This video is sponsored by Milanote,
the perfect tool for creating structure out of your creative ideas.
“There’s an abundance of ways to shoot a film. In this world because we have so
many people who are trying to make films, being original is also really difficult.
You really have to go with a kind of abandon when you’re trying to create something special.”
From gritty, low budget movies to the biggest, blockbuster superhero flicks in the world,
Matthew Libatique’s cinematography has covered them all. Directors are drawn to his appetite
for creative risk taking, his bold, subjective, in your face close ups combined with his deep
experience and on set knowledge that has covered a broad array of technical shooting setups.
In this edition of Cinematography Style, we’ll unpack Matthew Libatique’s photography
by unveiling some of his philosophical thoughts and insights about working as a DP, as well as
breaking down some of the gear and technical setups he has used to achieve his vision.
“I started becoming interested in films because of the camera. In undergraduate school I saw Do
The Right Thing. It was like a mind explosion of possibility. It was the first time I ever saw
a film that made it feel like it was possible for a person like me to make films.”
Even though Libatique majored in sociology and communication during his undergraduate
studies at university, he was still strongly drawn to the camera. This led him to enrolling
to study an MFA in cinematography at the AFI. It was there that he met a director
who would be one of his most important and long running collaborators: Darren Aronofsky.
He shot Aronofsky’s early short film Protozoa,
and when it came to working on their debut feature film, Pi, Libatique got called up to shoot it.
“The director gives you a something: a motivation, an idea, a concept.
And then you can build off of that. And the more they give you the more you can do.”
After the success of Aronofsky’s early films, Libatique began working as a feature
film DP with other A-list directors, like: Spike Lee, Jon Favreau and Bradley Cooper.
“When I was becoming interested in filmmaking in undergrad I didn’t study film. It was in sociology
and communications. The one camera they had was an Arri S and it had a variable speed motor on it.
The variable speed motor was set to reverse. So when I got the footage back I had double
exposed everything. And I looked at it and it was a complete and utter f— up on my part.
But then I was sort of inspired by the mistake. I always look back on that moment
and I’ve kinda made a career out of those mistakes working out.”
I’d ascribe Libatique’s appetite for visual risk taking, which include what may be seen
as ‘mistakes’ or ‘happy accidents’, as being a large part of what informs his photography.
What I mean by visual risk taking is that the films that he shoots often carry a visual language
which doesn’t conform to what is seen as mainstream, Hollywood,
cinematic conventions - such as steady, flowing camera moves, neutral colour palettes and more
restrained contrast levels with highlights that don’t blow out and turn to pure white.
At times, his camera movement and lighting deliberately distorts
and challenges what is seen as a perfect, clean image, by finding beauty in imperfections.
For example, his debut film Pi was shot on the highly sensitive black and white reversal film.
This film has an exposure latitude that is far more limited than traditional colour negative
film. What this means visually is that there is a tiny range or spectrum between the brightest parts
of the image and the darkest parts of the image, and that areas of overexposure are quick to blow
out, while shadowy areas of underexposure are quick to get crushed to pure black.
This resulted in an extremely high contrast black and white film,
the complete opposite of Hollywood’s more traditionally accepted colour images
that have gently graduated areas of light and shadow.
Another example of visual risk taking is using body mount rigs on Aronofsky movies like
Requiem For A Dream where he strapped the camera directly onto actors
for a highly subjective, actor focused point of view.
Even in his recent, high end budget work on a Superhero
movie like Venom, he often directed light straight into anamorphic lenses,
deliberately producing excessive horizontal flares that dirtied up the image.
Often these stylistic ideas will come from the director, especially when working with a director
that is more hands on about the cinematography, like Arnofsky. But other times, visual ideas
evolve from a combination of discussions and real world tests prior to shooting.
When prepping for A Star Is Born, Libatique brought a camera into director and actor
Bradley Cooper’s house while he was working on the music to shoot some camera tests with him.
A lot of ideas came out of this test that informed the language of the film.
This included a red light that Bradley Cooper had in his kitchen,
which inspired the use of magenta stage lighting for many of the performances in the film.
A final stylistic philosophy which I’d attribute to Libatique
is his continual awareness of the point of view of the camera
and whether the placement of the camera takes on a subjective or an objective perspective.
In many of his films, particularly in his work with Aronofsky, he’s known for using a highly
subjective camera that is one with the subject or character of the film. He does this by shooting
them almost front on in big close ups that are tight and isolate the character in the frame.
This is also paired with a handheld camera that he operates himself.
By shooting with the characters in a reactive way as if he’s tethered to them
it also makes the shots more character focused and subjective.
This isn’t to say that he always does this. Some other stories he’s shot in a wider,
more detached, objective style. But whatever the movie
he’s always acutely aware of where he places the camera and the effect that it has on the audience.
Before we dive into the gear that he uses to practically bring his ideas together
I’d like to take a moment to thank the sponsor of today’s video, Milanote.
Milanote is a site that acts kind of like a digital wall where you can put up sticky notes,
photos, storyboards, research or whatever you like. I find it to be a great platform to do
pre-production work on for film shoots - whether that’s creating a mood board,
compiling research or references, or putting together a list of gear.
