YOUR PRIVACY AT RISK.
♪
>> BUT FIRST, A FOX NEWS ALERT,
ABORTION ACTIVISTS PROTESTING
THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION TO
OVERTURN ROE V. WADE FOR A THIRD
DAY NOW.
BUT THE PROTESTS ARE GETTING
MORE VIOLENT FROM RIOTERS
VANDALIZING BUILDINGS TO
CRIMINALS DEFACING THE VERMONT
STATEHOUSE, TO ARSONISTS SETTING
A COLORADO PREGNANCY CENTER ON
FIRE.
THE SUPREME COURT DECISION GIVES
THE DECISION ABOUT ABORTION LAWS
BACK TO THE STATES, AND STACEY
ABRAMS, WHO IS RUNNING FOR
GOVERNOR AGAIN IN GEORGIA, COULD
PLAY A ROLE IN THOSE DECISIONS
IN THE FUTURE.
BUT TODAY ON "FOX NEWS SUNDAY,"
SHE REFUSED TO SAY IF SHE
BELIEVES THERE SHOULD BE ANY
LIMITS ON ABORTION.
WATCH.
>> DO YOU SUPPORT MY LIMITATION
ON ABORTION, OR DOES IT -- DO
YOU THINK THAT WOMEN SHOULD HAVE
THE RIGHT TO HAVE AN ABORTION
ALL THE WAY UP TO NINE
MONTHSESOME.
>> I BELIEVE IN ABORTION AS A
MEDICAL DECISION, AND I BELIEVE
THAT THAT SHOULD BE A CHOICE A
MADE BETWEEN A DOCTOR AND A
WOMAN AND IN CONSULTATION WITH
HER FAMILY.
MARIA: I’M JUST ASKING YOU,
YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT CARING
ABOUT THE LIVES OF WOMEN, I’M
JUST ASKING AT WHAT POINT DO YOU
START TO CARE ABOUT THE LIFE OF
THAT BABY, THAT BABY GIRL IN
SOME CASES?
>> WHAT I WOULD SAY IS THAT IT
IS A MEDICAL DECISION --
MARTHA: I’M GOING TO TAKE THAT
AS UP TO NINE MONTHS IN SOME
CASES DEPENDING ON THE WOMAN,
CORRECT?
>> THAT IS NOT WHAT I SAID.
I SAID THIS IS A MEDICAL
DECISION.
>> I MEAN, IF YOU CONSIDER THAT
70 YEARS AGO 90% OF COUNTRY WAS
EXISTENCE ABORTION, IN THE
1990s BILL CLINTON SAID
ABORTION SHOULD BE SAFE, LEGAL
AND RARE.
AND NOW YOU HAVE DEMOCRATIC
POLITICIANS THAT WON’T EVEN
CONDEMN AN ABORTION IN THE NINTH
MONTH, NICOLE.
IT’S REALLY BEEN THIS SHOCKING
TRANSITION.
>> YOU KNOW, WE WERE TALKING
BEFORE THE SHOW ON HOW
TECHNOLOGY HAS REALLY ENABLED US
TO SEE WHAT IS I GROWING IN THE
MOTHER’S WOMB.
AND I CAN TELL YOU AFTER 20
WEEKS OF AGE, YOU DO SEE THE
HUMAN LIFE FORM GROWING INSIDE.
WE HAVE MRI, ULTRASOUND AND
EVERYTHING, AND YOU SEE THE
MOVEMENTS OF THIS BABY.
FOR THEM TO SAY THIS ISN’T A
HUMAN, YOU KNOW, AND STILL
CONSIDER ABORTING A VIABLE,
HEALTHY CHILD, IT IS REALLY
UPSETTING FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE.
AND THE RADICALIZATION OF THE
PRO-CHOICE MOVEMENT, IN MY
OPINION, IS WHY YOU’VE GOTTEN SO
MUCH SUPPORT FOR THE PRO-LIFE
MOVEMENT, BECAUSE A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE AGAINST THESE LATE
TERM ABORTIONS.
