welcome to what's the crime i'm linda and today we're going to talk about the recent letter
that was sent to the judge by leticia stouk in the gannon stealth case this is not the
first time she's written to the judge now leticia has recently started representing
herself in the case but before she did she had to speak her mind and send this letter
so today i'm going to get into it and we're going to do a little dive into it but before
i get into it if you'd like to be part of the it's a crime community don't forget
to hit that subscribe button below hit the notification bell also please give this video
a like if you like it and share it out where you can now let's get into it
this letter was dated on february 21st 2021 it's a four-page letter written by leticia
now something i noticed right away and i just did a little comparison to other letters she
wrote and it's actually in much larger writing than what she usually does but it is leticia and
it has the same type of spelling errors grammar errors and word salad so this letter was filed
on march the 8th and there was a hearing on march the 5th and the judge actually addressed
leticia about this letter he said i did get your letter does this mean you still want to represent
yourself or not she says yes and the judge says okay because you're dancing around the issue
and i did cover that in a previous video so let's get into the letter and i'm just going to say that
i'm going to read it as is you'll see what i mean in a minute conflict hearing info judge werner
on february 19 2021 i was unable to talk with judge bain about my conflicts with my defense team
due to one the actual privacy of the booth and the transport over i explained in detail to him
expressing my concerns of privacy now i'd love to know what kind of privacy she's talking about here
and the privacy that she needed for transport i mean this woman as you know was a flight risk
and she did talk in court about her wearing handcuffs and she was actually complaining
that she was wearing handcuffs at the law library let's go back to the letter i had a very difficult
morning mentally because i am not mentally well now notice here how she makes sure to add this in
about her mental condition she says how difficult her days are here because she's not mentally well
now in my opinion she's pushing back and you'll see why in a moment but she's pushing back because
her competency assessments came back as competent not once but twice and she tried to spin around
in circles and act crazy and flick the lights on and off so that she can get a different diagnosis
so now she's on to plan b here in my opinion moving on one of the main issues with my attorneys
is their lack of ability to gather evidence due to this i find little value in the term expert
first they were unable to obtain my mental health records from charleston south carolina
when i finally paid a firm in south carolina to obtain them there's a few things here for sure
i mentioned this before but the reason why she wants to represent herself in my opinion
is because she has a few things up her sleeve and something or some things that i'm sure that the
attorneys wouldn't want to be part of or couldn't be a part of so automatically i question her here
and i questioned who the company was or the firm that she paid in south carolina to obtain
her mental health records remember the fiasco of leticia paying fakepolygraph.com uh to give her a
fake result about not doing harm to her stepson etc red flag here so i then ask well why were
they unable to obtain my mental health records right are there health records even to obtain
now she did mention about an expert in court and how she uses that term loosely but here
she's putting the blame obviously on her defense team for not being competent and not an expert by
any means or experts and whatever it is that she paid to get much like fakepolygraph.com report
it didn't make it to them for some reason or couldn't be usable now my hunch is the latter
and you can tell me what your thoughts are in the comments below why would the defense team
not get them if there's something and they are the defense team and they were the ones who
requested to competency hearings so it's not logical in my opinion however this is leticia
we're talking about moving on i was diagnosed with and it's redacted and received treatment
before work for over 28 hours of care the school district even provided extra services and later
let me medically resign due to the ongoing reality breaks this is funny reality breaks i mean
she's saying they let me medically resign due to the ongoing reality breaks
shouldn't it be breaks from reality anyways in 2018 i was hospitalized in canada crossing the
border for two days and completed more of treatment when i returned i tell you this
because it sets the stage for why i cannot work with my attorneys in this letter that was the only
thing that was redacted was what she was diagnosed with and also i say wait a minute about the 2018
because wasn't she working at getting her doctorate at this time and according to her
linkedin she was as well so this is interesting also in 2018 she was fired from her job in south
carolina so i'm not sure about this medical resignation stuff i don't trust a thing she
says at this point and so naturally i question everything but in 2018 she was an early childhood
teacher and was fired on august 30th 2018. all right next i'm not sure what she's talking about
going to canada for two days for treatment here it would be interesting to see what this is about
however i do wonder if she took a two-day vacation across the border and now she's using this because
maybe she thinks you can't get medical records from canada or what have you so i don't know
back to her letter i tell you this because it sets the stage for why i cannot work with my
attorneys i signed release forms for them to get all this information so they would have a better
understanding of why i'm all over the place some days so in essence here she says she can't work
with her attorneys because she's mentally not well and that they aren't gathering evidence
she wants them to gather it's funny though because she wants to be deemed mentally unwell so
i don't know and her words make one heck of a salad i asked them to use the info from a
non-biased doctor who worked with me more than two hours but instead they sent a lady who was
clearly an actress and friends with the d.a she spoke about him in an unprofessional manner
their history and his election okay so now she's accusing the professional who assessed her to be
an actress and friends with the district attorney michael allen and she says that this actress
acted unprofessional and confided in leticia about the history together of this actress and
mr michael allen she says now i'm sure all this was true but i thought she worked for the court
not one particular side i thought she was an actress latisha my attorneys did this to make me
look like a pejurius her words individual instead it was malfeasances on their part i have included
several reasons to support my claim as i kept a timeline of these conflicts and so now she starts
to list seven reasons to support her claims number one is communication is broken beyond repair
two inconsiderate of evidence three my evidence for overlooking statue of evidence her words
five sharing info 6 my judge and 7 defenses let's dive in again number one communication is broken
beyond repair i explained these issues to judge bain including the lack of access
and visitations in complete detail number two inconsiderate of evidence since march 2020 which
is when she got arrested i asked my attorneys to preserve the game stop footage to locate the texas
