- [Voiceover] You might be wondering whether
there are any factors that might make someone more or less
likely to conform or the likelihood that they will
adjust their behaviors or thinking
to go along with the group.
And there certainly are.
And while I won't go over all of them in this video,
I do want to give you a pretty wide or diverse variety
so you can see just how much of this behavior
can be dependent upon external factors
that otherwise might have nothing to do
with the person themselves.
And the first factor I want to talk about is group size.
Specifically, people seem to be more likely
to conform when they're in groups of three to five.
We are also more likely to conform
when the opinion of the group is unanimous
or when everyone in the group agrees upon a certain opinion.
As an example of this, in one variant of the Asch line study
the researchers changed the experiment
such that the participant had a supporter,
someone who gave the correct answer
before it was the participant's turn to answer.
And what they found was that even one defector
can influence how likely an individual is to comply.
So while in the original Asch study,
37% of participants fully complied
or complied on every trial,
total compliance dropped to only 5%
when there was a supporter in the group.
When they asked the participants whether or not
the presence of that defector in any way
influenced their responses, they claimed that they didn't.
So while the research does show that the presence
of a defector influences how likely we are to conform,
it appears that we're not aware
of the effect that they can have.
If we admire a group status or some other characteristic,
we are also more likely to go along with them.
And while this can be used to explain
why children might be more likely to go along
with a popular group, because they admire them
or want to be like them, it also explains why
we're more likely to trust the opinion of four doctors
than four gardeners when it comes to our health decisions.
Group cohesion can also have a strong influence
on our likelihood to conform.
If we have no connection or feel no connection with the
group, we feel less of a need to go along with that group.
Another factor is whether or not we believe
that our behavior is being observed.
In a different variant of the Asch line study,
the participant was told that because he came in late,
he would record his answers on a sheet of paper
instead of saying them out loud.
And because of this, they're responses were
not shared with the group,
and when these participants were confident
that their answers wouldn't be judged
by the others in the room, they were
much less likely to conform.
Relatedly, how people believe that the public will respond,
also can have a large effect.
If we think that we'll be met with the public's acceptance,
we're happy not to conform,
but when we think that we'll be met with shunning,
we are much more likely to go along with the group.
There are also a number of internal factors
that can influence how likely we are to conform.
One of those is prior commitments.
If we state something upfront,
then we're less likely to go against it later on.
So a prior commitment to the group's message
or direction, can serve to increase conformity,
but at the same time, a prior commitment
against it will decrease conformity.
We're also more likely to conform when
we feel or are made to feel insecure.
It makes us feel less comfortable
about our own knowledge, which
increases the likelihood that we're
going to follow the judgments of others.
There are also a number of factors
that can influence obedience.
And to review, while conformity can involve
us changing how we think, obedience is
the act of following directions or instructions
or orders without question and without protesting them.
And it's usually done in order to avoid
negative consequences associated with disobeying.
And because of this, a lot of the factors
that dictate whether or not we will obey
depend on the type of authority that is giving those orders.
How close we are to the authority
can have a strong influence.
We are more likely to accept orders
from someone we know and respect than someone who we don't.
Interestingly enough, actual physical closeness
or physical proximity can also influence it.
Participants in the Milgram study
were much more likely to obey the commands
of the experimenter when they were standing
right behind them, as compared to
when they were standing in the back of a room
or standing in a different room.
The legitimacy of the authority also matters.
People were more likely to obey commands
in the Milgram study when the experimenter
was wearing a lab coat and carrying a clipboard,
as compared to when they did not.
Institutional authority also matters.
Milgram's study took place at a well-respected university.
And you really don't expect such places
to give you harmful commands.
And while this institutional authority
can be physical, it can also be symbolic.
So the institution of the police or the government
also tends to bring about a certain authority.
Victim distance can also have an effect.
In the original Milgram study,
participants were in a different room
than the learner or the victim.
So they couldn't see him.
When the study was repeated such that
the participant had to physically pick up
the learner's hand and place it on the board
that would electrocute them,
it tended to reduce the likelihood that
the participant would obey the commands of the experimenter.
But note that this didn't stop everyone.
30% of the participants still gave all of the shocks.
This relates to the idea of depersonalization,
when the learner or victim is made to seem less human,
possibly through stereotypes or prejudices,
people are less likely to object to acting against them.
And similar to conformity, obedience is also
more likely to happen when there are
no models of defiance.
We're more likely to disobey orders
when we see others doing the same.
And one thing that you might be wondering
after hearing all of this is whether or not
there is a certain type of person who is
more likely to conform or more likely to obey.
And the answer seems to be no.
There is no one personality that leads people
to be more susceptible to groups or to authority.
That said, we do know that people's moods
can have a strong effect.
People who are having a rough day are less likely
to conform than those who are having a good day.
We also know that status and culture can play a role.
People of a lower social or economic status,
so those who don't have a lot of power
socially or economically and politically,
or those who lack power in general,
are more likely to conform.
We also know that people in individualistic
cultures like the U.S. or western Europe
that emphasize personal achievement over group achievement,
are less likely to conform than people
in collectivist cultures, or cultures that
emphasize the family or the group over the individual
like China or Korea.
But even so, you need to keep in mind,
that people in individualistic cultures still conform
all the time by doing things like going to school
and eating cereal for breakfast.
And taken together, all of this helps to describe
why perfectly ordinary people can sometimes
do very terrible things,
but by being aware of these factors,
we can also help to reduce them.
I remember being really strongly affected
by the idea that the presence of just one nonconformer
in a group could cause others to not conform as well.
It made me consider the fact that by not conforming
or not obeying myself, I could have
a strong influence on others.
And I find a lot of comfort and strength in that idea.
I can also take the time to think about why
I'm conforming to a group or why I'm obeying an instruction.
Knowing the ways in which people can be influenced
can give us more insight and possibly
more control over these situations.