BUT ONE THING THAT WE’RE SEEING
RIGHT NOW, YOU’RE SEEING
VIOLENCE ON PREGNANCY CRISIS
CENTERS, SAFE HAVENS FOR LOW
INCOME WOMEN.
HOW THE HECK DOES THAT REPRESENT
PRO-CHOICE?
GET AN ABORTION WITH OR BE OR
TARGET AD FOR VIOLENCE?
WOULDN’T IT BE GREAT IF WE SAW
THE SAME MOTIONAL AND FINANCIAL
SUPPORT THAT WE’RE SEEING WITH
THE PRO-ABORTION UNIT --
MOVEMENT FOR THESE WOMEN WHO ARE
BEING TOLD THEY DON’T HAVE THE
MEANS ON TO HAVE A BABY.
GIVE THEM THE CHOICE TO CHOOSE
LIFE.
I MADE THIS DECISION WHEN I WAS
17, IN HIGH SCHOOL.
I BECAME PREGNANT, AND I AM
GRATEFUL EVERY SINGLE DAY FOR
EVERYONE WHO RALLIED AGAINST ME
AND SUPPORTED ME SO I COULD HAVE
THAT CHILD.
SHOULDN’T WE BE DOING THAT TO
SUPPORT WOMEN WHO WANT TO CHOOSE
LIFE?
THAT IS THE PRO-CHOICE MOVEMENT
THAT I AM ABOUT.
>> WHAT IS INTERESTING ABOUT
WHAT YOU’RE SAYING, TOO, IS IT
GETS ALMOST DOWN TO THE MORALITY
OF THE ENTIRE THING.
AND NOT TOO LONG AGO TO WHAT YOU
WERE JUST SAYING, TRACE, BILL
CLINTON, YOU LOOK BACK AT JOE
BIDEN EVEN FROM, I THINK,
2006 --
>> RIGHT.
>> -- AND HE HAS A VERY
DIFFERENT STANCE ON IT.
IT WAS NOT TOO LONG AGO THAT
THAT EVEN PEOPLE WHO ARE VERY
FAR LEFT OR WERE VERY PAR LEFT
WOULD EVEN ADMIT THAT IT WAS A
TERRIBLE DECISION FOR A WOMAN TO
HAVE TO MAKE IF SHE HAD TO MAKE
THE DECISION TO HAVE AN
ABORTION.
AND THAT IS -- THAT AFFECTS THE
WOMAN, IT AFFECTS THE CHILD,
OBVIOUSLY, IN IRREVERSIBLE WAYS.
BUT NOW IT SEEMS TO BE
CHAMPIONED THIS MANY A WAY.
AND PEOPLE -- IN A WAY.
AND PEOPLE ARE ADVOCATING FOR
YOU TO HAVE AN ABORTION AS
OPPOSED, NICOLE, TO GIVING YOU
THE CHOICE TO CHOOSE WHATEVER
YOU WANT.
IT’S TERRIBLE, AND IT HONESTLY
SEEMS LIKE THERE’S A MORAL DECAY
THAT HAS IS SET IN IN OUR
SOCIETY.
>> AND YOU’VE SEEN THIS ACROSS
THE COUNTRY BECAUSE YOU HAVE
THESE PROTESTS, THESE RAH
RAGING, ANGRY PROTESTS.
PEOPLE ARE ANGRY BECAUSE THERE
ARE NOW LIMITS IN SOME STATES ON
ABORTION.
THE SUPREME COURT DID NOT BAN
ABORTION IN THIS COUNTRY.
YOUR STATE LEGISLATURE, IF YOU
LIVE IN ONE OF THOSE STATES,
BANNED ABORTION.
I KNOW YOU’RE GOING TO BE
SHOCKED THAT ALEXANDRIA
OCASIO-CORTEZ SAID SOMETHING
OUTRAGEOUS.
I WANT TO GET YOUR TAKE.
