In the context of the World Wide Web, deep linking consists of using a hyperlink that
links to a specific, generally searchable or indexed, piece of web content on a website,
rather than the home page.
Example This link: http:en.wikipedia.orgDeep_linking#Example
is an example of a deep link.
The URL contains all the information needed to point to a particular item, in this case
the example section of the English Wikipedia article on deep linking, instead of the Wikipedia
home page at http:www.wikipedia.org/.
Deep linking and HTTP The technology behind the World Wide Web,
the Hypertext Transfer Protocol, does not actually make any distinction between "deep"
links and any other links—all links are functionally equal.
This is intentional; one of the design purposes of the Web is to allow authors to link to
any published document on another site.
The possibility of so-called "deep" linking is therefore built into the Web technology
of HTTP and URLs by default—while a site can attempt to restrict deep links, to do
so requires extra effort.
According to the World Wide Web Consortium Technical Architecture Group, "any attempt
to forbid the practice of deep linking is based on a misunderstanding of the technology,
and threatens to undermine the functioning of the Web as a whole".
Usage Some commercial websites object to other sites
making deep links into their content either because it bypasses advertising on their main
pages, passes off their content as that of the linker or, like The Wall Street Journal,
they charge users for permanently valid links.
Sometimes, deep linking has led to legal action such as in the 1997 case of Ticketmaster versus
Microsoft, where Microsoft deep-linked to Ticketmaster's site from its Sidewalk service.
This case was settled when Microsoft and Ticketmaster arranged a licensing agreement.
Ticketmaster later filed a similar case against Tickets.com, and the judge in this case ruled
that such linking was legal as long as it was clear to whom the linked pages belonged.
The court also concluded that URLs themselves were not copyrightable, writing: "A URL is
simply an address, open to the public, like the street address of a building, which, if
known, can enable the user to reach the building.
There is nothing sufficiently original to make the URL a copyrightable item, especially
the way it is used.
There appear to be no cases holding the URLs to be subject to copyright.
On principle, they should not be."
Deep linking and web technologies Websites which are built on web technologies
such as Adobe Flash and AJAX often do not support deep linking.
This can result in usability problems for people visiting such websites.
For example, visitors to these websites may be unable to save bookmarks to individual
pages or states of the site, web browser forward and back buttons may not work as expected,
and use of the browser's refresh button may return the user to the initial page.
However, this is not a fundamental limitation of these technologies.
Well-known techniques, and libraries such as SWFAddress and unFocus History Keeper,
now exist that website creators using Flash or AJAX can use to provide deep linking to
pages within their sites.
Court rulings Probably the earliest legal case arising out
of deep-linking was the 1996 Scottish case of The Shetland Times vs The Shetland News
where the Times accused the News of appropriating stories on the Times' website as its own.
At the beginning of 2006, in a case between the search engine Bixee.com and job site Naukri.com,
the Delhi High Court in India prohibited Bixee.com from deeplinking to Naukri.com.
In December 2006, a Texas court ruled that linking by a motocross website to videos on
a Texas-based motocross video production website did not constitute fair use.
The court subsequently issued an injunction.
This case, SFX Motor Sports Inc., v. Davis, was not published in official reports, but
is available at 2006 WL 3616983.
In a February 2006 ruling, the Danish Maritime and Commercial Court found systematic crawling,
indexing and deep-linking by portal site ofir.dk of real estate site Home.dk not to conflict
with Danish law or the database directive of the European Union.
The Court even stated that search engines are desirable for the functioning of the Internet
of today; and that, when publishing information on the Internet, one must assume—and accept—that
search engines deep link to individual pages of one's website.
Opt out Web site owners wishing to prevent search
engines from deep linking are able to use the existing Robots Exclusion Standard to
specify their desire or otherwise for their content to be indexed.
People in favor of deep linking often feel that content owners who fail to provide a
robots.txt file are implying that they do not object to deep linking either by search
engines or others who might link to their content.
People against deep linking often claim that content owners may be unaware of the Robots
Exclusion Standard or may not use robots.txt for other reasons.
Deep linking is also practiced outside the search engine context, so some participating
in this debate question the relevance of the Robots Exclusion Standard to controversies
about Deep Linking.
The Robots Exclusion Standard does not programmatically enforce its directives so it does not prevent
search engines and others who do not follow polite conventions from deep linking.
See also Copyright aspects of hyperlinking and framing
Fragment identifier Framing
Inline linking Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry
References
External links Linking Law - Netlitigation's summary and
case law archive.
American Library Association - list of links to articles about deep linking
Discussion of the Shetland Times vs Shetland News case, 1996
Report on the Indian Court Ruling Report on Danish Court Ruling
Cory Doctorow on fan-made radio podcasts: "What deep linking means."
from BoingBoing Deep Linking is Good Linking - Usability implications
of deep links