well in a ruling that as a program spying on all Americans
sorry unconstitutional are US sister judgeship
Richard Leon saying sorry
your program clearly violates the Fourth Amendment for small
I he says I cannot imagine a more indiscriminate
and arbitrary invasion then this systematic and high-tech collection
and retention a personal data on virtually every single citizen
for purposes of acquiring it and allies in with
out judicial approval the judge
is absolutely right about that as well women said from day one know it's under
sink
the guy who brought this lawsuit is actually a a total man meant his name is
Larry claim in
you brought along with Charles strange don't know much about Charles
you know his name is strange Larry claim is far stranger
he's a if for a respected conservative
he's the founder and former chairman of Judicial Watch V which you might have
heard over in the news
and he's also you sorta Freedom Watch
these are groups that are supposed to be watching out to see how liberal media's
I I don't worry is really really liberal okay
up less on all he believed he was soon as mom for fifty thousand not
K and then threaten to sue people for revealing it
because the clinton administration had leaked that of course if they care a lot
about you larry
he do to reclaim America rally where they were gonna
but rally pro bombers impeachment he said millions we shop in DC
less than a hundred K I N
he told Obama won score put the koran down and come with your hands up
okay at the white house now how nonetheless I
tell you that because he's actually right in this case and that's why I love
about our democracy
you have to agree with people they could be crazy right-wing or you could think
I'm crazy left-wing
I don't care nobody cares about that if you've got a functioning democracy
as long as we all recognize what the Constitution
actually says invite towards it and their times
when right-wingers and left-wingers or actually for
for more adhering to the Constitution the so-called
establishment the bipartisan agreement to usually screw us
so are let me read you the party Constitution its role in your support
the moment
and that's what the judge of course bases decision on and it says
the right of the people to be secure in their persons houses papers and effects
against
unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated
okay well I V see you know secure in their persons houses papers and effects
I without a court order if they're going in get not getting a court order in
finding out where your
papers are they're finding out who you called when you called how long the call
took et cetera right so it's clearly the right decision by the judge
and then finally this is really important he said
that in the entire proceedings and he had a 68 page
ruling here filled with footnotes this era right and by the judge also
appointed by George W Bush it and soda it doesn't matter if you're right or
left if you actually read the Constitution right
and we can all agree on the core principles because we should all be
americans on this
of course almost it's the big business and big government have colluded
to take away our rights right it's big business that cooperates and say all UAE
out to private contractors I'll do that for you no problem
and big government can't wait to intrude upon your lives
but he said that during the entire proceedings the government
the inside a single instance in which the program quote actually stopped
and imminent terrorist attack not
warm instance could they show
that this program actually stopped many attacks it did violate the privacy
rights of $300 million Americans
but never stop the terrorist attack and I should be the most important thing
now this is not the end all be all yes he's a federal level judge
and he is but he's also actually even stayed his own
a ruling because this can of course be appealed by the government
and he says of course a big national security issue so
this ruling will only going to affect after the appeal is heard
and then it could go all the way up to the Supreme Court of course but this is
the first step
and it's a great step where we have a judge saying what
obviously this violates the fourth amendment to the Constitution
and with the NSA's doing is just like the critics on the left and the right
said and by the way in the middle as well not washington's middle but in the
country's middle
all said it was wrong and was unconstitutional