TANZANIA.
>>.
>> .
>> WE’VE SAID WE DO NOT OR TWO
TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE WE’VE SAID
THAT WE EXPECT TO NEEDS TO BE
RESOLVED BY PEACEFUL MEANS.
>> WELL THAT WAS NATIONAL
SECURITY COUNCIL JOHN KIRBY
AHEAD OF NANCY PELOSI’S INVEST
TO TAIWAN TONIGHT AS A RESULT,
CHINA SABER RATTLELING THREATS
TO THE UNITED STATES JOINING
ME NEW JERSEY CONGRESSMAN JEFF
VAN DREW MEMBERS OF THE
HOMELAND SECURITY,
INFRASTRUCTURE CHE I WANT YOUR
REACTION TO WHAT WE’RE HEARING
FROM WHITE HOUSE CHINA DECIDES
TO THREATEN NANCY PELOSI
SUGGEST THEY COULD TAKE PLANE
DOWN IF SHE GOES TO TAIWAN
SAYING U.S. IS GOING TO PAY A
HEAVY PRICE IF WE VISIT TAIWAN
THEN WE’VE GOT STATE
DEPARTMENT SAYING THAT WE
DON’T SUPPORTER TAIWAN
INDEPENDENCE, YOUR THOUGHTS.
>> WELL, THREE DIFFERENT
STORIES COMING OUT OF STATE
DEPARTMENT AND THE
ADMINISTRATION.
THEY SUPPORT THEM KIND OF
SUPPORT OF THEM THEY DON’T
SUPPORT THEM I DON’T GET IT I
MEAN ALWAYS HAD A RELATIONSHIP
WITH TAIWAN.
WE DO HAVE A RELATIONSHIP WITH
TAIWAN.
AND THAT NEEDS TO CONTINUE FOR
STRATEGIC, AND ECONOMIC
REASONS.
OBVIOUSLY, SO LET’S -- LET
THEM TRY SOMETHING DIFFERENT
FOR A CHANGE, TELL THE TRUTH
TELL HOW IT REALLY IS, NANCY
PELOSI, SHE HAS A RIGHT TO GO
OVER THERE, OF COURSE, THE
SPEAKER HOW MUCH GOOD THAT IS
GOING TO DO IS A WHOLE
DIFFERENT QUESTION I THINK
MORE HARM THAN GOOD.
FRANKLY SOMETHING THAT ISN’T
NECESSARY, ESPECIALLY ON HER
PART I THINK I HAD MAY BE MORE
PERSONAL THAN ACTUALLY
GOVERNMENTALAL.
>> WE WILL SEE SO MUCH FOR
AMBIGUITY, VERY CLEAR WE DON’T
SUPPORT TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE,
NOW, THE -- THE CHINESE
COMMUNIST PARTY, WARNING A O
DANGEROUS EBB CONSEQUENCES
YOUR MAKE ON ISSUES KYRSTEN
SINEMA HAS YET TO SAY IF GOING
TO SUPPORT THE DEMOCRATS
MASSIVE SPENDING BY MANY
WAITING TILL PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW IS DONE MUST HAVE BEEN
REVIEW IS DONE MUST HAVE BEEN
WORKING ON THIS FOR A LONG
TIME HAD IT ALREADY FOR
PARLIAMENT.
>> WILL THE DEMOCRATS RUN INTO
TROUBLE HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT
GETTING THE SALT DEDUCTION
BACK IN THERE.
I THINK THEY WILL RUN INTO
PROBLEMS, WHETHERS YOUO WANT
PRODUCTION OR NOT WHEN YOU
THINK UNFAIR TO SOME OF THE
EASTERN STATES, AND COASTAL
STATES THE BOTTOM LINE IS
THERE IS GOING TO BE SO MANY
OTHER BAD THINGS IN THE BILL,
LET’S UNDERSTAND SOMETHING
ABOUT THE BILL, THIS IS NOT AN
INFLATION REDUCEER THIS IS
INFLATION TAXATION
LEGISLATION, WHAT THEY ARE
TYPICALLY DO INCREASING, TAXES
GOING TO INCREASE INFLATION,
INCREASE SPENDING YOU KNOW
THAT IS THE RESULT THAT IS
COMING DOWN THE PIKE FOR US
THAT IS IS WHAT IS GOING TO
HAPPEN KYRSTEN SINEMA DID
RIGHT THING WOULDN’T VOTE FOR
THIS THING PERIOD, THE -- WE
SHOULD NOT, FRANKLY VICTIM
DISAPPOINTED IN JOE MANCHIN.