[LAUGHTER]
>> THE THING A LOT OF PEOPLE
DON’T LIKE TO TALK ABOUT IS THE
FACT THAT NOT EVERY DEMOCRAT IS
PRO-CHOICE, OKAY?
SO THE ONES THAT AREN’T, WE
REALLY NEED TO REASSESS IF IT’S
APPROPRIATE FOR THEM TO CONTINUE
TO SERVE IN 2022.
>> SO IF YOU’RE A DEMOCRAT AND
YOU ARE PRO-LIFE AND YOU ARE FOR
SOME CONCERN A MODERATE, OH,
YOU’RE OUT, YOU NEED TO BE OUT.
>> WHAT’S THE SECOND WORD THERE?
CHOICE.
WHAT DO THE DEMOCRATS AND THE
HARD LEFT WANT TO REMOVE?
YOUR CHOICE.
THIS IS ABOUT THE LIE THAT WE’VE
TALKED ABOUT, THE PUSHING
NARRATIVE.
TO YOUR POINT, THEY DIDN’T BAN
ABORTION.
THERE’S A 151-WEEK LIMIT --
15-WEEK LIMIT BEFORE THEM X
STATES WILL DECIDE.
STACEY ABRAMS IS ONE OF THE
BIGGEST FRAUDS IN THIS, BUT
SHE’S AN EXAMPLE OF THIS
CONSTANT LIE THAT’S BEING PUSHED
OUT.
SHE’S GONE FROM I WAS GOVERNOR
OF GEORGIA, I SHOULD BE GOVERNOR
OF GEORGIA TO BEING A LEFTIST
ORGANIZER WHO’S MADE HERSELF
RICH AT THE EXPENSE OF GEORGIANS
WHILE LYING ABOUT HAIR CHOICES.
THEY HAVE CHOSEN IN GEORGIA,
THAT’S HOW OUR SYSTEM WORKS --
WE’RE A CONSTITUTIONAL
REPUBLIC -- AND FROM THAT PEOPLE
MAKE A DECISION THAT THEIR
LEGISLATORS REPRESENT.
WE DELEGATE THAT POWER TO THEM.
THAT’S WHY THIS COUNTRY WORKS
WELL, NOT MOB RULE.
>> YEAH.
AND WHILE WE’RE ON POLLICES
HERE, I KNOW THIS PERSON, THE
FORMER PRESIDENT, IT’S
FASCINATING BECAUSE NOW YOU HAVE
REPUBLICANS COMING OUT, AND
THEY’RE SAYING, YOU KNOW, THIS
RULING CAME DOWN BECAUSE OF THE
FORMER PRESIDENT.
AND I’M GOING TO PLAY THIS SOUND
BITE, WE’LL GET YOUR REACTION
ARE, LARA, ON THE OTHER SIDE.
>> I PROMISED TO NOMINATE JUDGES
AND JUSTICES WHO WOULD STAND UP
FOR THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE
CONSTITUTION AND WHO WOULD
HONESTLY AND FAITHFULLY
INTERPRET THE LAW AS WRITTEN.
THANKS TO THE COURAGE FOUND
WITHIN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT, THIS LONG DIVISIVE ISSUE
WILL BE DECIDED BY THE STATES.
AND BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
>> LET’S LISTEN TO LINDSEY
GRAHAM ALSO VERY QUICKLY,
BECAUSE HE ALSO GIVES THE FORMER
PRESIDENT CREDIT FOR THIS.
WATCH.
>> THIS IS A HUGE VICTORY FOR
THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT.
PRESIDENT TRUMP DESERVES THE
LION’S SHARE OF CREDIT HERE.
HE FOUGHT LIKE A TIGER TO PUT
THREE CONSTITUTIONAL
CONSERVATIVE JUDGES ON THE
COURT.
HE STOOD BEHIND KAVANAUGH, AND
ALL OF US WHO HAVE BEEN WORKING
FOR THE LAST 50 YEARS TO GET
THIS RIGHT, TO HAVE A
CONSTITUTIONAL RESET, FRIDAY WAS
A GLORIOUS DAY.
