I'm going to try to shine a historical light on our language,
and tell you a story about the electric vocabulary.
It all begins over 2,600 years ago.
An ancient Greek, called Thales of Miletus,
is thought to be the first person to observe
what we would today call electrical phenomena.
He discovered that a piece of amber, when rubbed with fur,
could pick up small pieces of straw.
In Thales's language, amber was called "electron."
For a long time, that was pretty much all anybody knew about the subject.
And nature had to wait around 2,200 years
before any new investigations were made into amber's properties.
William Gilbert, a 17th-century English scientist,
discovered that with a careful experimentation,
a number of other materials
could display the attractive properties of amber.
He also found that they could attract objects besides straw.
Gilbert named these amberlike objects
after the Greek for amber.
He called them "electrics."
About 40 years later, in nearby Norwich,
Sir Thomas Browne carried out similar experiments.
He didn't figure out anything different from William Gilbert,
yet the way he described the experiments
coined the word we use all the time.
The way he saw it, when you rub, say, a crystal with a cloth,
it becomes an electric object.
And just as we speak of elastic objects,
and say they possess the property of elasticity,
electric objects possess the property of electricity.
The 18th-century French physicist Charles Du Fay
was the next person to make an important new discovery.
He found that almost any object, except for metals and fluids,
could be turned electric
after subjecting them to a combination of heating and rubbing.
In addition, he found that when two electrics are place near each other,
they sometimes attract, and sometimes repel.
With this extra knowledge,
Du Fay found that there were two distinct groups of electrics.
Any two objects from the same group will always repel,
while a pair of one from each group will always attract.
Despite these new discoveries,
Du Fay's descriptions of the physics are all lost to history.
Instead, it is the vocabulary of a charismatic young American
that we still remember and use to this day.
Benjamin Franklin heard of the work going on in Europe,
and started his own playful experiments.
He quickly learned how to make electric devices
that would De-electrify by producing very large sparks.
Keen on mischievous pranks,
Franklin would often shock his friends with these machines.
As he built more effective devices,
he likened the act of electrifying and De-electrifying
to charging and discharging weaponry.
It didn't take long for Franklin and others to realize
that it was possible to link these weapons of mischief together.
Franklin, continuing with the metaphor,
likened this grouping to cannons on a ship.
The gun deck on a military vessel
fired their cannons simultaneously, in a battery.
Similarly, this electric battery,
would discharge all at the same time,
causing large sparks.
This new technology raised an interesting question:
Was a lightning cloud just a large electrical battery?
Franklin's description of all this was as follows:
he supposed that there is a substance
he called the electrical fluid, that is common to all things.
If, say, a person rubs a glass tube,
this rubbing, or charging, causes a flow of this fluid,
or an electrical current, to move from the person to the glass.
Both the person and the tube become electrics as a result.
Normally, if the person was standing on the ground,
their electrical fluid would return to normal,
with an exchange from the common stock of the Earth,
as Franklin called it.
Standing on something like a wax block can cut off this supply.
Franklin said that an object with an excess of this fluid
was positively charged,
and something lacking this fluid was negatively charged.
When objects touch, or are near each other,
the electrical fluid can flow between them
until they reach a balance.
The bigger the difference in the fluid between the two objects,
the larger the distance the fluid can jump,
causing sparks in the air.
And, it is the material of the object
that determines if it gains or loses electrical fluid
during charging.
These are Du Fay's two groups of electrics.
You might have heard the phrase:
"Opposite charges attract, like charges repel."
That's why.
For the next 150 years,
Franklin's theory was used to develop
many more ideas and discoveries,
all using the vocabulary he invented.
This scientific inquiry brought forth technological advances
and eventually, scientists were able to take a closer look
at the electric fluid itself.
In 1897, J.J. Thomson, working in Cambridge, England,
discovered that the electrical fluid is actually made up of small particles
named by the physicist George Stoney as "electrons."
And so we return to the ancient Greek word for amber,
where our story began.
However, there's an epilogue to this tale.
It was discovered that these electrons flow
in the opposite direction to what Franklin supposed.
Therefore, objects that are positively charged
don't have an excess of electrical fluid,
they actually lack electrons.
Yet, instead of relabeling everything the other way around,
people have decided to hold on to Franklin's vocabulary
as a matter of habit and convention.
While acknowledging the discovery of electrons,
they kept Franklin's flow of electrical fluid,
renaming it: conventional current.
The electron has become the salmon of electricity,
swimming upstream in a ghostly river of conventional current.
This can be, understandably, confusing for many people
who aren't familiar with the history of these ideas.
And so I hope,
with this short story about the electric vocabulary,
you will be able to see
through the accident and whimsy of this subject
and can gain a clearer understanding
of the physics of electrical phenomena.