CONCENTRATE ON GETTING OUT THE
VOTE.
>> Sandra: LIVE ON THE HILL
FOR US, THANK YOU.
PETE HEGSETH NOW, COHOST OF
FOX & FRIENDS WE CAN AND AUTHOR
OF THE NEW BOOK "BATTLE FOR THE
AMERICAN LIFE" NUMBER ONE ON
"THE NEW YORK TIMES" BEST SELLER
LIST.
CONGRATS TO YOU.
WELCOME.
WE ARE SEEING SOME OF THOSE
TARGETED OVER THE WEEKEND WITH
VIOLENCE AS A RESULT OF THE
OVERTURNING OF ROE V. WADE, YOUR
THOUGHTS THIS MORNING, PETE?
>> WE SHOULD EXPECT THAT GIVEN
WHAT HAPPENED IN BETWEEN THE
LEAK OF THE DRAFT OPINION TO
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND THE
ACTUAL DECISION ITSELF.
MOB VIOLENCE AND THE THREAT
THEREOF IS A TACTIC USED BY THE
MODERN LEFT.
IT’S NOT NEW NECESSARILY TO
TODAY, BUT THEY WANT THEIR WAY
REGARDLESS OF HOW OUR SYSTEM
WORKS.
THIS RULING WAS AN ABSOLUTE
VALIDATION OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL
REPUBLIC SYSTEM.
DO YOU SEE, THEY YELL ABOUT
DEMOCRACY ALL THE TIME, IT’S
ALWAYS THE WORD DEMOCRACY AND
THE USE THAT AS A COVER WORD FOR
EVERYTHING COMING AT THE IRONY
OF THIS DECISION IS THAT IN MOST
OF THE PLACES AS YOU POINTED OUT
WHERE THESE RIOTS AND PROTESTS
ARE HAPPENING, ABORTION ON
DEMAND WILL STILL BE ILLEGAL IN
THOSE STATES, ALL THIS DECISION
DOES IS GIVES THE DECISION BACK
TO THE PEOPLE IN THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVE TO MAKE THAT
DECISION THEMSELVES AS OPPOSED
TO NINE UNELECTED JUDGES
DICTATING THE LAW OF THE LAND.
SO WE EXPECT THESE TYPES OF
INTIMIDATION AND HEATED
RHETORIC, BUT FOR ME, I SIT BACK
AND SAY, YOU KNOW, GOD BLESS OUR
SYSTEM AND THE WISDOM OF OUR
FOUNDERS WHO MADE SURE THAT IT
WASN’T THE TYRANNY OF THE
MAJORITY THAT WOULD DECIDE WHERE
OUR RIGHTS COME FROM AND WHAT IS
A LIFE.
INSTEAD, OUR CONSTITUTION
VALIDATED OUR SYSTEM AND WE GOT
A GREAT OPINION.
I’M JUST ANOTHER ONE FOR
COACH KENNEDY.
IT’S A WONDERFUL THING TO SEE.
>> GREAT WITH HIS REACTION JUST
A MOMENT AGO, WATCHING THE
SUNDAY SHOW OVER THE WEEKEND,
MARTHA MacCALLUM HOSTING
"FOX NEWS SUNDAY" AND SHE
PRESSED STACEY ABRAMS ON HER
PRO-ABORTION STANCE.
HERE IS THAT MOMENT.
WATCH.
>> DO YOU BELIEVE ALL THE WAY UP
TO NINE MONTHS, YOUR TALK ABOUT
CARING ABOUT THE LIVES OF WOMEN,
I’M ASKING AT WHAT POINT DO YOU
CARE ABOUT THE LIFE OF THAT
BABY?
>> WHAT I WOULD SAY IS THAT IT
IS A MEDICAL DECISION.
I DON’T KNOW OF A SINGLE WOMAN
WHO REACHES THIS STAGE WHERE
THIS DECISION IS EASY.
>> I WILL TAKE THAT UP TO NINE
MONTHS IN SOME CASES DEPENDING
ON THE WOMAN, CORRECT?
>> THAT IS NOT WHAT I SAID.
I SAID THIS IS A MEDICAL
DECISION, AND THE MEDICAL
DECISIONS THAT HAVE TO BE MADE
HAVE TO BE MADE IN CONTEXT.
