The moon watches over our planet from 239,000 miles away.
In 1969 Apollo 11 succeeded in its mission to land the first astronauts on the moon…
but with the Apollo program abandoned by 1972, humans have still walked on only a fraction
of the lunar surface.
So, all these years later, why aren’t we more interested in getting up close to our
nearest celestial neighbour?
This is Unveiled, and today we’re answering the extraordinary question; why is the moon
still unexplored?
Are you a fiend for facts?
Are you constantly curious?
Then why not subscribe to Unveiled for more clips like this one?
And ring the bell for more fascinating content!
Getting to the moon was the major goal in the Space Race that raged through the 1950s
and ‘60s between the USA and the USSR.
And, while the Soviet Union beat the US to most of the other space milestones, it was
NASA who ultimately bagged the big prize… landing Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin onto
the surface of the moon, in July 1969.
The images and Armstrong’s iconic message back to Earth are record of one of the most
defining moments of the twentieth century.
In the years following, the Cold War tension that had fuelled the Space Race, and the non-stop
production of rockets by both sides, gradually eased.
In America, the budget for space exploration was slashed, starting with the cancellation
of the Apollo program, which was shelved before reaching its conclusion.
All of which means that, as of 2020, only twelve people have ever stepped foot on the
lunar surface.
And the last of those left the moon almost fifty years ago.
It wasn’t all doom and gloom, though.
It was more like a change of tactic.
By the 1970s, it had become clear that the future of space exploration was with robots
and probes.
And, in more recent decades, our machines have continually improved so that now they
are our pioneers not just on the moon, but in space in general.
The Soviet Union realized this new direction before NASA did, however.
After putting the first satellites into orbit, and even sending the first space probe to
the planet Venus, the USSR launched the first successful lunar rover, Lunokhod 1, in November
1970.
Lunokhod 1 survived on the moon for eleven months, sending a wealth of data back to Earth
for study.
Now, we could analyse the moon from a distance, without any need to risk human life.
And in the years since, rovers have remained vitally important for all sorts of space missions.
Today, we’ve sent plenty of rovers to Mars, for example.
But the world hasn’t forgotten about the moon, with the China National Space Administration
deploying a modern day, state-of-the-art rover, the Yutu-2.
It made the trip to the dark side of the moon (the side rarely seen by human eyes) aboard
the Chang’e 4 spacecraft, landing in January 2019.
Making the dark side its home, Yutu-2 is in uncharted territory.
Despite fifty years of rover missions, however, so much of the moon remains unexplored in
detail.
There are more than a few reasons for this.
The moon is obviously vast, it’s distant, and it has an at times extremely unforgiving
terrain.
The surface area of the moon is roughly 14.6 million square miles in total.
That’s actually smaller than the world’s largest continent, Asia.
But it’s still a lot of land to cover.
Back in the ‘70s, Lunokhod 1 travelled at a top speed of less than one mile per hour,
meaning it would have taken this particular rover more than sixteen hundred years to completely
cover every inch of the moon.
Nowadays, speed still isn’t a priority for lunar vehicles, and the CNSA’s Yutu rovers
are actually even slower, averaging at less than 0.1 miles per hour… which means it
would take them more than sixteen thousand years to walk the moon.
The longest-lived rover so far is the Opportunity rover, which roamed the surface of Mars for
just fourteen years… and covered just twenty-eight miles in that time.
Those fourteen years undoubtedly stand as one of the greatest space feats in history,
but we clearly still have a long way to go before we build anything that’ll last for
centuries!
One prominent issue that rovers on the moon face is that the lunar surface is so covered
in craters from asteroids.
In fact, the moon boasts one of the biggest impact craters we know about in the solar
system, the South Pole-Aitken crater, which is more than 1,500 miles across and up to
five miles deep.
Landscapes like this aren’t impossible for autonomous exploration, but they do pose a
big challenge, not least because all of the ups and downs increase the total surface area,
too.
But it’s not as though rovers are the only tool we’ve ever used to explore celestial
bodies from afar.
At the simplest level, we have a long history of observing the moon from Earth, by pointing
increasingly advanced telescopes in its direction.
But we’ve also dispatched a number of satellites and probes into lunar orbit over the years,
as well.
There are many active satellites currently in orbit around the moon, from the ISRO’s
Chandrayaan-2… to NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
In fact, we’re so well versed with machines in lunar orbit, that we’ve even sent probes
to the moon and pointed them back at Earth to get a better look at our own planet, such
as with the THEMIS satellites.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or the LRO, is perhaps the best device we’ve ever built
to study the moon… and this satellite alone has actually mapped an estimated ninety-eight
percent of the lunar surface in 3D.
So, in some ways, the moon actually isn’t that unexplored at all!
Thanks to modern technology, we can also study lunar rocks and lunar soil remotely, and we
can use imagining tools like spectrometers to break down and understand the moon’s
chemical arrangement.
We can do all of this without ever risking human astronauts on a crewed mission.
But there are crewed moon missions on the horizon.
There are plans in motion to put people on the moon, once again.
NASA’s Artemis space program is probably the most high-profile project in the pipeline.
The ultimate aim for Artemis is to send the next man and the first woman to the moon…
but it has even loftier goals further down the line, too, like the construction of a
manned outpost and an orbital space station called the Lunar Gateway.
This would be to the moon what the ISS is to Earth, providing room for a constant human
presence.
The Artemis Program and others like it, though, aren’t without their critics.
Some argue that the goals of Artemis are too vague; that it doesn’t have a clear enough
mission statement… and there’s ongoing debate over whether returning to the moon
is beneficial enough to warrant the financial cost.
The prospect of living on the moon is certainly exciting, and plenty of people would jump
at the opportunity… but what else is there to justify the expense?
That’s the question being asked by a lot of private space companies, at least… many
of which don’t appear to have a huge interest in going to the moon specifically.
Not unless it’s to build a lunar launchpad, from which we could (in theory) more easily
explore the rest of the solar system instead.
In general, the big private companies leading the charge back into space have their sights
set on other missions.
Blue Origin, for example, wants to construct an orbital city based on designs from the
1970s by the physicist Gerard K. O’Neill.
Meanwhile, SpaceX is primarily focussed on getting to Mars.
And, although there have been private companies with contracts to explore the moon, including
Moon Express, they haven’t accomplished anything of note.
In the early part of the twenty-first century, then, it could be that priorities have changed…
and that the Moon is now seen as more a steppingstone on the way to even bigger, better and even
more distant worlds.
Or there could yet be hope in the form of space tourism, with the moon one day becoming
a popular, short-haul destination in space.
After all, the famous hotelier family, Hilton, reportedly once wanted to build a hotel on
the lunar surface.
Maybe, one day, this particular vision will be realised.
If it was, would you want to stay there?
Can you envision taking your vacation so far away from home?
All in all, the question of whether the moon is still unexplored really depends on how
we define the word, unexplored.
Thanks to lunar orbiter missions, the majority of it has at least been mapped.
Thanks to landers and rovers, we’ve also managed to learn more (and in greater detail)
about specific regions of it.
But the age of human lunar exploration is still yet to take shape.
It’s still yet to take off, despite us having first visited the moon more than fifty years
ago.
What do you think?
Is there anything we missed?
Let us know in the comments, check out these other clips from Unveiled, and make sure you
subscribe and ring the bell for our latest content.