A MEGA BUDGET, HOW WHAT WILL
NASA SEE THE PENTAGON HASN’T?
JOINING ME TO DISCUSS SCIENTIFIC
COALITION FOR UAP STUDY BOARD
MEMBER AND UAP RESEARCH LEGEND,
ALEJANDRO ROJAS, WELCOME BACK.
>> THANK YOU, GOOD TO BE BACK.
KENNEDY: MY FIRST QUESTION, NASA
HASN’T BEEN STUDYING UAP’S, HOW
IS THAT?
I JUST ASSUMED NASA WOULD BE
LOOKING INTO SPACE FOR FLYING
THINGS.
>> THAT’S GREAT POINTS, WHY
HAVEN’T THEY BEEN?
IT’S BEEN A THING FOR DECADES.
PRESIDENT CARTER HAD A UFO
SIGHTING AND HE SAID IF HE GETS
PRESIDENT, HE WILL ASK NASA TO
DO IT, HE DID IN 1977 AND THEY
ESSENTIALLY SAID THANK YOU BUT
NO THANK YOU.
THEY KIND OF THINK OF IT AS A
LOSING SITUATION SO UFO
BELIEVERS, THEY WILL NEVER BE
HAPPY UNTIL YOU SHOW THEM AN
ALIEN BODY OR SCIENTIFIC
COMMUNITY, THEY WON’T BE HAPPY
YOU’RE TOUCHING THIS TOPIC AT
ALL BECAUSE IT’S NOT SEEN AS
CREDIBLE.
KENNEDY: THAT’S WHAT NASA HAS
SAID, WE ARE GETTING A LOT OF
SKEPTICISM AND PUSHBACK, WE ARE
NOT SUPPOSED TO LOOK INTO THESE
THINGS, THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO.
SCIENTIFICALLY AND SKEPTICALLY
THAT’S HOW WE WANT GOVERNMENT
BODIES TO APPROACH THESE THINGS
SO HOW WILL NASA’S APPROACH BE
DIFFERENT THAN THE PENTAGON?
IS THE PENTAGON JUST ABOUT
NATIONAL SECURITY?
>> THAT’S EXACTLY CORRECT.
PENTAGON NATIONAL SECURITY AND
THEY ARE LOOKING FOR THREATS FOR
OUR MILITARY OR THE NATION AS A
WHOLE, THE ISSUE IS THAT MUCH
MORE SECRETIVE SO THE IDEA OF US
POSSIBLY GETTING INFORMATION OR
SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATIONS TO GET
THAT SO WE CAN ACTUALLY WORK ON
IT, IS PRETTY LOW.
THAT’S WHAT’S EXCITING ABOUT
NASA GETTING INTO THIS, WHAT
THEY WILL SPEND THE $100,000 ON
HIS TO SEE WHO KNOWS WHAT AND
WHO GOT WHAT AND WHAT’S GOING ON
AND THEN THEY WANT TO DO IT
SCIENTIFIC STUDY WHICH IS WHAT
WE WANT TO SEE AS WELL SO THAT’S
MORE EXCITING BECAUSE IF THINGS
WORK CORRECTLY AND THEY MAKE
DISCOVERIES, THE PUBLIC WILL
FIND OUT, HOPEFULLY SOONER
RATHER THAN LATER.
KENNEDY: WHAT YOU THINK NASA
COULD DISCOVER?
>> WHO KNOWS?
ONE OF THE BIG QUESTIONS IS, ARE THEY CATCHING THESE THINGS ON
THEY CATCHING THESE THINGS ON
SATELLITE LEAMING ATMOSPHERE?
IT’S A BIG DEAL BECAUSE WHEN IT
COMES TO REPULSION, YOU TAKE A
LOT OF THINGS OFF THE TABLE WHEN
YOU SEE SOMETHING CRUISING
AROUND IN SPACE.
KENNEDY: AND WHEN IT COMES TO
THIS, WE ARE LIMITED WITH WHAT
WE CAN SEE FROM EARTH AND THERE
ARE A LOT OF WAYS TO EXPLAIN
AWAY INCLUDING ILLUSIONS AND
TECHNOLOGY WE ARE NOT PRIVY TO
THAT ONE OF OUR ADVERSARIES
MIGHT HAVE BUT THAT IS AN
INTERESTING THOUGHT BECAUSE
CONSIDERING THE APPARAT I WE
HAVE, ESPECIALLY NOT JUST WITH
VISUAL TELESCOPE TO SEE WHAT IS
ENTERING AND LEAVING OUR
ATMOSPHERE BUT IT MAKES ME
WONDER, HOW COME NASA HASN’T
BEEN INTERESTED IN THIS BEFORE?
THEY GOT ACCESS TO SO MUCH INCREDIBLE QUICKLY EVOLVING
INCREDIBLE QUICKLY EVOLVING
TECHNOLOGY BUT THIS DOES NOT
OCCUR TO THEM?
IS THIS SUCH A PARIAH IN THE
SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY?
>> IT IS AND THAT’S WHAT’S
SHOCKING, IT’S SUCH A BIG TABOO
NASA HAS BEEN TOO AFRAID TO LOOK
AT IT AND THE MILITARY HAS PUT
THEIR HEAD IN THE SAND IN
IMPORTANT SITUATIONS SO THEY
SHOWED A VIDEO AT THE HEARING WITH A BUNCH OF OBJECTS OVER A
WITH A BUNCH OF OBJECTS OVER A
NAVY SHIP AND SAID IT JUST TURNS
OUT TO BE DRONES.
WHAT DRONE?
WE GOT A REPORT THAT CAME OUT
RECENTLY THE DRONE SITUATION
COULD HAVE BEEN A DRONE TESTING
OR AN ATTACK FROM HONG KONG SO
DRONES ARE AN AREA WHERE THEY
ARE LABELED AS UAP AND WE IGNORE
THEM AND IT SHOWS HOW DANGEROUS
IT IS TO IGNORE THINGS WE CAN’T
FIGURE OUT.
KENNEDY: WE SHOULD BE LOOKING
FOR THE EXPLANATION EVEN IF IT’S
MOMENTARILY BEYOND OUR GRASP OR
IF IT IS TRULY INCONVENIENT.
THE GOOD NEWS ABOUT THIS NASA
STUDY IS IT WILL BE OPEN, THEY
ARE NOT GOING TO USE CLASSIFIED
MILITARY INFORMATION, THEY ARE
GOING TO USE WHAT IS KNOWABLE
AND INVITE OTHER RESEARCHERS TO LOOK AT IT, TO ADD WHEN
LOOK AT IT, TO ADD WHEN
NECESSARY AND COME UP WITH MUCH
MORE COMPREHENSIVE ANSWER THAN
WE HAVE HAD SO FAR SO I’M ALL FOR IT.
FOR IT.
ARE YOU EXCITED?
>> I’M VERY EXCITED, SCIENTIFIC
VALUE OF LOOKING INTO THIS IS
IMPORTANT, WE WILL MAKE NEW
DISCOVERIES ONE WAY OR ANOTHER
WHETHER THEY ARE ALIENS OR NOT.
KENNEDY: AND THAT TECHNOLOGY, IF
THAT CAN GET YOU FROM L.A. TO