comments below and I'll try to answer it and if you like this
to be related to you the best bet is is to have a dozen kids
descendants alive today so in 1200 years if you want everyone
more closely related to Charlamagne than we are to
how you might be related to ancient people, put it in the
reported as living at the time. If you have any questions about
Julius Caesar because Julius Caesar doesn't have any
through the ages. So it looks like Julius Caesar's biological
video, give it a thumbs up and be sure to tell all your
related to Julius Caesar than we are to Charlamagne because
genetically we are statistically more likely to be
of the actual genealogy that we do have on both Julius Caesar
she died during childbirth and her son died a few days later.
So, there were no legitimate natural heirs of Julius Caesar,
just his adopted heirs. Now, Julius Caesar also had several
down these illegitimate children, I couldn't find any
a direct descendant of Julius Caesar. So even though
earth is going to be descended from Maria Bonita Olivera of
live to adulthood, was married, and had a son. Unfortunately,
Argentina who in 1989 had her 32nd child, all of whom were
related to him by a factor of six. Julius Caesar on the other
that we know of, we've increased our chances of being
descendants died with his grandson. No one alive today is
Besides his adopted children, Julius Caesar had two known
have then been able to propagate that line down
of him having any children of his own. Julia however, did
that Charlamagne had 11 children that reached adulthood
potential paths to Charlamagne or 187, 000 so because of the
generation, there's still about 30 million people in Europe but
level. But if we go down a generation to the 39th
I'm going to take a guess that in 4, 000 CE everyone on planet
and on Charlamagne we can confidently say that we are
looking at it let's go back and Charlamagne should show up on
known to have had at least 18 children 11 of whom reached
children of Charlamagne so instead of 33, 000 potential
our family tree because there's half as many people in our
paths to Charlamagne we actually have 11 times 17, 000
hand was not so prolific according to historians.
our family tree 33, 000 times at that fortieth generation
adulthood and there's probably a lot more children that he did
somebody who has no descendants it's impossible Charlamagne is
to genealogy because these two people provide a great lesson
suspected illegitimate children. But even as I tracked
since there are less people, lucky for us, that means you
evidence that they had children and grandchildren that would
killed when he was just 17 years old and there's no record
another eight and 50 years to Julius Caesar. There were fewer
natural children, Julia and Caesarean. Now, Caesarian was
family tree but we know now that 11 of those people were
them are going to show up 15 trillion times in your family
register as a match to Charlamagne but let's step back
any of the companies. So, theoretically, you actually
scales involved and because of the populations involved,
only one snip which again is never going to be matched by
each one of those is going to show up about 17, 000 times in
pretty much all the nobility of Europe in some way trace their
children and grandchildren themselves. And so you can see
noted that this is so little DNA that none of the companies
equally related genetically to Julius Caesar even though
from Julius Caesar's time which means you and Charlamagne are
ancestry back through Charlamagne. Now statistically
assuming that you're equally rated to all of them just like
that this family line is propagated to the point that
in how we have relationships you can't be descended from
three sentimorgans with each one of them and therefore, with
share more DNA with them. You share zero point zero zero
the Y chromosome, it's likely that noone alive today would
you were to Charlamagne and all the other Europeans, each of
Charlamagne was also related to all 20 million of those people
there is at most one snip in all of the DNA that you get
did have a sample of Charlamagne's DNA other than on
that haven't been recorded. That guy got around. Now those
from Charlamagne and likely none at all now it should be
000 times in your family tree. So if we still assume that DNA
eleven children who reached adulthood also had multiple
you're 1200 years younger than Charlamagne but let's turn back
would ever be able to say that you have a match so even if we
and that means each one of them is going to show up about 33,
the same as about 200 base pairs and more than likely
is completely divisible then you're going to share 0. 002
to less than them because some of those people didn't have any
it's a conservative assumption because you're actually related
Julius Caesar who's 850 years older than Charlamagne. What's
share more DNA with Julius Caesar than you do with
because you have 300 quintilion ancestors at that level. Now,
Charlamagne. So, you're more closely related genetically to
people around in Europe, only about $20 million. Now,
even more interesting to think about is because of the time
descendants. Now, those 30 million people are spread out
centimorgans with each one of those 30 million people and
over your one trillion spaces that you could have ancestors
Julius Caesar. That's 300 base pairs but it's still at most
become a column or Even worse, it may start to collapse in on
go. At 40 generations you would have about one trillion
that means you share that much DNA with Charlamagne and that's
people but you're related to them in multiple ways. So, if
to all of the 30 million people that are alive at the time of
some of those people are the same. And our tree now may
generations you would have almost three 00 quintilion
sixty-eight great grandparents. And that's a lot bigger number
than 1 trillion. It would make for a really big family tree.
itself as we get to less and less people that were related
Charlamagne. Now, this is actually a bad assumption but
you have European ancestry, we can assume that you are related
to in any one generation. You aren't related to as many
twenty-eight generations between them but this is a
further back in time you went, then, we would still be more
have pedigree collapse. Where initially our tree starts to
ever lived. Let alones the ones that are related to you. We all
branch out and we get more and more people. But at some point
genealogy standpoint, you'd be right because there's
number of people the further and further back in time you
segment of DNA and so we want to look at it from a DNA
related to Charlamagne than we are to Julius Caesar and from a
But we know there hasn't even been that many humans that have
history so that we're all on the same page. Charlamagne
DNA is not completely divisible and there's not an unlimited
lived around 8 00 CE in Europe and that would make him about
fortieth great grandparents. That's a lot. But at 6eight
closely related to Charlamagne than we would be to Caesar. But
also lived in Europe but about 50 BCE and so that would make
our fortieth great grandfather. Julius Caesar on the other hand
there was an unlimited number of people, the further and
basis alone, you would think that we must be more closely
perspective. Now, if DNA was completely divisible and if
asked, are we more closely related to Charlamagne or to
him about our 68th great grandfather. So, just on this
Charlamagne but very few of them actually share any DNA
with Charlamagne. One of our viewers, Friedick and Bob,
that everyone of European descent is related to
about upcoming episodes. I've told you in a previous video
Julius Caesar? Now, this is an excellent question and we can
answer it in several different ways. Now, a little bit of
you more closely related to Charlamagne or Julia Caesar?
don't forget to click on the bell if you want to be notified
segment of DNA. Be sure to subscribe to our channel and
Howdy, I'm Andy Lee with Family History Fanatics and this is a we're going to tackle one that I think is an awesome one. Are
We love it when our viewers have great questions and today,
friends.