Near the end of World War II, a well-known occultist,
named Manly P. Hall, thought there was something
wrong with the world. Things had to change.
In spring of 1944 he made a startling statement. He said:
"To make things right we will have to undo
much that is cherished error. The problem of revising the Bible
shows how difficult it is to do this.
For the last hundred years we have been trying to get out
an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct;
but nobody wants it.
What's wanted is the good old King James version,
every jot and tittle of it, because most people are convinced
that God dictated the Bible to King James in English."
In another vlog I asked the question,
"Who is we?" Let's take that apart right now.
And while we're at it, we'll see
what the Sinaiticus might have to do with it.
Hi, I'm David Daniels from Chick Publications.
"To make things right we will have to undo
much that is cherished error."
"For the last hundred years we have been trying
to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct,
but nobody wants it."
By "we," it seems that Hall is referring to some
very high-up people in the occultic and political world.
That was the focus of his 1944 article,
Asia in the Balance of the Scales. And with "friends" like
33rd degree Masonic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt
and other leaders, Hall probably felt able to pull it off.
Listen to these quotes from the same article.
"In the next ten years we will have to rebuild
a world civilization. I hope for some psychologists
and even philosophers to be among those appointed
to administer this problem."
"We are thinking now of a world police force..."
"We will first perhaps try to make a great world plan."
"We will sit at a council table and figure how to iron out
the troubles on the earth."
Then this quote.
"The way of that conditioning would be the one used
in Central Europe to condition Nazi Minds.
There the circulation of an ideology began in the public schools,
began with the small child; which is where we will have to begin,
and educate not only our own people but the peoples of the world."
"And we will have to have five generations of
the consciousness concept of democratic cooperation
before we can create a world capable of mental
and emotional tolerance."
Let's count the generations after World War II, shall we?.
1946-64 were the Baby Boomers. That' s one.
1965-early 80s were Generation X. That's two. Mid-1980s-early 2000s were
the Millennials or Generation Y. That's three.
Mid-2000s to now are Generation Z, the fourth generation.
So how are we doing?
Pushing mental and emotional tolerance
and democratic cooperation through psychology
and philosophy, from kindergarten?
There's a whole lot of conditioning going on!
In fact, I just saw, today, that MTV asked
1,000 13-14 year olds which of the proposed names
they wanted their generation to be called.
The majority of them wanted to be called
"The Founder Generation." These teenagers,
born after 9/11, supposedly "have a
stunningly intuitive sense of the changing times
they've been born into, and the huge opportunity
that lies ahead to make new history."
Right here, out of this article.
"The Founder Generation: Founding a Whole New World."
What do "founders" do? They abandon the old
and start something new.
Guided by whom? Who are their teachers?
We are barreling toward a One World Government,
by Manly P. Hall's own standards. And we're only in Generation Four.
But Hall had a problem with a certain group of people.
What's wrong with them?
"What's wanted is the good old King James version,
every jot and tittle of it..."
How did his "we" try to pry the King James
out of people's hands?
"For the last hundred years we have been trying
to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct"
Occultist Hall wrote these words in what year? 1944.
What happened 100 years earlier, in 1844?
In 1844, according to text scholar
Constantin Tischendorf, he began to acquire
Greek vellum pages that ultimately were named,
"Codex Sinaiticus." You know, the document
behind all modern Bibles and Bible-doubting footnotes,
even in the New King James.
Are we sure Hall meant the Sinaiticus?
Let's check.
Manly P. Hall wrote strongly in favor of the Sinaiticus.
Here are two powerful quotes.
From the same 1944 magazine. I just got this together,
pieced it in by "snippets" today. Listen:
"The Codex Sinaiticus is a manuscript of the 4th Century
of about the same date as the Codex Vaticanus...."
And here. "This manuscript is
one of the great books of the world..."
And down here. "...it is sufficiently important
to justify considerable revision of our popular conception
of the Scriptural writings"
--In other words, changing the Bible.
From his Monthly Letter, New York, April 1st, 1935.
Yes, it was April Fools' Day. He wrote:
"Of importance to students of occultism
is the fact that the Codex Sinaiticus
contains many passages suppressed from
the published Gospels. These passages
in many cases greatly alter the significance of the text."
And what did he think of the King James?
In his Students Monthly Letter, Fourth Year, No. 5, he complained:
"But what does this mean to the average Bible student?
This enthusiastic jot and tittle worshiper
will insist that the words of the King James version
are the very words of God Himself."
And in his Monthly Letter of November 1st, 1934, he wrote:
"...the King James version of the Holy Bible.
This translation teems with error and is hopelessly unreliable
from a scholastic viewpoint, yet popular acceptance
has caused this mis-version of holy writ"
(yes, he said that) "to come to be
recognized as infallible so that the religious public
would now reject a correct translation.
In fact it has already shown its attitude in the matter
by refusing a revised edition. For over 300 years
erroneous theological notions have been circulated,
deriving their authority from the King James
translation of the Bibile [sic]."
So let's add it up.
1. This occultist, Manly P. Hall, wanted, what? a New World Order.
2. Only two things stopped this new "mental and emotional tolerance:"
the thinking of the people and the King James Bible.
3. People in general trusted that the King James version,
in 1944, was the words of God Himself
translated into English. So that's not, brothers and sisters,
a new idea. 4. The Codex Sinaiticus,
with extra words (and maybe referring to
the Epistle of Barnabas and Shepherd of Hermas,
that are stuck on at the end of the Sinaiticus?)
offered hope, as a new occultic-friendly Bible,
"of importance to students of occultism."
Those are Halls' words, not mine." 5. There were two goals.
One was to condition people's minds, like the Nazis,
over five generations. Those born post-9/11
are Generation Four. 6. Goal Number Two
was to pry the people's jot-and-tittle Bible-trusting hands
away from the King James Bible. And the Sinaiticus was
the Occult world's answer to that problem for them.
Are you saying that trusting the Sinaiticus,
and the Bibles derived from the Sinaiticus,
is a step toward occultic and New World Order thinking?
That's what this occultist said, not me.
I'm just putting it all together.
So if you trust the King James Bible
as God's preserved words in English, guess what?
By Hall's standards, YOU are "intolerant"
and a hindrance to One World Government.
Each Bible that is made from or trusts the Sinaiticus,
is not "just another Bible." It is the doorway
to losing trust in the King James, and being open and tolerant
toward the New World Order. At least, that's what a top occultist
who communed with world leaders said.
You can't hide from this. This is the elephant
in the living room. You can't avoid it.
Do you want to be a part of the New World Order?
Then don't trust your King James Bible.
There must be some pretty spiritual things in the KJV,
to get occultists and NWO people so riled up.
If for no other reason, that's a huge motivation
to get a King James, pray to God for understanding,
and put my trust in its holy words.
Look. Do what you want. For over 17 years,
that's what I've done. And despite all my years
of training and study, I have never regretted that decision.
Please take this decision seriously. Take your time. Think about it.
It is bigger than you can imagine.
God bless you, and have a wonderful day.