(upbeat music)
- Hello everyone and welcome back to English with Lucy.
Today I am going to talk to you about
five strict English grammar rules
that natives don't always follow.
Yes, that's right.
Your teacher may have been lying to you.
Quickly before we get started, I would just like to thank
the sponsor of today's video it is italki.
And if you haven't heard of italki before,
it's a huge online database of both
native and nonnative teachers
who give one-to-one video lessons 24 hours a day,
seven days a week.
You can learn English and over 130 other languages
from anywhere in the world, anytime as long as you have
a stable internet connection.
It's an incredibly affordable way of learning a language,
much cheaper than an offline tutor or a language academy.
So many of my students message me
and ask me how they can meet and talk to native speakers.
Well, italki is a really good option
because not only do they have qualified teachers,
they also have community teachers who will practise
conversation with you.
They've given me a special offer to pass onto you.
You can get $10 worth of italki credits
in your student wallet, 48 hours after making
your first purchase of any amount,
or you've got to do is click on the link
in the description box and sign up.
Right, let's get started with the lesson.
All right, let's start with the first rule of English.
There are no rules.
(laughs)
That's just a joke.
There are many rules,
but we don't follow all of them
and that is what this video is about.
I just thought that was a lovely example
of how confusing language is.
Let's be serious.
Now, the first rule that we like to break
and the rule that doesn't always apply,
many teachers will tell you that you should never
ever end a sentence with a preposition.
Well, I'm about to prove your teacher's wrong.
There are quite a few situations in which you can end
a sentence with a preposition.
Now, if you can remove the preposition
from the end of a sentence without it changing the meaning
of the sentence, then you should do that.
But what about situations in which the meaning has changed?
Oh, let's talk about phrasal verbs.
These other verbs made of a verb
and at least one preposition.
Keep up, run down, get up,
put on, often sentences that use phrasal verbs,
end with a preposition.
For example, I think you should get up.
Or I hope you can come over.
Both of these sentences end with a preposition
and it can't be avoided.
If we remove the preposition,
the meaning will change and we can't really
rearrange it to avoid the preposition being put at the end.
Sometimes it's even okay to end a sentence
with a preposition
even if you aren't using a phrasal verb,
you might be able to rewrite these sentences
to avoid them ending with a preposition,
but it's not always necessary.
You might be over complicating things.
An example, does anyone know where he came from?
I could rewrite the sentence to say,
does anyone know from where he came?
But it would sound so unbelievably old fashioned.
Does anyone know where he came from?
Is perfectly fine.
Right, rule number two, the rule I want to debunk,
(chackles)
you should always say someone and I,
not someone and me.
This one is close to my heart
because I had it drummed into me when I was at school
both by my teachers and my mother,
and my teachers and my mother were misinformed at school.
Let's take a look at four sentences all regarding the zoo.
Lucy and I went to the zoo with Tom.
Lucy and me went to the zoo with Tom.
Tom went to the zoo with Lucy and I.
And Tom went to the zoo with Lucy and me.
Two of these sentences are incorrect
and two of them are correct.
The question of whether to use I or me,
it comes down to whether you're using the word as a subject
or an object in the sentence.
Both words are pronouns,
but I as a subject pronoun
and me is an object pronoun.
Native speakers, you can be forgiven
for getting confused with this.
I never learned this at school,
so after the first two,
Lucy and I went to the zoo with Tom,
it would be correct
because I is the subject of the sentence.
You can work this out by removing the extra bit,
the Lucy and bit does it work on its own?
I went to the zoo with Tom,
or me went to the zoo with Tom.
Well, me went, sounds very, very wrong.
So it's, I went.
However, in the second two sentences
it is the opposite.
Remove Lucy and again, in the second two sentences,
Tom went to the zoo with I, sounds weird.
So it's Tom went to the zoo with me.
Tom went to the zoo with Lucy and me.
In this case me is the object of the sentence.
So many native speakers
will always be taught to say someone and I,
when actually in many cases, someone
and me is the correct version.
Number three, a big rule that came up recently after
I used one of these in a title of my videos,
it is that you should never split an infinitive.
Many teachers will tell you this
because they are simplifying things a little bit,
but in reality we do split infinitives.
So infinitives are the two word forms of verbs like to run,
to laugh, to play.
When you split an infinitive,
you put something normally an adverb
between those two words,
for example, to quickly run, to carefully read,
to playfully dance.
So often it's a case of it just sounding better
when we split an infinitive,
it sounds more natural.
For example, I'm going to quickly run to the shop.
This sounds better than
I'm going to run to the shop quickly.
But in some more complex cases,
moving the adverb can actually change the meaning
of the sentence.
Take a look at this sentence.
I'm going to really kiss him when I see him.
If I say I'm going to really kiss someone,
it means that it's going to be quite a kiss, a big kiss,
a very strong one.
If I say, I am really going to kiss him when I see him,
rather than talking about the strength of the kiss,
I'm almost conveying a sense of determination.
It's only a slight difference,
but it does change the meaning.
