The Surprising Truth About Cousins and Marriage
In modern western society, marrying your cousin is not well accepted, particularly in the
United States.
Through a combination of old prejudices and present-day conventional wisdom about inherited
birth defects, first cousin marriage is seen by many as a little too close for comfort,
as well as a bad idea if you want children.
However, first cousin marriage is far more common, and far less dangerous, than many
of us have been led to believe, as you’ll soon see.
Further, if you include second cousins in the mix, according to the Clinical Genetics
Handbook, the increased risks with regards to having children are nearly non-existent
in this case compared with non-cousin marriage.
So where did the taboo against cousin marriage start?
While there have been instances of the banning of marriage between cousins at various points
through history, such as the Roman Catholics banning the practice for a time starting with
the Council of Agde in 506 AD, for the most part marriage among cousins has been popular
as long as people have been getting married.
In fact, it is estimated that as many as 80% of the marriages in human history have been
between first or second cousins.
This switch in cousin-marriage’s acceptance began in earnest in some parts of the Western
world in the mid-19th century.
Specifically, until the 1860s or so, first cousins commonly married in Europe and the
U.S.
In fact, Charles Darwin, Mr. Natural Selection himself, was married to his first cousin Emma
Wedgwood.
Nonetheless, the practice soon fell out of fashion in the United States.
Although never outlawed in England, during the second half of the 19th century, many
states began to ban marriages between first cousins, as part of a larger movement after
the Civil War for greater state involvement in a variety of areas, including education,
health and safety.
Researchers note that the distinction in marriage bans between England and the U.S. may be explained
by the fact that, in the United States, the practice “was associated not with the aristocracy
and upper middle class [Queen Victoria and Prince Albert were second cousins] but with
much easier targets: immigrants and the rural poor.”
Regardless, cousin marriage bans began popping up across the states, with the first in Kansas
in 1858.
Ohio, New Hampshire, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, Washington and Wyoming banned
the practice in the 1860s, and many more had enacted bans by the 1920s.
The most recent state to ban cousin marriage was Texas in 2005.
Today, first cousin marriage is only allowed without restriction in 19 states, and with
some restrictions in Arizona, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Utah, Wisconsin and North Carolina
(in North Carolina, while first cousins may marry, “double cousins” may not- more
on this one in a bit.)
The distinction lies in the debate about whether or not there is an increased risk that the
partners’ shared genes will produce an increased chance that their offspring will have recessive,
undesirable traits.
A recent report on births in a British-Pakistani community (where first cousin marriage is
very common) demonstrated that first cousin children there were twice as likely to be
born with “potentially life threatening birth defects” as compared with the children
of unrelated parents.
Advocates on the other side point out that this resulted in only a 6% chance for the
children in the study, as compared with a 3% chance for the population as a whole.
For your reference, this increase in birth defect rate is about the same as the increased
risk of a woman having a baby when she is 40 vs. when she is 30.
Proponents here point out that few would advocate banning a 40 year old woman from having children.
They also point to recent testing that placed the increased risk of spina bifida and cystic
fibrosis at only 1.7% to 2.8% higher than for children of unrelated parents.
Further, researchers point out that “the widely accepted scare stories – even within
academia – and the belief that cousin marriage is inevitably harmful have declined in the
face of some of the data we’ve been producing.”
It should also be noted that some of the children born with defects in the recent British study
may, in fact, have been double cousins (best explained by an example):
“If a girl and her sister . . . meet two brothers, they pair off . . and each couple
produces a baby . . . those kids [would be double cousins]”
A community nurse who works among the Pakistani community in the British study opined:
“A first cousin marries a first cousin and the couple’s own grandparents are cousins,
too.
I have heard of first-cousin marriages going back generation after generation in some families.”
This brings us to cross-cousins vs. parallel cousins.
In some societies, first cousin marriage is traditional and well-accepted, although many
make a distinction between “cross-cousins” and “parallel cousins.”
Cross cousins have parents who are siblings, but of the opposite sex.
The parents of parallel cousins are also siblings but are of the same sex.
In cultures where cross cousins are encouraged and parallel discouraged, it is often an inherited
taboo, passed down from when there was greater inter-marriage and inter-mingling among the
members of an extended family – with a greater chance that first cousins could also be half-siblings.
As noted in the book The Evolution of Sex, “Fathers who are also brothers may overtly
or covertly share sexual relations with the wife of one or the other . . . . Likewise,
mothers who are also sisters may overtly or covertly share sexual access to the husband
of one or the other, raising the possibility that apparent parallel cousins are actually
half-siblings, sired by the same father . . . .[With] cross cousins, because in the absence of full-sibling
incest, it is unlikely [they] . . . can share a father . . . [unless a] mother had a brother
whose wife was impregnated by [mother's husband].”
This is not very likely to happen in modern societies that practice first-cousin marriage.
In fact, in a number of countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Yemen and
in the Palestinian Territories, paternal parallel cousin marriage is the preferred form of consanguineous
marriage.
In the end, despite Western taboos today, globally, cousin marriages are still going
strong, with an estimated 10% of all marriages in the world being between cousins, and as
high as 50% in some regions of the world.
However, cousin marriage is making a comeback in the U.S., as well, as more and more studies
continue to debunk the overblown risks once commonly touted.
First cousins marrying in 21st century America discover that many states no longer regulate
the practice, despite perhaps having laws against it.
Likewise, most sects of Christianity do not forbid it, which would be hard to do given
cases like Isaac and Rebekah in the Book of Genesis.
For instance, the Methodist Church, has “no official position on marriage between cousins.”
Nonetheless, it’s not easy being in a first cousin marriage in some regions of the world.
As one man in such a relationship recently discussed, some members of the couple’s
immediate family no longer speak to them and have never met the couple’s children.
On top of that, he stated, “We don’t typically tell folks.
We told our daughters, “It’s not something to be ashamed of, but [don't] tell your friends
. . . people are fickle, and preteens and teens can be downright cruel.”
Bonus Fact: • Some famous individuals who married their
first cousins include: Albert Einstein (with his second wife Elsa), H.G. Wells (with Isabel
Mary Wells), Saddam Hussein (with Sajida Talfah), Christopher Robin Miln and his wife Leslie
(the former being of Winnie the Pooh fame), and Edgar Allen Poe with Virginia Clemm, among
many, many more.
A recent famous example of a second cousin marriage was between Rudy Giuliani and (his
now ex-wife) Regina Peruggi.