YOU
YOU CAN
YOU CAN SEE THE TURNAROUND IN JUST FOUR YEARS.
PRESIDENT TRUMP'S LEGAL TEAM
+@
+@ FILED
+@ FILED ITS FOURTH LAWSUIT IN THE
PAST 24 HOURS ALLEGING
IRREGULARITIES AND FRAUD IN
SOME STATES.
SOME STATES. IN MICHIGAN THE PRESIDENT'S
TEAM WAS TRYING TO STOP VOTE
COUNTING UNTIL THE REPS COULD
GET MEANINGFUL ACCESS TO
OBSERVE THE PROCESS. A JUDGE +@
DENIED THEM.
DENIED THEM. THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IN ABOUT A
PLANS TO FILE A LAWSUIT
CLAIMING AS MANY AS 10,000
PEOPLE CAST A BALLOT DESPITE NO
LONGER LIVING THERE.
THE COURT DISMISSED ANOTHER
LAWSUIT IN GEORGIA WITH THE
TRUMP CAMPAIGN ACCUSED A BOARD
+@
TRUMP CAMPAIGN ACCUSED A BOARD OF ELECTION OF IMPROPERLY
INTERMINGLING BALLOTS WITH
INELIGIBLE ONCE.
INELIGIBLE ONCE. A COURT IN PENNSYLVANIA DID
SIDE WITH THE PRESENT CAMPAIGN
ALLOWING THEM TO CLOSELY
OBSERVE THE BALLOT COUNT.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THE LEGAL
CHALLENGES.
CHALLENGES. JOINING ME NOW IS ERIC, A
CLINICAL PROFE+@SSOR OF LAW,
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.
THAT WAS A LOT TO UNPACK.
FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE, WHAT
IS THE PRESIDENT'S STRATE+@GY?
>> IT LOOKS LIKE A SHOTGUN
STRATEGY, FILE A WHOLE LOT OF
LAWSUITS TO SEE WHAT STICKS. A
LOT OF THEM DON'T MAKE SENSE,
THE DISCONTINUATION OF VOTING
OR THE COUNT, THAT WILL NOT
HAP+@PEN.
HAP+@PEN.
HAP+@PEN. UNIFIED A JUDGE THAT WILL +@STO
THE COUNTING IN ANY WAY.
WHAT THEY CALLED A VICTORY, THE
REPUBLICAN +@PARTY WITH RESPECT
TO THE OBSERVATION OF THE BALLOT
, I GUESS IS A VICTORY, THEY
CAN OBSERVE A LITTLE BIT MORE
CLOSELY, IT'S PRETTY SCATTERED.
I DON'T THINK WE WILL GET A
BETTER UNDERSTANDING +@ON THE
POTENTIAL LEGAL STRATEGY AFTER
THE VOTES COM+@E IN UNTIL WE
FIGURE OUT WHAT STATES WINCE
WENT WHICH WAY.
IF WE'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT ONE
STATE, PENNSYLVANIA, THAT IS
THE ONLY ONE AT ISSUE, THERE
MIGHT ACTUALLY BE A LAWSUIT FOR
THE SUPREME COURT THAT MIGHT
ACTUALLY BE A DECISION-MAKER AS
FAR AS WHAT IS GOING ON.
WITH JOE BIDEN+@ WINS THREE OR
FO+@UR OF THESE FINAL STATES TH
THE STRATEGY WILL BE TOTALLY
+@
THE STRATEGY WILL BE TOTALLY CHANGED.
CHANGED.
CHANGED. IT WILL BE M+@UCH MORE DIFFICUL
FOR THE PRESIDENT TO OVERCOME
THAT.
THAT.
THAT. INTO THE BALLOTS COME IN AND
THEY ARE ANNOUNCED I DON'T
THINK WE+@ WILL HAVE A CLEAR
SENSE OF WHERE THEY ARE GOING
WITH REAL EFFORT TO MAKE VIABLE
CLAIMS IN THE COURTS.
>> IT IS DIFFICULT TO FIGHT A
BATTLE ON MULTIPLE FRONTS.
TALKING ABOUT PENNSYLVANIA,
THEY ARE RULING THAT THEY
ALLOWED +@THE RIGHT IN BALLOTS
COME IN AFTER ELECTION DAY SO
AS LONG AS THEY WERE POSTMARKED
BY ELECTION DAY, THEY WOULD
STILL COUNT THEM THEY ACTUALLY
ARRIVED IN THE MAIL AFTER
ELECTION DAY, THAT IS SOMETHING
THAT COULD GO BEFORE THE
SUPREME COURT. TALK TO ME ABO+@
WHEN THE VOTERS CAST THOSE
BALLOTS.
BALLOTS.
BALLOTS. WHEN THEY FILL THEM OUT AND +@
DROP THEM IN THE MAIL, WERE
THEY NOT DOING SO UNDER THE LAW
AT THAT TIME?
>> THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT.
THAT'S HOW WE USUALLY LOOK AT
IT.
IT.
IT. MOST
IT. MOST COURTS WILL NOT DISTURB
THE BALLOTS THEY ARE RELYING ON
WH+@AT THE GOVERNMENT IS TELLIN
THEM, THEY WILL BE VERY HARD-
PRESSED TO OVERCOME +@THAT
THRESHOLD WHICH IS DENYING
PEOPLE ACCESS TO THE BALLOTS.
IF THE SITUATION WERE TO TAKE
AWAY THOSE VOTES FROM THOSE
PEOPLE BUT AGAIN THAT IS BEFORE
THE SUPREME COURT, THEY
INITIALLY SAID THEY WON'T HERE
BUT NOW IT MIGHT +@CHANGE A
LITTLE BIT, I THINK A LOT OF IT
WILL HAVE TO DO WITH HOW MANY
ACTUAL BALLOTS ARE BEING
RECEIVED.
RECEIVED.
RECEIVED. IT COULD BE THREE OR 4000 THAT
COME IN AFTER ELECTION DAY, THE
SITUATION MIGH+@T NOT BE ENOUGH
IF HE IS WINNING BY 100,000
VOTES AND WE DON'T KNOW IF THAT
IF HE IS WINNING BY 100,000 VOTES AND WE DON'T KNOW IF THAT@
IS THE NUMBER BUT IF IT DOESN'T
MATTER IT WILL NOT AFFECT TH+@A
PART.
PART.
PART. IT'S A SITUATION WHERE I THINK
WE WILL GET MORE CLARITY AS THE
ACTUAL NUMBERS COME IN AND WE
WILL SEE WHICH STATES ARE WON
AND LOST.
AND LOST.
AND LOST. >> GREAT POINT.
WE WANT TO REITERATE, THEY ARE