Now, some sentences actually require a split infinitive,
which makes it all the more bananas
that teachers tell you to never split an infinitive.
Let's go straight in with an example.
He expects the staff numbers to more than triple
over the next five years.
You can't move more than in this sentence.
You can't put it in another place
whilst retaining the meaning.
This sentence requires a split infinitive.
Number four is,
we should always use there are instead of there is
before a plural.
So many teachers will tell you always use
there is then a singular and there are then a plural,
this doesn't always apply.
People get very upset about it.
In the comment section, if I use there is
before what they consider to be a plural,
I'm going to explain that use
but I would admit many native speakers, myself included,
do make mistakes and get confused
with there is and there are,
because we speak so quickly that we don't give ourselves
time to plan whether there is is needed
or there are is needed.
So just to cover the basics we use there is, and there are,
when we first refer to the presence or existence
of someone or something.
There is and also there's are both singular forms.
There's is the reduction of there is.
There is, there's.
There's is most commonly used in informal speaking.
So instead of saying it is a fly on my head, (laughs)
we would say there's or there is a fly on my head.
There are is the plural form of there is and there's.
An example, there are two spots on my face.
Now in speaking and in some informal writing,
we sometimes use there's when it refers
to more than one thing.
Bear in mind that this use can be considered
incorrect in examinations.
It's not uncommon to hear native speakers make this mistake.
I might say there's many cakes instead of,
there are many cakes because I'm just so used to saying
there's all the time.
There's one apple, there's two apples.
It feels almost natural to me.
Now this is considered to be incorrect.
However, there are actually some situations in which
it is considered to be it correct to use there's
then a plural.
Let's have a look at collecting phrases.
One in particular is a number of, a number of,
would I say there is a number of cakes for sale.
There's a number of cakes for sale,
or there are a number of cakes for sale.
Well it's actually really difficult to work out.
In a construction like this
the verb is being pulled to there, number, and cakes
all at once.
You can work out whether you should use
there is or there are in this situation
by focusing on emphasis.
Use is if you want to emphasise the group as a whole,
there is a number of, the group cakes
or use are if you want to emphasise the individual
members of that group,
each individual cake,
there are a number of individual cakes.
This works with a number of, (laughs)
collecting phrases like a variety of,
there is a variety of drinks at the bar.
Or there are a variety of drinks at the bar.
Both work depending on what you want to emphasise.
Now we do use there are when talking about a lot of,
and this is a mistake that a lot of native speakers make,
myself included.
Again, we shouldn't say there's a lot of people
in the room.
We should say there are a lot of people in the room.
But you will hear this mistake made.
Now with the phrase, there is two dogs, ever be correct.
Well, sort of if two dogs were included as part of a list,
sometimes there are just sounds wrong.
I wouldn't say there are a cat,
two dogs and a cow on the farm.
I would say there is a cat,
two dogs and a cow on the farm.
So that is a clear example of there is
used before a singular
but a singular formed as part of a list.
Some grammar lovers (laughs)
will still insist that this is incorrect
but I'm not with them on this one.
It just sounds wrong.
If you are ever in doubt, you can actually
rewrite the sentence to avoid using there is
and there are.
And the last rule number five,
you should always say if I were
rather than if I was.
Now, you will hear a lot of people making a mistake
with if I were and if I was,
they will say if I was when they are meant to say if I were,
however again, I was brought up to always say if I were,
when actually in some situations
if I was is correct and if I were is incorrect.
Shocker!
Now this grammar rule might seem a little bit complicated
at first, but actually it's not.
There is a simple trick that you can use to remember
and you will always get it right.
You use the phrase, if I were
when using the subjunctive mood,
this is used to talk about hypothetical situations.
For example, if I were richer, I would buy a Tesla.
True story, I would.
I really would like an electric car,
but I need one that will go over farmland.
Anyway, if I were richer, I would buy a Tesla.
I am imagining a situation in which I am richer,
a hypothetical situation and I'm imagining
what I would do in that situation,
what that would mean for that version of myself.
Now we use the phrase, if I was,
if we are referring to something that did actually happen,
so we have, if I were hypothetical,
if I was actually happened reality,
so we often use it for reminiscing.
An example, if I was late for registration
when I was at school,
it was because my bus didn't arrive.
This isn't the most commonly used phrase on earth,
but it's important to know that sometimes
if I was is correct.
Right, that's it for today's lesson.
I hope you enjoyed it.
I hope you learned something.
I really enjoyed doing the research for this video.
It was a quite surprising to see
how much misinformation was spread around my primary,
middle and upper schools.
(laughs)
Don't forget to check out italki you can get $10 worth
of italki credits for free in your student wallet
48 hours after making your first purchase of any amount,
or you've got to do is click on the link
in the description box to sign up.
Don't forget to connect with me on all of my social media.
I've got my Facebook,
my Instagram, my Twitter,
and my personal channel, Lucy Bella Earl.
I will see you soon for another lesson.
(smacks)
(upbeat music)