I’m often asked what my opinion
about a diet or disease is.
Who cares what my or anyone else’s opinion is.
All we should care about is what the science says.
What does the best available balance of evidence
Published in the peer- reviewed medical literature
have to say right now?
Welcome to the Nutrition Facts Podcast,
I’m your host, Dr. Michael Greger.
Did you know that research has consistently shown
that healthcare professionals are biased
against people classified as overweight or obese?
In our first story,
we look at how common this problem is.
Described as the last “acceptable” form of bias, weight stigma is
the rampant discrimination and stereotyping of overweight individuals.
Fifty overweight women were asked to keep a diary of all the times
they felt they were being stigmatized for their weight.
Over a single week, more than a thousand instances were recorded.
An overweight woman may expect to be harassed
such as called names or insulted,
run into physical barriers
(like unable to fit into public seats),
or discriminated against (such as perceived poorer service
at restaurants or stores) on average about three times a day.
Obese men report three times less discrimination than women
of the same size; so, maybe it’s only a daily occurrence for them.
They’re not just being paranoid.
Studies using professional actors presenting as job applicants
made up to appear overweight with the Hollywood magic
of theatrical prostheses were significantly more likely to be
discriminated against than when appearing as their normal weight selves.
This employment bias was found to be especially prejudiced
against overweight women compared to men.
Attitudes can also be explored in surveys.
In a comparison of 16 stigmatized social groups,
such as homosexuals and homeless people, only drug addicts and smokers
were regarded with higher levels of disgust than obese individuals.
The researchers did note, however, there was effectively a tie:
obese people were “rated just as disgusting as politicians.”
This weight stigma starts surprisingly young.
Children as young as three years old describe overweight peers as
“mean,” “stupid,” “lazy,” and “ugly.”
Then, there was that famous study published back in 1961.
Children in summer camps and schools across a swath
of different social, cultural, and ethnic backgrounds
in California, Montana, and New York were asked to rank
the following images as to who they liked best,
including a child with crutches with a brace on their leg,
a child in a wheelchair, a child with one of their hands missing,
a facially disfigured child, or an obese child.
In every population of kids they tested,
there was “remarkable uniformity.”
The obese child always came in dead last
That was ages ago, though.
But in 2003, researchers published the 40-year follow-up.
The study was repeated and...the title of the study gives it away:
"The Stigmatization of Obese Children"...getting worse.
The obese child was liked even less!
This parallels trends throughout society with nearly
a 70 percent jump in perceived weight discrimination
recorded in national surveys since the mid-nineties.
Attitudes among teachers may not be helping.
More than a quarter of teachers and other school staff surveyed
felt that becoming obese is “one of the worst things
that could happen to a person.”
Even parents can be biased, providing less support for college
for their overweight daughters compared to thinner siblings.
As two prominent obesity researchers commented,
“It is a strong prejudice indeed when parents discriminate
against their own children.”
What about doctors?
One representative national survey found that more than
half of physicians viewed obese patients as
“awkward, unattractive, ugly, and noncompliant.”
About a quarter of nurses agreed or strongly agreed to the statement:
“Caring for an obese patient usually repulses me.”
This antagonism can have serious health consequences
for those who may need it the most.
For example, obese women are at higher risk
for developing cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers;
yet, they are less likely to be screened.
Morbidly obese patients only have about half the odds
of getting their recommended pelvic exams.
Part of this may be avoidance on the part of the patient,
but some doctors just turn obese patients away.
The Sun Sentinel polled OB/GYN practices in Florida
and found that as many as one in seven refused to see heavier women,
for example, setting weight cut-offs for new patients
starting at 200 pounds.
Even doctors who welcome obese patients have been found
to give them short shrift.
Physicians randomized to receive a medical chart
of a migraine patient who was either presented
as average weight, overweight, or obese said that they would give
the obese patient about 28 percent less of their time.
And it’s less quality time.
Recorded doctor’s visits found physicians tend to build
less emotional rapport with overweight patients.
Even obesity specialists profess increasingly
explicit anti-fat attitudes.
Worsening in surveys taken between 2001 and 2013,
obesity specialists described fat people as significantly
more “lazy, stupid, and worthless.”
