering
the M1 Pro's performance potential.
Although there is a marked improvement
over the standard M1.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider, meanwhile does come close
to the RTX 3050 TI and our Surface Laptop Studio
and scales pretty linearly compared to the original M1.
Temperature readings on the cores can get alarmingly high
under sustained load.
Although those sensors are buried inside the SoC.
If we look at the integrated GPU clusters on the same SoC,
we see far more manageable temperatures.
So these core temps are not likely
to be a major cause of concern.
Strangely, the fans never even got to max speed.
I suppose I need to hit it with a combined CPU and GPU load
to really get to the scream.
Get subscribed by the way,
because we'll be comparing every chassis
and SoC's full thermal characteristics
throughout the rest of this series,
and you don't want to miss that.
This is just scratching the surface.
The main hotspot is in the middle of the keyboard,
where we read somewhere in from
46 to 48 degrees on both models.
While the palm rest area stays relatively cool
in the low thirties,
that's pretty similar across all of the laptops we tested
if a bit warmer on the hotspot.
Curiously, Apple has designed the cooling system
so that hot air is exhausting directly
onto the lower corners of the screen,
where it's getting as hot as 50 degrees or more,
which may be cause for concern over time.
My recommendation to combat this
is to manually set the fans to maximum
if you're doing a sustained all core load by using TG Pro
or another utility that can manage the fan speeds.
That should keep air flowing
and prevent heat from concentrating in one small spot.
Now we need to talk battery and to do this,
we turn the 13 inch MacBook display
down to about a third brightness,
matched all the laptops off as best we could,
fired up this YouTube countdown clock and cut the power.
Not only did the Zephyrus die hilariously quickly
at just under seven hours,
but the Surface Laptop Studio also ended up
dying a little early due to the GPU resetting partway in.
Next to fall was the M1 MacBook Pro
at just under 22 and a half hours,
and the lower end M1 Pro shortly after that.
And the 10/16, well, it kept going past the 24 hour mark.
Honestly, the only reason I can think of
that the lower end M1 Pro didn't hit the same milestone
was Horse was probably still logged in
and I didn't notice.
Ah, the joy's of having to share.
Still to say, this is luminary battery life
would be underselling it,
especially in light of the machine's capabilities
like the most comparable overall performer
is the Zephyrus and it got less than a third of that.
I need to see this thing's battery for myself,
pulling it apart is the same process
as with other recent Macs,
but now just two screw types, like my 2011 MacBook,
long in the back and short in the front
now with collars to prevent them from going too far.
Pop two clips on the left and right,
the panel slides right off,
now that is a pretty interior.
And it shows more of what Apple's doing
with that extra internal volume.
Not only is there more battery capacity
along with pull tabs for safer user servicing,
but there's a reasonably robust cooling solution,
and that battery no longer overlaps the logic board either.
Amazing what you can do with a little more volume, huh?
While we're under the hood,
I should mention that Wi-Fi is limited
to two spatial streams, so wireless AC, AKA Wi-Fi 5,
will top out at 866 megabits per second.
This has been standard for MacBooks since 2019
and is one of the few design elements
that Apple hasn't changed for the better.
If I had to guess why not,
these Mac's use Broadcom Wi-Fi Adapters,
while the ones with three by three support
were running on Murata chips that Apple co-designed
and branded as universal scientific industrial,
evidently those proved to either be too costly,
too unreliable, too power hungry, or all of the above.
If cost was a factor though,
Apple sure hasn't spared any for the Thunderbolt
because each of the USB type C ports
has its own Thunderbolt 4 controller.
Apple's doing a lot right here.
There's the return to an SD card slot,
albeit without SD Express support
and we've got a high impedance headphone jack
that while it doesn't sound amazing
is better able to drive higher end headphones
than previous gen Macs.
What Apple hasn't gotten right is the handling of the notch,
the mouse cursor going behind the notch
and getting lost seems like such a colossal oversight
next to the way that the rounded corners are handled
on the display,
and this behavior isn't even consistent
if you've got menus open.
What's more the notch's whole reason for being,
that is to provide a menu bar
above the regular 16 by 10 display area
that would otherwise just be bezeled,
is by default entirely removed
if you use full screen mode.
Like Apple, why?
Thankfully both of these issues
can be worked around by either turning off this setting
or by choosing get info on the app
and checking scale to fit.
The latter option nobody should ever want to use this.
The final issue I have is price,
starting at $2,000 US for the 14 inch model,
it's not going to be for everybody,
and as we've seen the base model falls behind
in a few fundamental ways.
And of course, because the memory is part of the SoC
and storage is soldered to the motherboard,
not only does that make future repairs more expensive,
you also need to order what you think you'll need
by the time you replace the laptop,
not what you think you'll need today.
Personally, I wouldn't go lower than 32 gigabytes of memory
to make a machine of this caliber last a while,
particularly considering it's unified memory
that both the CPU and GPU need to share.
I also wouldn't go higher than two terabytes
of internal storage
because you've got Thunderbolt for high-speed expansion,
if you need it.
That puts my sweet spot recommendation at about $2,900 US,
which is $200 more expensive than a similar configuration
for the Surface Laptop Studio
and a thousand dollars more expensive
than the 13 inch M1 MacBook Pro,
I'll be it with double the memory.
Is it a thousand dollars more worth it?
You really need to look at what tasks you do daily
to see how long it'll take to recoup that cost.
But what Apple has here,
what attracted me to my 2011 MacBook Pro in the first place
is a combination of power, form factor, build quality,
display quality, versatility, and especially battery life,
that while outclassed by less expensive machines
in any one metric is not even remotely matched in all.
It's still early days for Apple silicon
in the grand scheme of things
and Mac OS isn't everyone's cup of tea,
but you can't deny that Apple's got a good thing going here,
and so does our sponsor NordPass.
Today's sponsor is NordPass, security experts agree
humans are the weakest link when it comes to security.
Managing multiple complex passwords across all your apps
and devices are the pain in the butt.
It takes a bit of a leap for some,
but it's hard to look back
once you do get a password manager.
Even before updating your passwords,
you'll find relogging in from device to device a breeze,
setting up your new Mac, streaming at a buddy's house,
online payments, and so much more.
Now faster and encrypted on your device
so only you have access.
There are a few things as universally agreed upon
in cybersecurity than the need for a password manager.
NordPass makes it simple to remove that vulnerability
and brings tons of conveniences along the way.
They're offering LTT fans a special cyber month discount
of 70% off a two year plan
plus an additional month for free.
Go to nordpass.com/Linus
and use code Linus to start making your log-ins safer
and easier today.
Thanks for watching guys.
Go check out our initial coverage
of the 14 inch MacBook Pro announcement,
where we made the decision to buy all these laptops
in the first place.
Kind of want to take one home, play with it,
we've got enough of them coming in to cover for me, right?
- [Horse] Stop thief!