YOU KNOW I DO O HOPE HE GETS
HIS -- BECAUSE THERE IS NO
OTHER REASON TO VOTE FOR THIS
BILL, THIS IS JUST A MODIFIED
VERSION OF THE GREEN NEW DEAL,
EVERYTHING YOU DON’T NEED
DON’T WANT RIGHT NOW.
AND THEY MOVING FORWARD WITH
IT THEY JUST CAN’T STOP
THEMSELVES.
MARIA: WELL, I I MEAN
CONGRESSMAN, JERRY BAKER CALLS
IT IN THE "THE WALL STREET
JOURNAL," IN OP-ED, HE SAID
INFLATION REDUCTION ACT IS
INSULT TO USED CAR SALESMEN,
OKAY?
BECAUSE OF -- THE REDUCTION
ACT, MEANWHILE, IT IS MORE
SPENDING LIKELY GOING TO STOKE
INFLATION, SO, I GUESS YOU
KNOW MY QUESTION TO YOU IS
WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF ALL
THESE TAX INCREASES WE SPOKE
WITH O GROVER NORQUIST EARLIER
SAID THIS PLAN IS GOING TO
RAISE EVERYBODY’S TAXES, WHICH
IS WHY STATES LIKE YOURS AND
NEW YORK WANT REST OF THE
COUNTRY, TO -- TO BASICALLY
SUBSIDIZE, AND REINSERT THE
SALT DEDUCTION.
>> WELL IF WE RAN OUR STATES
RIGHT WE WOULDN’T HAVE TO
WORRY ABOUT THIS WOULDN’T EVEN
HORRENDOUS PROPERTY TAXES,
INCOME TAXES, AND OTHER COSTS
THAT WE DO IN THE STATE THE
BUDGET IN NEW JERSEY WAS A
RECORD HIGH YOU BUDGET WAY OFF
TRACKS, SO, HE IS RIGHT.
HE IS RIGHT.
AND WE SHOULD BE CONCERNED
AGAIN THAT IS WHY, I CALL IT,
BUT, YOU KNOW, INFLATION
TAXATION LEGISLATION BECAUSE
THAT IS WHAT IT IS YOU KNOW
WHAT IS AMAZING ABOUT THIS
MAJORITY?
ON THE OTHER SIDE, THIS
PRESIDENT THIS MAJORITY --
AMONG THE SHARKS CAN’T HELM
MYSELF, WHAT IS AMAZING
WHATEVER THEY CALL SOMETHING,
MARIA, YOU CAN BE SURE
DIAMETRICALLY THE OPPOSITE NOT
WHAT THEY CALL IT.
WHEN THEY HAVE THAT BILL TO
PUT MORE, MORE FOOD ON THE
SHELVE THAT THEY WOULD
INCREASE AMOUNT OF FORMULA
WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR ON THE
SHELVES IT ACTUALLY O GOOD
THING GETTING MORE FORMULA ON
THE SHELVES, LOOK AT THE BILL
DIDN’T GET ONE BOTTLE OF
FORMULA ON ANY SHELVE ANYWHERE
IN THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, ALL IT DID WAS HIRE
MORE PHONIES PEOPLE POSITIVE
WORK FOR FDA WHATEVER THEY
CALL IT KNOW IN YOUR MIND IT
IS THE ON SIFT.
>> JERRY BAKER WRITES IT
REDUCES DEFICIT BY 00 BILLION
DOLLARS EVERY 10 YEARS
REPRESENT INFLATION REDUCTION
WHAT DO WE MAKE OF THE LAW
CONGRESS PASSED LAST YEAR THAT
INCREASED DEFICIT BY ESTIMATED
1.7 TRILLION DOLLARS, IN LESS
THAN TWO YEARS, WRITES JERRY
BAKER IN HAVE JOURNAL GREAT