NASA is still on a big Moon 2024 push and they want to get astronauts on the
surface of the Moon. They've awarded some new contracts so let's talk about what that
means, coming up...
Hey guys Tory here from Overlook Horizon if you're new to the channel we fly high
altitude weather balloon flights to the edge of space and back and along the way
we talk about space, science and technology so if that's something you're
interested in consider subscribing. On April 30th 2020 NASA announced three big
contracts for their upcoming Moon 2024 lunar missions. It should be no
secret that NASA has a target date of 2024 for when they want to land
astronauts on the surface of the Moon again and not only is 2024 still on the
table for NASA but it is the only option that they're pushing for. That is for now.
The intent is to land astronauts again on the surface of the Moon in 2024 and
set up sustainable habitats there by 2028. The three most recent contracts are
pretty noteworthy, because this is the lunar lander portion for the vehicle
that will take astronauts down to the surface of the Moon. Now, these contracts
provide initial development funding. They haven't actually selected a vehicle that
will take astronauts to the surface yet but this is still pretty good news for
these three award winners. Now, this set of contracts will provide development
work over the next 10 months and awards just under 1 billion dollars worth of
funding for that development. Those three contracts are going to go to Blue Origin,
Dynetics and SpaceX. All three of these companies will be launching their lunar
lander separately from crew and the crew will meet up with the lunar lander in
lunar orbit. Now, Blue Origin is going to get the lion's share of the contracts with
579 million dollars going to them alongside their partner companies as
part of the National Team. The National Team is a partnership of companies set
up by Blue Origin which also includes Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman
and Draper. Now, as part of that contract Blue Origin will be the prime contractor.
They'll be responsible for program management, safety, engineering all that
kind of stuff and the other companies will follow their lead. Blue Origin will
also be developing the descent element for the lunar lander. As part of their
proposal Lockheed Martin will develop a reusable ascent element
and lead crewed flight operations. Northrop Grumman will develop the
transfer element and Draper will lead descent guidance and provide flight
avionics. Dynetics is the second company to be awarded a contract and they are
getting $253 million dollars. They're developing their
lunar lander alongside a partnership with the Sierra Nevada Company. They also
have a bit of a unique approach to this because they're ALPACA lander has a pair
of drop tanks that are launched separately which allows the main Lander
to be reused. These tanks are depleted and then jettisoned during descent. That
ALPACA Lander is expected to launch on the United Launch Alliance Vulcan rocket
which is their up and coming new rocket that they're developing. And lastly what
came as a surprise to many people in the aerospace industry is SpaceX. SpaceX was
awarded 135 million dollars to further develop their
Starship platform. This is specifically intended to be a lunar optimized
Starship which means that it won't have any flaps on board and it's not going to
have any heat shielding for Earth reentry but it will be reusable from
lunar orbit to the moon surface and back again and of course there are many
people that are skeptical about the Starship just because of the sheer scale
of it and the fact that everything is public and we can see things like the
prototypes explode in a very public fashion but even NASA Administrator Jim
Bridenstine has given kudos to SpaceX for their ability to fail and fix.
He said that SpaceX is very good at iterative testing and fixing as they're
developing their vehicles and really it's just impossible to ignore the fact
that if Starship is successful it will provide a very low-cost option to NASA
and really that low-cost would be huge for NASA because that would help avoid
the problems of the Apollo program which was cancelled because of the high cost.
Now, there is a big difference in the dollar amounts that have been awarded to
each company but NASA is cautioning people not to read too far into that.
It's not showing preferences or favorites in any way. Rather, those dollar
amounts actually are reflective of what the company both requested and the scope
of work that they're intending to complete over the next ten months. Now
just like with the Commercial Crew Program, NASA is intending to try to keep
multiple contractors onboard for developing these lunar landers but
ultimately three contractors might be a little bit too much for their budget so
they may have to pare down that list. So over the course of the next 10 months
NASA will be watching and participating in the development of these vehicles but
as this contract winds up they may be forced to eliminate one of these
providers. One thing that's still a little bit up in the air is NASA's Lunar
Gateway. Originally NASA had intended for the Lunar Gateway to be ready by the
time Artemis 3 took astronauts to lunar orbit but NASA has decided that they will
not go through the Gateway for Artemis 3 and instead they will meet up with one
of these landers in lunar orbit without the Gateway. At this point though NASA is
still pushing hard for that Lunar Gateway. They do still feel that the
Lunar Gateway is a key for a sustainable presence at the moon. The Lunar Gateway
enables NASA to reach a whole host of orbits around the moon so if they want
to go to the North Pole they can go there. If they want to go to the South
Pole they can go there. If they want to land somewhere around the equator they
can go there. The Gateway can open up a lot of opportunities. Unfortunately
though with NASA's big push for landing astronauts by 2024 some things just have
to get deferred to farther down the road. One notable absence in all these
contract announcements was that Boeing was left out of the mix. Now, Boeing did
submit a proposal for a lunar lander but NASA ultimately decided not to provide
them funding for development and it makes you wonder if this has anything to
do with the recent failures from the Boeing Starliner. So whose design do you
like better and which do you think will be ready by 2024? Any of them? All of
them? Let me know what you guys think in the comments down below. Thanks again for
watching. We'll see you the next video.
[blooper] ... by Blue Origin which also.. wish husha. wshhashaa
[blooper] ... SpaceX is very good at it
iterative it to reiterate Lee it to rated Lee iterative Lee it to rated Lee
[blooper] ... at the moon. at the moon.
[blooper] bluuuubplfgs. whoa. what was that?
[blooper] come on get it together