>> BUT YOU KNOW WHO’S GETTING
HIT?
THE NEVER TRUMPERS, BECAUSE THE
CONSERVATIVES ARE SAYING,
LISTEN, YOU ARE APPLAUDING THIS
RULING BY THE SUPREME COURT, BUT
YOU DIDN’T HAVE THE GUTS TO BACK
THE BAN WHO ACTUALLY MADE THAT
HAPPEN.
YOUR THOUGHTS ON IT.
>> YOU HEARD IT FROM LINDSEY
GRAHAM AND A LOT OF FOLKS, IT IS
BECAUSE OF THE JUSTICES THAT
DONALD TRUMP PUT, NOMINATED TO
THE SUPREME COURT THAT THIS
DECISION WAS REACHED.
AND WHAT HE SAID THERE, I DON’T
THINK WE CAN DOWNPLAY ANY OR WE
SHOULD BE DOWNPLAYING, BECAUSE
HE USED THE WORD COURAGE, MY
FATHER-IN-LAW, WHEN HE WAS
TALKING ABOUT THESE JUSTICES.
THE FACT THAT THERE WAS SO MUCH
EXTERNAL PRESSURE ON THESE
JUSTICES, I MEAN, HOW MANY
TIMES, YOU KNOW, WERE WE
COVERING THE POKES OUTSIDE OF
THEIR HOMES ILLEGALLY THERE
PROTESTING -- FOLKS -- THE
ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT AGAINST
BRETT KAVANAUGH, AND YET THEY
STILL CAME TO THIS DECISION AND
THESE WERE THE RIGHT INDIVIDUALS
TO SERVE ON THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT FROM.
THEY HAD THE COURAGE TO FOLLOW
THE CONSTITUTION.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE CONSTITUTION,
ABORTION IS NOT A RIGHT
GUARANTEED WITHIN THE
CONSTITUTION, AND IT SHOULD BE
SENT BACK TO THE STATES SO WE,
THE PEOPLE, CAN OPINE ON IT.
SO, YES, A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE
GIVING CREDIT TO MY
FATHER-IN-LAW TODAY, I’LL BE
ANOTHER ONE TO DO THAT.
>> I’D LIKE TO ADD A DEMOCRAT
POINT OF CREDIT FOR THIS, AND IT
WAS IMPORTANT TO THE NOMINATION
OF THOSE JUSTICES.
HARRY REID, WHO GOT RID OF THE
FILIBUSTER, IF HE HADN’T DONE
THAT, MAYBE DEMOCRATS WOULD BE
IN POWER FOREVER, THEN THAT
ABILITY BUDGET THERE.
THIS IS A WIN FOR THE
CONSTITUTION, THE IT’S A WIN FOR
THE PEOPLE.
>> I AGREE, I UNDERSTAND WHAT
LINDSAY GRAHAM’S SAYING THIS IS
A BIG WIN FOR THE PRO-LIFE
ADVOCATES, BUT REALLY WHAT IT
CAME TOWN TO WAS ORIGINAL
ORIGINALISM BASED ON THE
CONSTITUTION, AND THAT’S WHAT
SCOTUS RULED ON THIS PAST WEEK.
IT WAS ABOUT THE ORIGINAL
CONCEPT OF THE CONSTITUTION AND,
THEREFORE IT’S GOING TO BE
DELIVERED TO THE STATES.
SO IT IS MUCH MORE LEGAL THAN IT
IS POLITICAL AND MORAL.
>> AND THE SUPREME COURT IS
SAYING SPECIFICALLY LET ALABAMA
BE ALABAMA, LET CALIFORNIA BE
CALIFORNIA, AND IF THERE IS A
PROBLEM AND YOU DISAGREE WITH
YOUR STATE’S HAWS, IT IS NOW
BACK IN YOUR HANDS, AND YOU CAN