Even in the medical literature, you’ll find lines like this,
an example from the Annals of Internal Medicine:
“obesity is an aesthetic crime: it is ugly.”
The good news is they appear to be able to hide their disdain.
In a study entitled “Obese patients overestimate physicians’ attitudes
of respect,” despite the negative attitudes doctors harbored
towards their obese patients, the same patients expressed
their satisfaction with their providers.
The researchers concluded, “While physicians may be
successfully playing the part, the lack of true respect suggests...
the authenticity of the patient–physician relationship
should be questioned.”
In our final story today we ask,
how might weight stigma be a vicious cycle?
Although total fasting can dramatically increase blood levels
of the stress hormone cortisol, as much as
doubling within five days, just dieting alone does not.
There is, however, a way stress and obesity could
turn into a vicious cycle: weight stigma.
Across thousands of individuals followed for four years,
those reporting discriminatory experiences
had more than twice the odds of becoming obese.
And those who started out obese had more than three times the odds
of staying that way compared to those who started out
at the same weight but didn’t experience discrimination.
Now, this could be from stress-induced eating
on one side of the calorie balance equation
or stigma-induced exercise avoidance on the other.
Obese individuals with more frequent experiences with
weight stigma report greater avoidance of exercising in public,
feeling judged and embarrassed.
These “too fat to exercise” fears may be well-grounded.
Strong anti-fat biases have been documented in both
fitness professionals and regular gym-goers, which may translate
into an unwelcoming environment in fitness centers and health clubs.
Whichever side of the calorie equation gets tipped,
those who experience weight stigma can also end up suffering
health consequences independent of any added weight.
Those reporting more frequent fat prejudice exhibit higher levels
of depression, higher levels of inflammation, and higher levels
of oxidative stress, as well as a shorter lifespan.
Two studies following a total of nearly 20,000 people
both found about a 50 percent increase in mortality risk
among those reporting greater daily discrimination.
Weight discrimination may shorten life expectancy.
Despite these hazards, some scholars advocate
for even more fat-shaming.
The President Emeritus of the prestigious Hastings Center
infamously advocated for “a kind of stigmatization lite,”
using social pressures to compel people to lose weight
without resorting to outright discrimination.
After all, he argued, what else has the potential to counter
the persuasive force of the billions spent in advertising
every year by the food and beverage industry.
It worked against tobacco.
He recalls his own battle with addiction:
“The force of being shamed and beat upon socially was as
persuasive for me to stop smoking as the threats to my health.”
The public health campaign to stigmatize cigarettes turned
“what had been considered simply a bad habit
into reprehensible behavior.”
When such campaigns have been tried, they have been met
with fierce resistance though.
Georgia’s Strong4Life campaign featured billboards of
morose-looking obese children with captions like
“Warning: Chubby kids may not outlive their parents” or
“It’s hard to be a little girl when you’re not.”
The campaign sponsors defended the ads as an attempt
to break through the denial in a state with some of the
highest recorded childhood obesity rates.
It’s only defensible, though, if it works.
Yale researchers found that when normal-weight women
provided with bowls of M&M’s, jelly beans, and chips
to snack on after watching clips of stigmatizing material
like clumsy, loud, lazy stereotypes getting teased
about their weight, they eat about the same amount
compared to watching neutral material such as insurance commercials.
But when overweight women watch the same two sets of videos,
they triple their calorie intakes
after watching the stigmatizing scenes.
The researchers concluded, “This directly challenges the notion
that pressure to lose weight in the form of weight stigma will have
a positive, motivating effect on overweight individuals.”
In other words, it could make things worse.
Being labeled “too fat” in childhood was associated with a
higher risk of becoming obese compared to children
weighing the same who were never told that.
But does that mean we should just ignore the elephant in the room?
Many doctors apparently think so.
Just as veterinarians have been found to be reluctant
to tell people their pets are obese,
fewer than a quarter of parents of overweight children report
having been told by pediatricians about their child’s weight status.
One might think it would be obvious,
but a Gallup Survey found that parents appear to be
“notoriously poor judges of their children’s weight.”
Similarly, the percentage of adults who describe themselves
as overweight has remained essentially unchanged
over the past few decades, despite skyrocketing obesity.
All this, Gallup concluded, helps “paint a picture of
mass delusion in the United States about its rising weight.”
