the united states court has ruled biggest of the f_c_c_
on the issue of net neutrality
now this this colossal e import
at comcast says look it we lay the cables that go into your internet
who is ted stevens a former republican uh... senator from alaska
uh... series of pool
rooms that go into the internets
if they lay the cables they say what we should be able to charge
what we want
so if someone's a comparative comcast
well that may wind up charging them a little bit more for their cable usage
uh... that leads to the internet there
also we would have been in it
uh... if their but it is a contest product will we look at that asker cost
less
and but that's just the tip of the iceberg
make a separate somewhat of a of a light daylight they don't like some kind
content they don't like people that speak against comcast
or other corporations or if they buy n_b_c_
competitors of n_b_c_
well then they could make their charges go out
and the sizes comcast but a_t_t_ rise in the center
if we lose on that neutrality
that means the borg comes online
that i thought about the poor all the time
about how they buy corporate america and multinational corporations down
grow and grow an obviously since logical but they don't make more money if the by
government officials there by government facials
then they go into the courts and eventually find a way to buy the
justices we talk about that yesterday on the show and here we are now it you know
you guys his court ruling that yes in fact the workin invaded internet
once they do that
and i think they'd be
that complete control over the corporate media right now old media the networks
uh... print et cetera not altered a lot of print
so navigate controlled online and all the sudden you want to get your message
out online
well comcast serve a rise in our a_t_t_ decided
mail like your message
they charge you help a lot more to get that message out
all the sudden
this wonderful dream of the internet being the great equalizer is flushed
down the toilet
and so today was
a bad ruling now
and a cassette terrible precedent
the question is what is the old bombing restriction to do about this
they could be one of two things
they can say hey you know ridiculous when you go to a higher court and hope
to uh... with and goes all the way the supreme court as car supreme court is
not conservative corporates
it real concern was william rehnquist you might not of like that
but he warned about corporate america impinging upon the still writes of the
state he said quote corporations are human beings they don't have first
amendment rights well they got rid of william michael l
dot to be for traffic
but once he left the replace some of the real conservative
they replace it with a corporate john roberts
and john roberts says what what would you like to do kasa corporations yes so
in citizens united what he did was he said you can spend as much as you like
if your corporation un-american
elections if this a case kids all we have to jump roberts lead core what are
they had built
thing as an awfully tough course they had
go ahead blockage charge more do whatever you want
you guys went i'd be shocked if they did
here's what i have seen she can do without the court's there is the court
ruled against them is because they said well this is an area of light regulation
efficiency
you know mandated by congress
uh... to
do real regulation
of internet like they were broadcast signal for the world and under
deregulation raga sandhya has me
but the alteration
uh... but if it if the past that law then f_c_c_ could definitely i wouldn't
say no equality uh... and you cannot charge more to your competitors or to
anyone else you to give everyone the right to be on the internet
just as they are now
should go bomb initiation do that
uh it
decision do that you'll have to protect that neutrality at all costs
if we can if we lose the internet
were all in a world of trouble
but then there are no outlets left
and the board rats
won't let them win on this one
it is very bad news
but it can be fought
if two people in power care to fight