>> Sandra: YOUR REACTION TO
THAT?
>> BROUGHT ABOUT A
MARTHA MacCALLUM, AND ANY TIME
A HOST GETS A CHANCE TO
INTERVIEW A DEMOCRAT ABOUT THEIR
STANCE ON ABORTION, THAT IS
PRECISELY THE LINE OF
QUESTIONING YOU SHOULD TAKE.
ADD 12 POINTS, ALL THE WAY UP TO
NINE MONTHS WOULD YOU SAY THAT
THE LIFE OF THAT CHILD SHOULD BE
FACTORED IN?
AND THESE DEMOCRATS TIME AND
TIME AGAIN, STACEY ABRAMS THE
MOST RECENT DEMONSTRATE AND
REVEAL THEMSELVES FOR THE
EXTREMISTS ON THE ISSUE THAT
THEY ARE.
IT’S ONLY COUNTRIES LIKE
COMMUNIST CHINESE IN NORTH KOREA
THAT HAVE ABORTION ON DEMAND
POLICIES EFFECTIVELY.
WE DID A SEGMENT ON
"FOX & FRIENDS" YOU LOOK ACROSS
EUROPE AND IN MOST SEQUESTERED
NATIONS, THE DECISION WAS 15
WEEKS, MOST OF THEM ARE AT 12 OR
13 OR 14 AND HAVE BEEN FOR QUITE
SOME TIME.
OUR POLICY FOR 50 YEARS HAS BEEN
EXTREME.
THEY ARE EVEN MORE EXTREME, THEY
WENT FROM STAVE THAT MAKE SAFE,
LEGAL, RARE TO ABORTION ON
DEMAND.
GOOD FOR HER, THAT’S EXACTLY WHO
THEY ARE, AND THEY WILL CONTINUE
THAT RHETORIC WHICH IS WAY OUT
OF STEP WITH THEIR VOTERS.
>> Sandra: IN THE WAKE OF THE
BIG DECISION ON FRIDAY,
DEMOCRATS HAVE REMOVED THEIR
CALL TO PACK THE SUPREME COURT.
THE WHITE HOUSE JUST YESTERDAY
FINALLY CONFIRMING THAT THE
PRESIDENT HAS NOT CHANGED HIS
POSITION AND IS STILL OPPOSED TO
EXPANDING THE COURTS.
AND KEEP IN THE COURT WOULD
CURRENTLY PRESERVE, AND TO
PASSING THE OTHER PARTY WITH THE
MAJORITY WOULD RETALIATE BY
TRYING TO PACK THE COURT AGAIN.
AND THE INDEPENDENT OF THE COURT
AND THE RULE OF LAW ITSELF.
NINE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HAVE
DONE WELL IN 1869, BUT I
"NEW YORK TIMES" OP ED HAS THIS
CASE IN THIS HEADLINE.
HOW TO LOOK AT A SUPREME COURT.
AND AS A PUSH TO IMPEACH
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.
DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSWOMAN IS ON
BOARD.
>> IF WE ALLOW SUPREME COURT
NOMINEES TO LIE UNDER OATH AND
SECURE LIFETIME APPOINTMENTS TO
THE HIGHEST COURT OF THE LAND
AND THEN ISSUE, ISSUE WITHOUT
BASIS THERE MUST BE CONSEQUENCES
FOR SUCH A DEEPLY DESTABILIZING
ACTION AND HOSTILE TAKEOVER OF
OUR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS.
>> Sandra: MUST BE
CONSEQUENCES FOR LYING
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES WHEN
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF
THAT THAT WAS THE CASE.
>> NO, GO BACK AND CHECK THE
TAPE OF HOW AMY CONEY BARRETT
AND JUSTICE KAVANAUGH AND
NEIL GORSUCH ANSWER THE QUESTION
OF ROE V. WADE, DID WHAT
JUSTICES FOR DECADES HAVE DONE
AND NOT GOING TO GIVE AWAY HOW
THEY WOULD ROLL ON OUR
PARTICULAR CASE PENDING BEFORE
THE COURTS.
THEY CAN TALK ABOUT THE
PRINCIPLES.