The challenge for any filmmaker or creative is taking the concept or idea that you have
and translating that into a physical final product. Milanote is a great tool for organising
those ideas to better refine your creative vision and make those thoughts come to life.
Milanote is a versatile tool that you can navigate around, type notes in text form, add a to-do list,
drop in images, videos, connect ideas and use colour to tie everything together.
However your brain best visualises ideas, there’s a way to express it.
So if you’re looking for creative inspiration or a better way of conceptualising work
and would like to give Milanote a try you can sign up for free using the link in the description.
Earlier I mentioned that he shot Pi on black and white reversal film,
16mm Eastman Tri-X 200 and Plus-X 50 to be precise. Unlike modern digital cinema cameras
that have something like 17 stops of dynamic range, this reversal film that he shot on
only had about 3 stops of range between the darkest shadows and brightest highlights.
This required his metering of exposure to be very precise. If he let the highlights
be 4 stops brighter than the shadows then they would blow out to white and lose all information.
One way he narrowed down the precision of his exposure was with reflective metering.
“The thing that has really stuck with me
throughout my career is the impact of reflective light.”
There are two approaches to metering or judging how much light there is. One is
called incident metering. This is where the light metre is placed directly between the
source of the light and the subject - such as in front of an actor’s face - facing the light,
to determine how much light is directly hitting them.
Another way to metre light - which Libatique uses - is reflective metering. Instead of facing the
metre towards the light, he faces it towards the subject. This way the light metre measures
the amount of light that is hitting the subject and bouncing back - hence reflective metering.
“I’ve been using a reflective metre my entire career until this digital
revolution. And even so I use a waveform that gives me a reflective reading of somebody’s
skin tone because that’s the only way that I know how to expose anything.”
He mixes up his choice of format, camera and lenses a lot depending on the story
and practical needs. For example, some of Aronofsky’s work he’s shot in 16mm
with Fuji Eterna film for some and Kodak Vision stock for others.
Much of the rest of his work prior to digital cinematography taking over
was shot on 35mm - again alternating between Fujifilm and Kodak stocks for different projects.
Since digital has taken over he mainly uses different versions of
the Arri Alexa - especially the Alexa Mini - but does occasionally use Red cameras.
He even famously used a Canon 7D DSLR with a 24mm L series lens
to shoot the subway scenes in Black Swan, which he shot at 1,600 ISO at a deep stop of T8 ½.
He did it in a documentary style, even pulling his own focus on the barrel of the lens.
His colourist Charlie Hertzfeld later manipulated the 7D footage,
especially the highlights, until it could be cut with the rest of the grainy 16mm footage.
His selection of lenses is as varied as his selection of cameras. He switches between using
spherical and anamorphic lenses. Some examples of lenses he’s used include Panavision Ultra Speeds,
Cooke Anamorphics, Zeiss Ultra Primes, Panavision Primos and Cooke S4s.
On A Star Is Born, he carried two different
anamorphic lens sets - the more modern, cleaner Cooke Anamorphics,
and the super vintage Kowas - and switched between them depending on the feeling he wanted.
He used the Kowas, with their excessive flaring,
hazing and optical imperfections for more subjective close up moments on stage.
Then for the more objective off-stage work he switched to the cleaner Cookes.
Overall most of the lighting in his films does tend to gravitate
more towards the naturalistic side. But, within that, he introduces subtle changes
depending on the nature and tone of the story.
For the more comedic Ruby Sparks a lot of his lighting, although naturalistic,
was very soft and diffused on the actors faces.
While Straight Outta Compton, which tips a bit more into a tense dramatic tone,
had harder shadows, less diffusion and an overall lower exposure while still feeling naturalistic.
So while his lighting is always motivated by reality; the texture,
quality, direction and colour of it changes depending on how he wants the image to feel.
Since the rise in LED lighting, he often uses fixtures like LiteGear LiteMats, Astera Tubes and
of course Arri Skypanels. When he can, he likes rigging them to a board so that he can precisely
set levels and sometimes even make subtle changes as the camera roams around in a space.
Although he has used every kind of rig to move the camera, from a MOVI to a Steadicam to a Dolly,
he is partial to operating the camera handheld on the shoulder. I think in
some contexts this can be seen as one of those creative risks that we talked about earlier.
For example, even on the large budget, traditional blockbuster - Iron Man - which you would expect
to only have perfectly smooth dolly, crane and Steadicam motion - he threw the camera
on his shoulder and gave us some of those on the ground, handheld close ups which he does so well.
Although he uses a lot of different tools to capture his images, he doesn’t do so
haphazardly. Being a good cinematographer is more than just knowing every piece of gear available.
It’s about knowing how you can use that gear to produce a tangible effect.
Sometimes that effect should be a bit more subtle, but certain stories call for boldness.
His images may take large creative risks that go against conventions and expectations,
but those risks are only taken when they are justified by the story.
Thanks for watching this video. If you enjoyed it please give the video a thumbs up and subscribe
or, if you’re so inclined you can support the channel by getting some of my original merch
or by signing up to Patreon where I post weekly videos free of ads.
Otherwise, until next time, thanks for watching and goodbye.