police officer whom i spoke with and to get the crew's passenger list instead they spent months
contacting my family for mitigation when asked certain things they kept saying they will let the
investigators know one year later same answer now this is something i would love to dive more into
here are two things we haven't heard before so my question is is this the two pieces
she was talking about in court that no one could refute not even science
what are your thoughts and i have two words for you besides gamestop nintendo switch i'm wondering
if she did something at this gamestop in texas with the switch and gamestop you can
trade games you can trade consoles i really want to know at this point now she mentions
texas like i said which makes me look at the map naturally from colorado springs oh to let's say
pace florida where gannon was found and lo and behold you gotta go through texas and if
you're wondering about what she's talking about the cruise passenger list from my understanding
and it could be something totally different but from my understanding and my guess here
he is here again i still don't know what he looks like my guess here is the cruise that al
and leticia went on in january it was right before i believe it was in january beginning of january
right before gannon went missing it was leticia and al's fifth anniversary now just a reminder
as well leticia explains away circumstances and evidence like gannon's sock being found north of
colorado springs in a forest and the blood being found on her bumper etc and here it is to me this
is her explaining it away ganon's nintendo switch which from my understanding wasn't found perhaps
it is now and now we see game stop number three my evidence i haven't physically seen any while being
held at cjc for one year yes kovid but inmates were still being held as our constitutional
rights were adjusted she can't make it through one letter or one hearing without talking about her
constitutional rights i get it you can talk about your constitutional rights but she just really
drives us home just an observation she will be getting the physical evidence though they talked
about it in a previous hearing it was said to just double check that everything is photographed etc
before she gets her hands on it number four overlooking statue of evidence they overlooked
the competency statue about video recording human error okay but this happens often with
evidence in which me the non-expert has to provide corrections to evidence number five sharing info
they were texting my family and giving them info that they should not have causing several disputes
so family matters are starting to get tough i guess from the sounds of it wonder what this is
all about and or i should ask i wonder what the infor the text was all about number six my judge
they filed that motion knowing this county would not grant me new attorneys to sabotage my chances
of a trial by judge they knew i wanted to present evidence to him without exposing any info on
my son's father however they created incorrect conflicts instead of addressing the real issues
they could have filed the pro se only instead of talking about my defense to sabotage my trial by
judge so here it is folks she's been asking several times if she wanted new attorneys and
she decided to go pro se and now she's bringing up her son's father now at first i'm thinking
is this her way to you know butter things up so it doesn't sound like stepson to her she
just wants to say son does it sound better to her for some reason when she's talking about gannon
but wait until i read this next because this is where it starts to get bizarre
now side note i do recommend that you read this letter out loud too just so you can see the
obstacles one would endure while reading this out loud number seven defenses indeed i am innocent
but i will not put myself or others in danger running the defense against my biological son
when the system is letting two men run free who are involved one is a prominent member
of an independent business now we have the biological sun wording put in here magically
if you are a viewer who knows something that i don't hear can you send me some links with
proof that she has a biological son or what's going on i'd really appreciate it but i do have
a theory that pops immediately into mind here and it's to me she needs someone else
uh the biological son perhaps walking to that truck that day that gannon went missing
that looks like ganon or i don't know at this point this is just something off the cuff here
now the two men running free she's talking about i'm assuming is eguardo and the other guy she
talked about previously in her reports she changed the story three times i believe possibly even five
it's been a while and the independent business is drugs so according to leticia they used the
not guilty reason by insanity to get a hearing knowing i'm not guilty to cover up their lack of
representation although i had bouts of insanity and still do i did not murder or abuse anyone
nor would that be a defense because it's my understanding that you actually did
do it however i will protect my bio son and i will protect the drugs and violence documented
from my stepson i'm starting to think like is she calling harley her son now what's going on here
but whatever it is she's certainly starting to stir a pot here isn't she like seriously i wonder
how far the eyes rolled back into the judge's head after reading this she's making this look like a
giant circus correction she's creating this to be a giant circus in closing she says the truth is
the court is holding the wrong person and for the wrong crimes this whole process has been
nefarious from denying me an attorney threatening me in the bathroom away from cameras to confess
taking advantage of me being delusional threatening my other kids freedom or else etc i
am going to keep making it known sir just how much the state has done in this wrongful incarceration
i will continue to be an advocate for myself because i am not a murderer and the level that
the prosecution goes through to promote a wrongful conviction is absurd truth is they could see a
video from someone else and they would dismiss that person as a lunatic they have far too much
invested in this wrongful incarceration to admit they were and are wrong for these reasons and
because my defense team is in cahoots with them i am left with no other choice but to represent
myself denying me my rights under the constitution has happened throughout this process from the
detectives the jail and now my legal team every day i am getting worse mentally due to inadequate
representation and being held hostage for a crime i did not commit these are my conflict issues and
my reason for asking to go pro se as always thank you for your time notable she didn't sign it as
dr t stoke this time and if you didn't see it or didn't see one of my last videos about this
leticia says she's a professional and she wants to represent herself so i can see why the judge
asks again what do you want to do because after this letter he's like what is she talking about
so let's have a chit chat and let's actually do a little deeper dive into what's going on
what is this business about a biological sun what is she talking about gamestop in texas
so many questions and so many answers are needed at this time see you in the comments
let's have a chit chat and let's figure this out please subscribe if you haven't done so already
please like and please share if you'd like to join in the crime ring which is my membership
you can do so at the join button just below this video thank you so much for watching see you soon
you