>> HE DID RESPOND TO THIS CRITICISM.
SOME PEOPLE DID
RESPOND ON TWITTER BECAUSE IT TOOK HIM A DAY TO RESPOND.
ONE
PERSON SAID THIS.
DID YOU HAVE A REACTION WHEN YOU SAW THIS?
I
DON'T KNOW IF I WOULD HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL TO FILL MYSELF IN
THAT SPACE.
I HAVE NEVER BEEN TO AUSCHWITZ.
>> IT IS JUST PULLING HER PHONE AND FILMING SOMETHING.
THEY GIVE
YOU RULES, AND HE SEEMS TO UNDERSTAND THERE IS A GRAVITY TO
WHERE HE IS AT.
HE JUST THINKS THIS RULE DOESN'T APPLY TO HIM.
I SEE HIS INTENTION IS TO RAISE SOME KIND OF AWARENESS ABOUT
SOMETHING.
THAT IS WHY THEY KEEP AUSCHWITZ WHERE IT IS AS IT IS,
TO RAISE AWARENESS AND MAKE PEOPLE FEEL ABOUT THIS.
NOW THEY
ALSO SAY, HEY, IF YOU GIVE A DAMN ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED HERE,
WE WOULD LIKE YOU NOT TO TALK.
I THINK HE PROBABLY THOUGHT I NEED
TO MAKE A STATEMENT HERE.
AND HE LINKED THIS VERY REAL MURDER
GENOCIDE SUFFERING TO HIS JOB WITH HOMELAND SECURITY.
THAT IS
SOMETHING YOU CAN DO LATER.
YOU CAN COMMUNICATE THAT LATER.
BUT
RIGHT THERE ALL WE HAVE IS DOCUMENTATION OF YOU
POLITICIZING THIS WHICH IS SOMETHING THEY JUST DON'T WANT
YOU TO DO.
>> I AM NOT ONE MUCH ON CEREMONY.
HE IS ALLOWED TO HAVE
HIS POLITICAL OPINION ON AUSCHWITZ.
I'M GLAD HE CARES
ENOUGH TO HIGHLIGHT IT IN HIS APOLOGY.
BUT INSIDE THE GAS
CHAMBER TO DO A VIDEO?
A BIT MUCH.
SO HE HAS RETRACTED IT AND
REALIZES HE SHOULD NOT HAVE DONE IT.
IF YOU MADE IT AT A LATER
DATE, I WOULD NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.
I WOULD NOT EVEN HAVE A
PROBLEM WITH IT IF HE DID IT OUTSIDE AS LONG AS HE IS
RESPECTFUL OF THE RULES THERE.
WHAT HE TAKES AWAY FROM IT IS
NOT HUMAN RIGHTS, IT IS NOT CARING FOR MINORITIES.
THOSE
WOULD BE FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD.
HE GOES TO WE MUST PROTECT THE
HOMELAND.
I'M PRETTY SURE THAT IS KIND OF WHAT THE OTHER SIDE SAID IN
THAT SITUATION.