THEY CAN TALK ABOUT A PRECEDENT,
AND THEY DID, BUT THEY NEVER
DEFINITIVELY SAID ONE THING ONE
WAY OR ANOTHER, THIS IS
SILLINESS IN JUVENILE STUFF FROM
COMRADE CORTEZ, THE SOCIALIST,
BUT IT DOES WHERE REPRESENT A
DEEP SEED OF THINKING THAT
BELIEVES THAT IF THEY DON’T GET
THEIR WAY, OUR SYSTEM SHOULD BE
TORN DOWN.
AND INSTEAD, OUR SYSTEM HAS
VALIDATED ITSELF.
IT’S EASY TO DEFEND AGAINST
THIS, AND THANKFULLY JOE BIDEN
HAS FOUND ONE ISSUE, JUST ONE
WHERE HE IS WILLING TO TAKE ON
THE HARD LEFT OF HIS PARTY AND
SAY, HEY, GUYS, THAT’S BONKERS.
>> Sandra: SUPREME COURT
SOURCES ON FRIDAY MAKING IT VERY
CLEAR THAT THIS WAS JUST A
MINUTE’S UNDERSTANDING OF THE
WORD PRECEDENT AND WHAT IT
ACTUALLY MEANS TO YOUR POINT
ABOUT THOSE JUSTICES IN THE WAY
THAT THEY VIEWED THIS AS
PRECEDENT FOR THE LAW OF THE
LAND FOR THOSE 60 YEARS DOES NOT
MEAN THAT THAT LAW CANNOT CHANGE
WAS THE POINT THAT MANY WERE
MAKING.
AND "THE WALL STREET JOURNAL"
EDITORIAL BOARD MAKING THAT TO
POINT THIS MORNING.
MSNBC HOST MEANWHILE PRESSING
THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR HONOR
CALLS TO DEFY THE SUPREME COURT,
LISTEN TO THIS.
>> BE PREPARED TO LIVE IN
DEFIANCE OF THESE SIX PEOPLE WHO
THINK THAT THEY HAVE THE RIGHT
TO TELL YOU WHAT YOU CAN DO.
>> ARE YOU TELLING PEOPLE TO
BREAK THE LAW?
>> NO, I AM TELLING PEOPLE THAT
THEY CAN ACCESS UNDER CALIFORNIA
LAW THEIR RIGHTS THAT WERE
PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
THAT IS GOING TO BE HELD AND
DEFIANCE IN SOME STATES.
THEN I WOULD SAY COMING AT,
PREPARE TO DEFY.
>> Sandra: I’M NOT SURE HOW
YOU REACT TO THAT, BUT WE HEARD
MANY CALLS LIKE THAT IN THE WAKE
OF THIS, MAXINE WATERS SAID THIS
ON THE SUPREMES COURT STEPS
FRIDAY AS WELL.
>> THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE ALREADY
DOING WHEN IT COMES TO THINGS
LIKE SAFE SANCTUARY CITIES WHERE
THEY DON’T ENFORCE IMMIGRATION
LAW, OR DAs IN THESE LIBERAL
CITIES WHERE THEY REFUSE TO
ENFORCE THE LAW THEMSELVES.
THEY GAINED THE POSITIONS AND
IGNORE THE ACTUAL RULINGS FROM
THE SUPREME COURT OR THE LAW OF
THE LAND.
SO THAT DOES NOT SURPRISE ME,
HERE’S THE IRONY IN THE SAD PART
OF IT IS THAT CALIFORNIA HAS
GOING TO PROBABLY INCREASE THE
AMOUNT OF ABORTIONS A
PERFORMANCE.
IT’S NOT ILLEGAL IN CALIFORNIA.
THERE IS NOTHING TO DEFY.
IT SIMPLY SENDS IT BACK TO THE
STATES WHERE ABORTION ON DEMAND
IS ALREADY THE UNFORTUNATE
REALITY IN CALIFORNIA.
AGAIN, LIKE CLIMATE CHANGE, THE
POLITICS OF ABORTION ARE SO
CENTRAL TO THE LOBBY ON THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY, THEY HAVE TO SAY
THESE TYPES OF THINGS AND THEY
DO BELIEVE THEM IN MANY CASES
AND UNFORTUNATELY IF YOU LIVE IN
CALIFORNIA, THAT IS THE REALITY.