I think patients have the right to be informed.
Those told by their doctor that they are overweight
have about four times the odds of attempting weight loss
and about twice the odds of succeeding.
Just as smoking physicians are less likely to challenge
their smoking patients, overweight physicians are less likely
to bring up the subject of weight loss
or even document obesity in their charts.
Ironically, overweight patients trust diet advice
from overweight doctors more than docs who are normal weight.
Unfortunately, primary care physicians appear
to have little to offer in terms of specifics.
Fewer than half who were surveyed said they provide
specific advice to their patients.
Just telling patients to “watch what they eat”
is unlikely to be particularly helpful,
but many primary care physicians may not even get that far.
Most physicians said they would spend more time working
with patients on weight management if only their time
was “reimbursed appropriately.”
Maybe we could offer a bonus to refrain from blaming the victim.
One pair of commentators wrote in response to the pro-stigma camp,
“If shaming reduced obesity, there would be no fat people.”
I want to end this weight stigma video series with the
jaw-dropping findings of a study that I think best illustrates
how hard it is to live inside a fat body.
If this doesn’t foster sympathy among my medical colleagues,
I don’t know what will.
Researchers talked to men and women who had lost and kept off
more than 100 pounds to tap into their unique insight,
having personally experienced what it was like to be
morbidly obese and then, on average, 126 pounds lighter.
Forty-seven such individuals were interviewed.
They were asked to think back to when they were heavier
and make a choice: “If someone offered you a couple of
million dollars if you stayed morbidly obese forever,
would you have chosen the money?
Or would you have chosen to be normal weight no matter what?”
Option #1 was, “I would have chosen no money and being normal weight.
It would have taken me about a second to decide.”
Option #2 was, “I probably would have chosen being normal weight.
But the possibility of having that much money
would make me think about the choice.”
Option #3 was, “I wanted to be normal weight,
but I really could use the money.
If I would be a multimillionaire,
I think I could live with being morbidly obese.”
One of the 47 had to think about it,
but the other 46 jumped at Option 1.
No one chose Option 3.
They all said they would give up being a multimillionaire
to be normal weight.
If that shocked you, buckle your seatbelts.
They were then asked about being obese compared to other disabilities.
Normally, when you ask people to choose between living with
their own disability or switching to a different one,
there is a strong proclivity to stay with their own.
For example, even though most people
would rather be deaf than blind,
blind people prefer to remain blind by a large margin,
rather than having sight without sound.
They already know how to cope with their own disability,
and so there’s safety in familiarity.
However, the exact opposite happened
when the formerly obese were asked.
Every single one of the 47 said they’d rather be deaf
for the rest of their lives than obese.
Every single one said they’d rather have difficulty reading,
be diabetic, have very bad acne, or heart disease than be obese.
More than 90 percent said they’d rather have a leg amputated,
and similarly, about 9 out of 10 said
they’d rather be blind their whole lives than obese.
Obesity appears to be the only handicap where nearly everyone
wants to switch, no matter what the cost.
To quote one study subject,
”When you’re blind, people want to help you.
No one wants to help when you’re fat.”
We would love it if you could share with us your stories
about reinventing your health through evidence-based nutrition.
Go to nutritionfacts.org/testimonials.
We may share it on our social media to help inspire others.
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, or studies mentioned here,
please go to the Nutrition Facts Podcast landing page.
There you’ll find all the detailed information you need –
plus, links to all of the sources we cite to each of these topics.
For a timely text on the pathogens that cause pandemics,
order the e-book, audiobook, or hard copy
of my last book, “How to Survive a Pandemic”.
For recipes, check out my second-to-last book,
my “How Not to Diet Cookbook”.
It’s beautifully designed with more than 100 recipes
for delicious and nutritious meals.
And all the proceeds I receive from the sales
of all my books goes to charity.
NutritionFacts.org is a nonprofit, science-based public service,
where you can sign up for free daily updates
on the latest in nutrition research via bite-sized videos and articles.
Everything on the website is free.
There’s no ads, no corporate sponsorship.
It’s strictly non-commercial. I’m not selling anything.
I just put it up as a public service, as a labor of love,
as a tribute to my grandmother,
whose own life was saved with evidence-based nutrition.